Tuesday, 19 January 2021

 Israeli spies inside British Labour Party?


"If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." Is he still working for Israeli Intelligence inside the Labour machine? I guess the answer to that must be 'Yes'?


Following article taken from:


https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/uk-labour-party-hires-former-israeli-spy?fbclid=IwAR1Y5_ps3AeDXlMPUzh3Ba_VheOp1TipgDcLQmSj6WylSHotAx9Quo9pQP4


UK Labour Party hires former Israeli spy

Unit 8200 veteran Assaf Kaplan. (IRI/Facebook)



The UK Labour Party has hired a former Israeli spy to help manage its social media, The Electronic Intifada can reveal.

Assaf Kaplan will work in the office of Labour leader Keir Starmer, a source with knowledge of the hire said.

Kaplan was in Israeli military intelligence for nearly five years, an officer in Unit 8200, its cyberwarfare branch.

Unit 8200 specializes in spying, hacking and encryption. It carries out blackmail, mass surveillance and systematic discrimination against Palestinians.

In 2014, a group of whistleblowers detailed how the unit spies on Palestinian civilians living under Israeli military occupation.

According to his LinkedIn profile, Kaplan was in the Israeli army’s military intelligence division from May 2009 to November 2013.

He was a Unit 8200 intelligence analyst and later an officer.


This likely coincided with the period when 8200 was carrying out the type of crimes exposed by the whistleblowers, in a September 2014 letter to The Guardian.

Extortion, blackmail

“Any information that might enable extortion of an individual is considered relevant,” one Unit 8200 reservist explained in the letter. “Whether said individual is of a certain sexual orientation, cheating on his wife, or in need of treatment in Israel or the West Bank – he is a target for blackmail.”

Another explained that: “Any Palestinian is exposed to nonstop monitoring by the Israeli Big Brother, without legal protection, and with no way of knowing when they too would become an objective – targeted for harassment, extortion or physical injury.”

In a profile of Kaplan on an ex-employer’s website, he is proudly described as a “Unit 8200 veteran.”


The Israeli Regional Initiative’s website says Kaplan is a “Unit 8200 veteran.” (IRI)



Kaplan did not answer requests for comment.

The job he has taken was advertised by UK Labour in September last year. The following month, Kaplan announced on Facebook that he had moved to London.

He began work in December, a source told The Electronic Intifada.

His full job title is “Social Listening and Organizing Manager.” A relatively new trend in public relations, “social listening” is a way for organizations to monitor online conversations about their “brand.”

But a more blunt way to think of it would be surveillance.

Kaplan’s LinkedIn states he has experience using a “digital monitoring platform” as well as “human analysis” to keep tabs on voters in Israeli elections.

The UK Labour job listing shows that Kaplan is now responsible for leading efforts at “challenging disinformation online” about the party, as well as helping it win elections.

But Kaplan’s qualifications for winning elections are questionable.

Losing elections

His LinkedIn profile states that he was deputy head of the Israeli Labor Party’s campaign for the April 2019 general election to the country’s parliament, the Knesset.

That election saw the once dominant Israeli Labor Party collapse to just six seats.

And recent polling suggests Labor may be wiped out altogether in the Israeli election set for March.

If helping to win elections and build voter support is a qualification for the “social listening” job, then it looks like the British Labour Party picked the wrong person.

Labour’s right-wing leader Keir Starmer has obsessively purged the party of left-wing and Palestine solidarity elements since succeeding Jeremy Corbyn last year.

A multi-millionaire pro-Israel lobbyist donated $62,000 towards his leadership election campaign. But Starmer kept this secret until after he had won the party leadership.

Assaf Kaplan’s social media shows he has already established ties with UK Labour’s internal Israel lobby, as well as at least one past Israeli spy.

His Facebook profile shows he is “friends” with both Shai Masot and Michael Rubin.

Masot was the Israeli embassy agent ejected from the UK in January 2017 after being exposed for plotting against British ministers and lawmakers.

Masot also interfered in British politics by trying to secretly engineer the creation of a pro-Israel youth group within the Labour Party.

A close contact of Masot, Rubin is director of Labour Friends of Israel. In undercover footage filmed by Al Jazeera, Rubin admitted that “I knew Shai in my role at Labour Students, we did a couple of things together.”

Rubin was chair of Labour Students in February 2016, when the fabricated “Labour anti-Semitism crisis” against Jeremy Corbyn first kicked off in earnest at Oxford University.

Rubin secretly conducted Labour’s first ever “investigation” into alleged anti-Semitism. It was such an obvious hatchet job that it was buried by the party.

But The Electronic Intifada obtained a copy and published extracts last year.

Not only did the document smear and misrepresent the pro-Corbyn Labour left at Oxford, but it included outright fabrications. Yet the report was highly influential in promoting the false “Labour anti-Semitism” narrative.

