Another
Suspicious Aircrash! (MS804) (Updated)
(I have had major problems posting this item, probably because of the copied graphics, so will now post the up-dated version as text only. As always with these high-profile 'terrorist events', there appears to be several inexplicable elements, in particular relating to the actions of the pilots and timing. Perhaps someone will be able to explain them?)
At
2.30 am local time (00.30 GMT) on Thursday 19th May, 2016, contact
was lost with an EgyptAir (flight MS804) Airbus A320 south of Greek
island of Karpathos 16km/10 miles inside Egyptian airspace. It
was en route from Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport to Cairo.
The plane departed from Paris at 11:09 p.m. local time. It was expected to arrive in Cairo at 3:15 a.m. local time. The plane disappeared at about 2:30 a.m. local time. The airline initially said the plane went missing at 2:45 a.m. local time and it was supposed to arrive at 3:05 a.m.
TIMELINE
CONFUSION?
From
the Guardian
here, (http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2016/may/19/egyptair-plane-cairo-paris-live-updates?page=with:block-573d9b4ae4b04a0378340f77) reporting
Greek sources, the timeline is given as follows. You will see that it
is difficult to reconcile with other reports as the disappearance
time is given as 03.39 not 02.29 as previously stated!
THIS
CONFUSION OVER TIMING REALLY NEEDS TO BE CLEARED UP!
02:24: EgyptAir
flight 804 from Paris to Cairo enters Greek airspace, air traffic
controller permissions it for the remainder of its course.
02:48: The
flight is transferred to the next air traffic control sector and is
cleared for exit from Greek airspace. “The pilot was in good
spirits and thanked the controller in Greek.”
03:27: Athens
air traffic control tries to contact the aircraft to convey
information on the switch of communications and control from Athens
to Cairo air traffic. In spite of repeated calls, the aircraft does
not respond, whereupon the air traffic controller calls the distress
frequency, without a response from the aircraft.
03:29: It
is above the exit point (from Greek airspace).
03:39:40: The
aircraft signal is lost, approximately 7 nautical miles
south/southeast of the KUMBI point, within Cairo FIR.
Immediately
the assistance of radars of the Hellenic Air Force is requested to
detect the target, without result.
03:45: The
processes of search and rescue are initiated, simultaneously
informing the Flight Information Region of Cairo.
11.09
pm local time (2109 GMT) plane
leaves Paris heading to Cairo, Egypt
TIME? Last
contact between pilot and Greek Air Traffic Control when "the
pilot had not mentioned a problem" in his final contact, the
Greek authorities reported. The time for this given above was 02.48
(ie after the plane by other accounts was already lost!) “The
pilot was in good spirits and thanked the controller in Greek.”
TIME? When
moving from Greek to Egyptian controlled airspace, the captain failed
to respond to
routine contact by Greek Air Traffic Controllers. For an experienced
pilot this is extremely unusual and may either point to the Captain
and Co-Pilot's inability to do so for some reason, or a mechanical
breakdown in wireless communication for some reason. Remote blocking
cannot be ruled out.
2.26
- 2.29 am (local time) (0026 - 0029 GMT) ACARS records fire
and other alarms going off inside cabin.
2.29
am local time (0029 GMT) Flight
MS804 disappears from the radar, the Greek civil aviation authority
says. "48-64km from Egypt's northern coast" EgyptAir's
Vice President Ahmed Adel said. It would be helpful if we knew who's
radar it was on, Greek or Egyptian or both? The plane fell 6,705
metres (22,000 feet) and swerved sharply in Egyptian airspace
before it disappeared from radar screens, Greece's defence minister
Panos Kammenos says.
2.50
am (0050) Reports
there were failed attempts to contact the plane Sherif Fathy
says and adds "the last contact was at 2.30" by which we
assume he means radar not speech contact?
2.45
am (0045 GMT) Reported time of plane crashing into sea. (Is
this reliable?)
03:27: Athens
air traffic control tries to contact the aircraft to convey
information on the switch of communications and control from Athens
to Cairo air traffic. In spite of repeated calls, the aircraft does
not respond, whereupon the air traffic controller calls the distress
frequency, without a response from the aircraft.
So
how are we to make ANY SENSE of this report in the Guardian that
places the timing later. If as indicated it is GMT it would be
three hours later. If referring to 'am' it appears to be an HOUR
later. Or is this reference to Egypt local time? Wouldn't it be a
good idea for clarity if everyone stuck to the GMT equivalent so we
knew where we were time-wise?