Kaplan is also followed on Twitter by Liron Velleman, an officer with the Jewish Labour Movement – another pro-Israel group which has smeared Corbyn.

Mercenary spies

Israel’s first victims are the Palestinians. But what begins with the Palestinians rarely ends there.

Unit 8200 is notorious as a factory for churning out high-tech Israeli spies, who then often flow into Israel’s privatized global spy network.

Mercenary Israeli “intelligence” firms like Black Cube and NSO Group have been linked to horrendous human rights abuses and pervasive intrusion the world over – including against Americans.

NSO Group was founded by Unit 8200 veterans and offers sophisticated spyware to repressive regimes including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Their Pegasus software can be used to hijack a person’s phone allowing spies to steal data, passwords, email and text messages, as well as listening in on phone calls and being able to turn on microphones at will.

The latest version of Pegasus to be discovered by security researchers Citizen Lab was used to spy on journalists at Al Jazeera.

Israeli companies established by Unit 8200 veterans have also been responsible for global theft of user data for commercial advantage.

One such firm was Onavo. It was marketed as a free VPN privacy tool and bought by Facebook.

But it was removed from the Apple app store after it emerged that it granted Facebook almost full visibility of a user’s data, giving the technology giant insights into consumer behavior. This ultimately led to Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp for $19 billion in 2014.

Black Cube – which is reportedly stuffed with 8200 veterans – was hired by the once powerful Hollywood producer and convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein to silence and intimidate his victims.

Unit 8200 is also a key part of Israel’s war against the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, or BDS.

Israel’s anti-BDS minister at the time Gilad Erdan met with the head of 8200 in an apparently habitual meeting, his 2016 diary showed.

Saturday, 9 January 2021

 Another Boeing 737 falls out of the sky. Another air incident involving Indonesia or Malaysia.

No cause yet identified.


https://twitter.com/niaaaloey/status/1347862096051015681?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1347862096051015681%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dw.com%2Fen%2Findonesia-sriwijaya-air-plane-missing-shortly-after-takeoff%2Fa-56178706


https://www.dw.com/en/indonesia-sriwijaya-air-plane-missing-shortly-after-takeoff/a-56178706

Boeing in trouble

Boeing manufactured the infamous 737 MAX model involved in two major crashes that killed hundreds of people in less than a year.

In October of that year, 189 people were killed when a Lion Air Boeing 737 MAX jet slammed into the Java Sea about 12 minutes after take-off from Jakarta on a routine one-hour flight.

In March 2019, an Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed after taking off from Addis Ababa. All 157 people on board died.

The model was grounded and the company was Boeing was fined $2.5 billion (€2.04 billion) over claims it defrauded regulators overseeing the 737 MAX model.

The plane that lost contact on Saturday is a much older model.

 https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=boeing+737


Boeing 777:  Malaysian Airlines . Ukraine Crash: 





Curse of Malaysia Airlines? 5 tragic moments in airline's history before MH17 and MH370




Friday, 8 January 2021

 How to be rid of a 'President' (legally).



by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

From: https://gumshoenews.com/2021/01/08/legal-ways-to-remove-a-president/

The Framers of the Constitution had a mathematical view of power. They realistically anticipated power grabs. Hence, they made sure each branch had a way to restrain the other branches.

Thus, if the Supreme Court sees the legislature passing unconstitutional laws, it can in effect void those laws. If the Supreme Court justices act wrongly, the Congress can impeach them. (In 1969, Justice Abe Fortas resigned under threat of impeachment.)

To oust bad Congresspersons or a bad president, the main check is via the ballot box. However, Congress can oust a member of its own chamber by a 2/3 vote. (In 2002, Rep Trafcant was expelled from the House by a 420-to-1 vote.)

A president can be removed by Congress – which, remember, is “the people.” He can be “impeached”– that word merely means accused — by The House of Representatives and convicted by a 2/3rd majority of the Senate.  Presidents Bill Clinton and Trump were both impeached by the House but not convicted by the Senate.

In the 234 years from 1787 to the present, Congress passed several laws, also known as statutes, to put more flesh on the way the republic could survive. One type of law they could pass would be to restrain the enormous power of monopolistic corporations. They did this in the Sherman Ant-Trust Act of 1890.

They could also pass a law to restrain foreign involvement in the US government.  In September 2018, President Trump wrote an Executive Order about that, and subsequently Congress enacted the relevant provisions – as no president can make law via executive orders. As stated in Article I, section 8 clause 18:

“The Congress shall have Power to … make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution … all… Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States or any Department thereof.”

Impeaching President Trump Today

Congress can impeach President Donald Trump now, even though he has only 13 more days in office. The House would have to write up one or more “Articles of Impeachment.” If a majority of the 435 members vote Yes, the case goes to the Senate.