"Greek
defence sources are describing time frame between 03:27 to 03:29 as
“critical point”, writes Helena Smith.
It was in this two
minute period when the plane made a 90 degree swerve left and dropped
from 37,000 feet to 15,000 feet before swerving 360 degrees right and
vanishing at 10,000 feet ten to 15 miles inside Egyptian air
space.
The Greek defence minister Panos Kammenos told
reporters in Athens that the country had also scrambled F16 fighter
jets to participate in the operation to locate the aircraft off the
south eastern Aegean island of Karpathos.
Greek officials are
hoping satellite footage may help locate the wreckage."
Source: http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2016/may/19/egyptair-plane-cairo-paris-live-updates?page=with:block-573d9b4ae4b04a0378340f77
All
66 people on board - consisting of five crew and three security
personnel plus 56 passengers - are feared dead. The nationalities of
the passengers were as follows: 30 Egyptians, 15 French, two
Iraqis, and one each from the UK, Belgium, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia,
Sudan, Chad, Portugal, Algeria and Canada. No names or identities
have been issued as yet.
No
Emergency Call
No
emergency call was made by captain or crew suggesting a sudden
and catastrophic disabling event. Rather curiously
EgyptAir reported that two hours after the planes disappearance from
radio and radar contact (4.25 local time) the planes emergency beacon
signal was received, presumably because it was still afloat?
Of
course this is but the latest of a series of disastrous aircraft
losses in 'terrorist' or otherwise suspiciously unexplained
circumstances over recent years. There appears to have been a spate
of them with recurring features that raise serious questions of air
security, safety and what actually is the true cause and motivating
factors.
ACARS
(Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System).
It
is reported that the Acars system recorded the following technical
faults that probably suggest explosion within the cabin:
00:26Z
3044 ANTI ICE R WINDOW
00:26Z
561200 R SLIDING WINDOW SENSOR
00:26Z
2600 SMOKE LAVATORY SMOKE
00:27Z
2600 AVIONICS SMOKE
00:28Z
561100 R FIXED WINDOW SENSOR
00:29Z
2200 AUTO FLT FCU 2 FAULT
00:29Z
2700 F/CTL SEC 3 FAULT
Only
an aviation expert can properly interpret these readings but they
appear to suggest an explosion or fire of some sort within the cabin.
Fire alarms were set off within the toilets apparently. It
shows that smoke was detected in the aircraft lavatory at 2.26 am,
with a second sensor going off a minute later with further faults
until 2.29 am, when the system ceased recording. The
final two alerts from the plane indicate faults with the FCU - the
flight control unit used by the pilot to input instructions into the
flight computer - and the SEC 3 - the computer that controls the
plane's spoilers and elevator computers.
At
00.29am GMT (2.29 am local time), the aircraft was over the exit
point of the Athens FIR, and at 00.29.40am GMT, it vanished from
radar. These two reports fit and suggest the plane disappeared from
radar at the same time the ACARS system report the smoke and other
problems. However it conflicts with the report (below) that it
disappeared at 2.45 am. Which is to be believed?
If
the latter it would suggest that the plane continued flying for a
further 19 minutes before being lost to radar at 2.45 am local time
without any communication from the Captain! They
do not explain the failure of the captain to respond to Greek air
traffic control or send out a mayday call or the time lapse between
that and the crash itself, nor indeed the final extraordinary
trajectory in its last moments.
Trajectory
The
plane made “sudden swerves” before dropping off radar over the
Mediterranean, reportedly making a 90-degree turn left, and dropping
from 37,000 feet to 15,000 feet before swerving 360 degrees right. No
explanation has yet been given for these
extraordinary manoeuvres that will not become clear
until the 'black boxes' have been recovered (if they are).
Debris
Found
Rather
strangely, it is reported that debris has been found miles SE
of the planes last located position. If the map below can be relied
upon this is some 500 miles from its last known position. Given the
trajectory of the last moments of the plane, this distance could only
be explained by ocean drift for which there has been insufficient
time. See map below.
Impact
of 9/11 'Hi-Jackings'
No
consideration of this important subject can ignore the events of 9/11
in America that set the scene for misrepresentation of events
involving aircraft and their use by 'terrorists'. The 19
'terrorists', mainly of Saudi nationality, blamed for hi-jacking and
flying the four 'planes' (at least one (at the Pentagon) was clearly
NOT a plane but a missile!) could NOT have done the job, as they
could scarcely fly a Cessna. This means that there must be some
other explanation for the aircraft and that in fact they were
different - probably unpiloted military - aircraft entirely. This is
supported by what photographic evidence there is of the second
aircraft to strike the North Tower.