Article II, section 4, says “The President, Vice President, and all Civil Officers of the United States … shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

As recently as January 2020, the House impeached Trump. When it got to the Senate, the Senate took a “vote on procedure” as to whether evidence would be listened to. They voted No. On the vote to convict, they voted No.

There is no due process and the crimes do not have to be crimes on the books.  It is a political affair.

Another way that a president might get “removed,” is for Congress or other persons to pressure him to resign. This is what happened to Richard Nixon in 1974.

The 25th Amendment

What if a president has not done anything wrong but has become mentally ill or otherwise incapacitated? Until 1967 there was no constitutional provision. In that year the 25th Amendment was ratified.  It provides for a temporary transfer of power from the President to the vice president,

(Reagan in 1985 and George W Bush in 2002 used it for a short-term medical absence.)

The 25th Amendment also provides for involuntary transfer of power, as follows:

“Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide [Congress hasn’t done so], transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

“Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session.

“If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office”.

Note: This provision has never been used.

Bringing Criminal Charges against a President

No US citizen, including a president, is above the law. Criminal charges may be brought. It is, at present, the  “policy” of the Department of Justice to refrain from indicting a president.  But policy is not binding.

States can also charge a president with crime.  New York’s Attorney General is currently investigating President Trump for possible tax or other crime. Note, however, that indicting or even convicting a president of a crime does not entail his removal from office.

Note: any of the legal methods of trying to remove a president from office can be misused. That is, they can be employed as a form of harassment or as a power grab. The Constitution’s checks and balances does not adequately prevent that. However, the people can weigh in, in whatever manner they wish if they disapprove of an attempt to remove a president.

The people always have ultimate say.

Commentary by Mary Maxwell (not by the Founding Fathers, although She Never Strays Far)

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, has just announced, on January 7, 2021 at around 4pm, that she wants to use impeachment and/or the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump.

It appears to me that the most efficient method would be impeachment.  The four-day delay in the 25th amendment would mean a 9-day (or less) presidency of Mike Pence. In any case, Pelosi does not have authority to start the 25th Amendment procedure, but she does for impeachment.

I might mention that if they impeached both Trump and Pence simultaneously, the Speaker of the House would immediately become President of the United States. Also  I forgot to say that President Trump may decide to resign, perhaps in order to get a pardon, from Pence. (Nixon got one from Gerald Ford.)

The Fraudulent Election

As far as I can tell, from reading the evidence, Trump did win the 2020 election. That is, he won enough votes to have achieved at least the minimum number of Electoral College votes (270) on November 3, if the states had declared the numbers honestly.

I believe there was massive cheating, for which particular “software” was the key element. (I also think that happens routinely in US elections – see the 1992 book by Jim Collier entitled Votescam.)

It is clear that this information is being suppressed.  Meanwhile, the media have gone to great lengths to make sure the public gets the impression that Trump’s clams of victory are false.

Thus, someone who arranged the cheating in the first place, plus the media, are tied into electoral fraud — which is a federal crime calling for penalty of up to 5 years imprisonment.

Now I ask: How many of the 535 Congresspersons are also indictable for this same crime, as accomplices to the mind-blowing activity that began at 1pm on January 6, 2021 in the Hall of Congress?  (I am not referring to the crowd’s behavior, which began later.) They all – with a few exceptions – made mincemeat of the law.

This took the form of legislators misstating – loudly, vociferously – the law that is codified at 3 USC 15. It says that when the ballots are opened in the presence of the President of the Senate, that person can reject any that are not authentic.

Surely that means any that were left unsigned by the Elector, or any that had a signature such as “Jesus Christ.” Or any that purported to come from a state called “Ruritania.” Such, being not authentic, could be thrown out on the authority of Pence without taking a vote.

No such “doozies” did appear on January 6, so that part of the ceremony was over.  The next part was for Pence to ask if there were objections. He properly did so, and a few “brave” (what an awful word) Reps and Senators came forward.  At this stage they could object to something substantive, such as the candidate on the ballot is less than 35 years of age, hence ineligible for the presidency. They could also have discussed “software problems” – see below.

Pence was required to deal alphabetically, by the state from which the Electors had done their December 14th balloting. Hence, he took care of Alabama and Alaska, to which there were no objections. Next was Arizona to which at least one senator and one rep (as is required by law) gave an objection.

Around that time, the break-in by rioters began, so the task was postponed. At 8pm, Congress reconvened and finished all the states.  Various objections were raised, and this meant each chamber had to vote on whether they agreed with the objection.  No objection garnered the needed majority vote — in either chamber.

Does Trump Deserve Removal from Office?

Here I will hold forth only on the question of Trump’s behavior in relation to the rioter’s breaching the Capitol Building.  I am not well placed to comment as I have so far not been able to find a video of hm egging the people on.  Some say he did, some say he didn’t.  So I can only offer a hypothetical “ruling.”