All
this of course is very old ground with much else besides, but it
serves to prove that America was prepared, and technically able, to
sabotage aircraft, indifferent to the consequences to life and
property, in order to pursue aggressive warfare abroad. We, the
people of the world should never forget this most fundamental lesson.
There is clear circumstantial evidence that the scurrilous
technique has been repeated in other 'terrorist events' on the ground
or in the air, either by the same caucus or by subsidiary
or aligned parties working in concert.
International
Problem
This
is a profoundly serious situation that the international community
needs to address, but appears singularly unwilling to do so. Instead
it prefers to support the untenable fabrications put out by
government. This particularly applies to 9/11 but also to later
events that all appear to support a narrative intended to exacerbate
relations between western powers and essentially Muslim countries and
Russia, although China is not far behind.
So
what events that demonstrate disinformation that undermine
credibility in the stated explanations and may point to dark causes
by date and topic in receding order do I have in mind? Many of these
have been previously discussed on this blog site and elsewhere. (The
search box in the top left corner will turn them up if anyone wishes
to pursue them) In the meantime here is my list.
A
Few Recent Suspicious/Disastrous Events
DATE.
EVENT.
18.5.16 EgyptAir (flight MS804) Airbus A320 south of Greek island of Karpathos. Cause undetermined.
17.5.16 A Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) Italian-made training aircraft crash in a paddy field in Nenasi, near here this afternoon. Unspecified technical difficulties.
29.4.16 CHC Helikopter Service Eurocopter EC225 Super Puma helicopter. Mechanical failure.
24.4.16 Germanwings Airbus A320 4U 9525 over the Alps. Pilot blamed (suicide)
22.3.16 Two suicide bombers, carrying explosives in large suitcases, attacked a
departure hall at Brussels Airport in Zaventem.Location: Brussels Airport in
Zaventem plus bomb on tube. ISIS terrorists blamed.
9.2.16 Two Meridian-branded passenger trains were involved in a head-on collision at Bad Aibling in southeastern Germany. Human error blamed.
13.11.15 Paris suicide bombing/shooting. ISIS terrorists.
31.10.15 Russian Airbus A321, KGL9628 flying from Sharm el-Sheikh to Moscow crashes over Sinai. ISIS bomb blamed.
17.8.15 Jakarta, Indonesia (CNN) Indonesian Trigana's ATR 42-300 turboprop aircraft before it lost contact Sunday down in a mountainous area. The loss Sunday of the Trigana plane is Indonesia's third air disaster in less than eight months.
In December, AirAsia Flight QZ8501 went down in the Java Sea while headed from Surabaya, Indonesia, to Singapore. All 162 people on board were killed. And in June, an Indonesian military transport plane crashed soon after taking off from the city of Medan, killing at least 135 people.
14.1.15 Charlie Hebdo shooting, Paris. ISIS gunmen.
17.7.15 Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 Flight MH17 crashed after being hit by a Russian-made Buk missile over eastern Ukraine. Russian-backed separatists blamed
8.3.14 Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370/MAS370) disappears over S China sea. Cause remains unknown. Blamed on pilots initially.
In virtually every one of these the official explanations do not add up in one form or another.
For
a world-wide list of allegedly ISIS attacks or those claimed by them
see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_linked_to_ISIL
Also: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/
Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_airliner_bombing_attacks
Distinguishing
Between the Genuine and Fake
We
have become somewhat used to catastrophic aeroplane accidents in
recent years, circumstances that range through relatively
straightforward mechanical or human errors, through 'terrorist'
events, to those that rather bizarrely, defy all reasonable
explanation.
Where
a logical or truthful explanation is not forthcoming, it provides the
opportunity for more 'exotic' ones, including intentional acts by
governments in pursuit of some political or military objective.
Despite
all the 'fog and mirrors' that surround such events, one thing you
can be sure of, the culprits are unlikely to admit responsibility and
where they do, no one can be sure if it can be relied upon or that it
reflects the true perpetrator. Since 9/11 at least we have all
learned to be highly sceptical and suspicious of official
explanations of tragic events. That may be the only good thing to
come out of it.