To repeat, I do not know if he instructed his supporters to do anything violent or illegal.  If he did, punishment would be appropriate. If he didn’t, the whole harass-the-president thing is a disgrace. And for people to say that a crowd should not rally is the heresy of the century!!!

However, as I said in yesterday’s article at GumshoeNews.com, I personally hold it against Trump that he did not get the word out about the software, and did not get the word out about Mike Flynn’s alleged arrest of CIA Director Gina Haspel. We need to know.  How could it possibly be a secret? Who does he think he is?

To me, he is the guy who can’t bother to scratch the names of Leonard Peltier and Julian Assange on his pardon pad, but can set free a group of war criminals.

I also said I’d like to punish Trump for not punishing Barr.  A sin of omission, so to speak.

Wednesday, 6 January 2021

 Tim Veater

If there is a new Covid 'Ninja' variant, how will the un-proven vaccine based on the old one, work?
  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1h
  • Tim Veater
     Dr Julian W Tang, Honorary Associate Professor/Clinical Virologist at the University of Leicester, said:
    “The South African variant (B.1.351 or 501Y.V2) differs significantly from the UK B.1.1.7(variant) in several ways that may impact on vaccine effectiveness.
    “Both variants share the N501Y mutation in the viral S gene which lies in the receptor binding domain (RBD) – where the virus binds to the host cell – and where vaccine-induced antibodies bind to the virus. But the South African variant has two more mutations – E484K and K417N – in this RBD region that are absent in the UK variant. These two additional mutations may interfere more with vaccine effectiveness in the South African variant than in the UK variant.
    “This does not mean that the existing COVID-19 vaccines will not work at all, just that the antibodies induced by the current vaccines may not bind and neutralise the South African variant as well as it would the other circulating viruses – including the UK variant.
    “Even if the South African variant becomes more widespread and dominant, the mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and adenovirus-vectored (Oxford-Astrazeneca and Russian Sputnik V) vaccines can be modified to be more close-fitting and effective against this variant in a few months.
    “Meanwhile, most of us believe that the existing vaccines are likely to work to some extent to reduce infection/ transmission rates and severe disease against both the UK and South African variants – as the various mutations have not altered the S protein shape that the current vaccine induced antibodies will not bind at all.
    expert reaction to the South African variant | Science Media Centre
    SCIENCEMEDIACENTRE.ORG
    expert reaction to the South African variant | Science Media Centre
    expert reaction to the South African variant | Science Media Centre
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 19m
  • Thanks for that. The times reported last week that not one but 2700 mutations had been recorded to covid in S.Africa! What?!!!! What a nonsense this whole debate is as I have said from the very beginning. Positive PCR tests are being equated with manifestation of illness. People are alleged to have died from covid when it was caused by something else. The numbers have been exaggerated and misrepresented. Children are claimed to be at risk when they are not. All in all, this is the greatest media fraud ever perpetrated by government on the British people, and our parliamentary system, unnecessarily hobbled by the fabricated threat, has been totally ineffective in protecting the human rights of the people or challenging the official narrative. As everyone should by now realise, it is lock-down that is killing many times more people, than a microscopic rna entity.
The CT Is The Key To The Pandemic
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing “positive” for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study6 in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study.7
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
percentage of positive viral culture
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
0.001112 is the death rate
The CDC and ONS say it is 6% of the 66,453 have died only of Covid, no other morbidity so it is 0.000664%

This from 2018 BBC News:
'The rate of hospital admissions in England rose by over 50% in the first week of January to 7.38 per 100,000.'
'Around 5,000 people were admitted to hospital with flu in the first week of January - Prof Paul Cosford, medical director from Public Health England, said: "The levels of flu being seen are high and of course that is contributing to the pressures in the NHS, ***but they are not *unprecedented* levels***."' = ??
Compared to end of December to January 2020-2021:
'On Monday 28 December, 3,075 patients were admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (2 January saw 3,145 admissions)' = If 2018 Covid figures were not at "unprecedented levels" then 2020 is equally nowhere near.
And, it's not like they can claim flu cases are exasperating admissions: Allegedly, there have been only minimal cases of flu in UK this year [2020]:
'The number of acute respiratory infection incidents *in England* was 922 in week 51, compared to 860 in the previous week.'
WE ARE BEING FED (GARBAGE).


Figures for 2016 - 2018



In 2019, there were 530,841 deaths registered in England and Wales.

Using the Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional, as at week 46 (13th November 2020) 529,928 registered deaths in England and Wales.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/totaldeathsin2019and2020sofarintheuk#:~:text=Using%20the%20Deaths%20registered%20weekly,2019%20in%20late%20January%202021.