The
problem is distinguishing between the 'genuine' terrorist event,
organised and perpetrated by disaffected individuals or groups
independent of government and those carried out by government
agencies to be blamed on the named terrorist group - currently most
commonly 'ISIS'. The fact that in large measure ISIS is a front
organisation for western interests, set up, financed, encouraged and
controlled by the west and its allies in the Middle East, of course
takes us full circle in a very murky, discreditable business. By and
large, it is nation states with the technical expertise, the trained
men, the munitions, to carry out these sophisticated operations,
including the propaganda to sell the approved version, rather than
disorganised and virtually illiterate individuals and groups.
An
unusual feature in several of these aircraft incidents, is the
erratic or hard to explain events that happen immediately before the
crash. First gaining altitude before precipitous loss of same. Also
the common loss of communication and lack of emergency procedures. In
the case of MH370 a sudden increase in altitude followed by a very
untypical maneuver. In the case of MH17 a very unconvincing
explanation for the crash. In the GermanWings case an increase in
altitude before setting the autopilot (why autopilot?) to a crash
trajectory. Then even more strangely ineffective attempts to pull up
using the joystick? Questions as to cause in the Russian Airbus A321
crash suspiciously close to an Israeli communications base. Now with
the EgyptAir crash reports of erratic flight-path movements before
falling from 38,000 ft.
Remote
Control of Aircraft Systems
Those investigating the
causes of crashes or incidents have a difficult job especially when
wreckage has to be retrieved (if it can be located) from the oceans.
But since the beginning of the 21st Century, and particularly the
events of 9/11, the potential for remote control of aircraft systems
can never be ruled out, nor covert action by those with the technical
capability, to be blamed on those not responsible, or acting covertly
for the very agencies that blame them! We shall have to wait and see
whether this latest example fits the mould. Egypt and its economy,
largely dependant on tourism, and playing into the hands of an
Israeli/Saudi connection, certainly appears to be a target at the
moment. Nor can Paris, target of two major terrorist incidents, be
forgotten. If the cause of the crash was an explosive device, the
question of airport security and who is/was responsible for it (a
major issue in the Brussels Airport incident) when Paris was on a
heightened terrorist security alert, must be a big issue.
The
Environmental and Social Implications of Air Travel
The
world is now, for the first time in human history, subject to
continuous aircraft activity, allowing people to travel from one
place to another as never before, but not without some very serious
consequences to the atmosphere, land and sea. Atmospheric pollution,
noise and development all result. Some of the issues have been
brought into sharp focus in the matter of the controversial third
runway at London's Heathrow airport, held up by excessive NOX (oxides
of nitrogen) and other pollutants but replicated in cities around the
world where planes land and take off.
The contamination
of the atmosphere in the form of 'chemtrails', either from the
products of fuel combustion or active 'seeding' with chemicals to
affect weather patterns, not to mention the matter of fuel dumping or
even the part aircraft play in the delivery of explosives in warfare,
are all hot topics with which we cannot afford to be complacent. All
talk is about CO2 which conveniently detracts and distracts from
these issues, that see no sign of anything but getting worse before
they get better.
Aircraft Crashes Recorded
The
complex nature of the subject is best illustrated by reference to
visual representation and facts
here: http://aviation.globalincidentmap.com/. You
will see that in May so far this year, no less than fifty four crash
or emergency landing incidents are recorded, most of which get
cursory or no mention on global news channels. Only the incidents
involving a large loss of life or notable personages, tend to get
wide publicity. Of course the whole issue of how 'news stories' are
covered or not covered, is a subject in itself. Nor should we be
naive enough to rule out the possibility that government may have had
a big hand in manipulating it. Indeed I believe this should be the
first question to be posed when blanket coverage is given to an
incident and its stated cause.
So we should first establish
the fact that there are indeed thousands of potentially dangerous
incidents happening all the time and that these seldom get high
profile attention from the media. Even the stories of large scale
tragedies quickly become 'old news' and pass into history. Government
through its accident investigation agencies tend to control the
narrative and few challenge it. In this way false information can be
promulgated and perpetuated. The incidents listed above and below may
be exceptional and unrepresentative of a much bigger topic of air
accidents but they have been chosen precisely for this reason and to
illustrate the way they have been used for a particular political
purpose.
Germanwings
Flight 9525 crash
The
Mail has this:"A
new twist in the tragic saga of the doomed Germanwings plane - which
crashed with the loss of 150 lives in the French Alps in March -
indicates killer pilot Andreas Lubitz may have tried to save the
aircraft at the last minute.
Just 93 seconds before the Airbus
jetliner slammed into the mountainside the black box flight recorders
showed Lubitz, 27, apparently trying to override the automatic
descent mechanism which he triggered when captain Patrick
Sondenheimer left the cockpit to use the toilet.
Lubitz,
plagued by depression and suicidal thoughts, locked the captain out
of the flight deck so he could put his suicide plan into play.
But,
according to French air safety investigators who released a 29-page
interim report on Wednesday about the crash based on black box data
of the doomed Germanwings Flight 4U9525, there is evidence that he
tried to manually take charge of the aircraft again shortly before
the crash."
This data shows that there was a movement of the
sidestick of the Airbus A-320. In the log it says 'between
10:39:33 and 10:40:07 there was a recorded sidestick input (manual
movement) with low amplitude (vibrations) on the co-pilot side.'
In
the 'conclusions' of the report this is summed up: 'One minute and 33
seconds before impact the FDR (flight data recorder) recorded a
control input of 30 seconds on the right side stick controller, who
was not strong enough to turn off the autopilot.'
Prof.
Elmar Giemulla, a lawyer for victims and an expert on air travel law,
told German newspaper Bild that
'we will never know what moved him in these seconds'. She added that
a 'stronger pressure on the side stick' would have automatically
disabled the autopilot."
31st
October, 2015. Russian Airbus
A321, KGL9628 flying from Sharm
el-Sheikh to
Moscow crashes over Sinai.
Operated
by the Russian airline Kogalymavia.
Owned and leased from Irish company. Assembled Germany
1997. Took
off from Sharm el-Sheikh airport at 05:58 (03:58 GMT) on
31 October, 2015. At 06:14 Egyptian time (04:14 GMT), the plane
failed to make scheduled contact with air traffic control based in
Larnaca, Cyprus. The plane disappeared from radar screens six
minutes later while flying over central Sinai. Egyptian authorities
said no SOS calls were received by air traffic controllers. All on
board (224) killed.
Islamic
State (IS) affiliate,
known as 'Sinai Province' take responsibility for bringing down
plane. In this article
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25882504) the
BBC portrays the group as a terrorist group with parallel aims and
philosophy to ISIS, including the creation of sophisticated
propaganda film, having carried out more than 31 attacks in 2016
alone. It does not answer the question who funds and controls it, or
why in this arid vast space the alleged 'training camps', cannot be
located and 'neutralised' by either Israel or Egyptian military if so
desired.
Without
any substantiation of any link, Egyptian efforts to isolate Gaza
are highlighted, as if Gaza didn't have enough problems already! The
suspicion must lurk that just like ISIS, Sinai
Province it
is a front for and construct of, American/Israeli/Saudi policy. At a
most basic level, what advantage could there be for Arab 'freedom
fighters' to further inflame a major power like Russia, that could
only add to its woes?
The following is taken from
Christopher Bollyn's web page here:
http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15282
The
Russian aircraft went down south of Al Arish, near the border of
Israel, very close to Israel's main cyber warfare and computer
hacking facility, Unit 8200, located on Kibbutz Urim. Cyber warfare
is defined as "actions by a nation-state to penetrate another
nation's computers or networks for the purposes of causing damage or
disruption." Graphic: The Telegraph.
MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT 8200 - Israel's main satellite signal intelligence facility is located on Kibbutz Urim, less than 60 miles NNE of the location where the Russian plane went down. Unit 8200, an institution of computer hackers, is the largest branch of the IDF and is responsible for the military’s offensive cyber capabilities. The Telegraph reported in 2010, "The Negev desert based Unit 8200 has evolved from the signal intelligence arm of the Israeli military into a respected leader in high technology warfare."
- See more at: http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15282 http://www.bollyn.com/
Legal moves to seek 9/11 compensation from Iraq!!!! Quotes from other sources for information:
"Kreindler
& Kreindler represented
many of the 9/11 victims, both in the victim's compensation
fund and in litigation against the security companies and
airlines. The firm took a leading role in challenging,
unsuccessfully, what it claimed was a de facto cap on payments in the
VCF, based on the regulations and comments made by VCF Special Master
Kenneth Feinberg. The firm also brought litigation against the
terrorists and individuals and entities it claimed were terrorist
sponsors. This included a lawsuit for several billion dollars against
Iraq, based on an allegation that Iraqi officials were aware of plans
to attack
America." From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreindler_%26_Kreindler
"Kreindler
& Kreindler Law Firm is a Cynical CIA Psyop Tool" -
I originally posted this data in 2006. My motto: "The cover-up
proves the crime." K&K is on intimate terms with the CIA,
and has been central to covering up a score of covert ops/mass
murders. K&K was also, as documented, instrumental in selling the
American public on the Iraq War with a psychological operation
falsely linking Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and the A-Bomb. Fox News: "
... Kreindler & Kreindler, a Park Ave. law firm that has been
working overtime to establish a money trail leading from Saddam
Inc.’s amassed loot to al-Qaeda’s coffers. ... " Yes, it's
that kind of law firm ... Jim Kreindler on 9/11: "Immediately I
suspected a terrorist attack and I found myself thinking about
another terrorist event that dominated the attention of our law firm
since 1988 – the bombing of Pan Am 103 by operatives
of
the Libyan government. ... " Sure-sure ...
From: http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/flight-3407-kreindler-kreindler-cons.html
"For example, while representing 9/11 victims, New York’s Kreindler & Kreindler law firm filed a Freedom of Information request for a copy of a May 2000 memo about a meeting OFAC officials had with two of Osama bin Laden’s half-brothers, as well as a subsequent letter about the meeting from the Saudi Binladin Group, the large construction conglomerate founded by Osama bin Laden’s father. Both documents are cited in the 9/11 Commission’s report."
OFAC denied the 2009 request saying, among other things, that the release of those records would constitute “a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,” presumably of the bin Ladens.
OFAC also asserted personal privacy and national security considerations in 2006 when refusing to release nearly 700 pages of records about the International Islamic Relief Organization, a Saudi charity whose branches in Indonesia and the Philippines were specially designated by OFAC as terrorist entities for funding al Qaeda." From: http://www.floridabulldog.org/2015/09/9-11-anniversary-secret-records-fbi-cia-terrorist-attacks/
"One June 28, 2013, WMR reported on another CIA base, the Pinal Air Park/Marana Airfield outside of Tucson, Arizona. It was this facility that drew the interest of retired Boeing 757 and 767 pilot, Iran-contra CIA contractor pilot, and 9/11 author Phil Marshall. In January 2013, the Calaveras County Sheriff’s Department concluded, after a botched investigation, that Marshall shot himself to death after having shot and killed his two teen-age children and the family dog. Pinal is the home to America’s “boneyard” of retired civilian aircraft, including Boeing passenger aircraft. Nearby Davis-Monthan Air Force Base is the home to the boneyard of retired military aircraft. In addition, the CIA and U.S. Special Forces maintain operations at Pinal, the CIA through its contractor, Evergreen International. A former CIA official who was involved in the CIA’s planning of the Iran-contra “arms-for-hostages; Iranian profits for the contras” operation confirmed that Evergreen had a close working relationship with the firm PTech, a firm with connections to the Saudi royal family and Israel’s Mossad and which had contracts to provide computer software support to the Department of Defense, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Justice, FBI, and the Secret Service from 1997 until 9/11. The firm continues to provide software support for classified U.S. military projects." From: http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/14079#sthash.7iIqikYL.dpuf
"WMR has learned from a number of sources who are familiar with the operations of Moyock, Harvey Point, and Pinal that the three secret installations played a part in the planning and carrying out of the 9/11 attacks. Pinal provided the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft that were retrofitted to be flown remotely into the World Trade Center’s North and South Towers. WMR has not confirmed whether the Boeing 757 that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, was remotely-flown but there were no bodies spotted or recovered by the Somerset County coroner after the crash." From: http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/14079
http://www.bollyn.com/
SOME INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS ON THE NUMEROLOGY OF TERRORIST
EVENTS
"Published on 19 May 2016
The May 19, 2016 story of missing EgyptAir Flight 804 is contrived bullshit. There is no such plane, it never existed. This story is directly connected to the missing plane story of MH-370 from March 8, 2014, another plane that never existed. Learn about how the Jews and Masons who control the media stage these incidents and contrive these stories for the sake of agenda and ongoing riddles leading up to bigger events. Read more below:"
HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP4E4-6AzRM
AND STRANGE COINCIDENCES HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=145&v=I6vYdKaHwFg
SIMULTANEOUS MILITARY EXERCISES: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-KsA1_Vv90
