A terror attack planned?

A terror attack planned? 

"Thirty-nine options"

Operation Sea Eagle 2019 is on Oct 23-24, 2019 “9/11 op” in 5 EU countries, unless exposed

By Crypto_sverige | Crypto Sverige | 11 hours ago

From: https://www.publish0x.com/crypto-sverige/sea-eagle-2019-oct-23-24-2019-911-op-5-eu-countries-unless-e-xvzxeo

---

Journalist and whistleblower Ole Dammegard has released urgent information from Ola Slettermark, an EU-based individual previously associated with an April 7, 2017 synthetic Terror EU false flag attack, who is reportedly claiming that Sea Eagle 2019, a possible 9/11-type false flag operation, is tentatively planned under the guise of disaster drills for the Oct 23-24, 2019 period unless exposed, hitting “39 targets in the following five EU cities”:

London UK

Manchester UK

Barcelona Spain

Paris France

Rotterdam Netherlands

In addition, Ola Slettermark’s reported information indicates that two (2) nuclear power plants may be the targets of a synthetic Terror attack in Sweden within 36 hours of the main Operation Sea Eagle 2019 attack, with an estimated 1600 persons present at planned disaster drills at this location.

Ole Dammegard’s research has shown that Synthetic Terror attacks are often planned in the guise of disaster preparedness drills as appears to be the case with Operation Sea Eagle 2019.

Purpose of Synthetic Terror attacks

 If verified, the purpose of the planned Synthetic terror attacks include social disruption, as well as the imposition of martial law and substantive controls on free speech and publication on the Internet and elsewhere in civil society, according to Ole Dammegard.

Source Documents of Operation Sea Eagle 2019

 Source documents obtained by Ole Dammegard from Ola Slattermark and provided to NewsInsideOut.com and published from the original in Swedish include:

“Ola Slettermark – and sees that they will have an exercise October 23-24

http://www.samverkanstockholmsregionen.se/kalendarium

“23-24 Oct – EXERCISE Sea Eagle

When: Oct 23 – 24, 2019

“Description: The management team in the Stockholm Cooperation Region has jointly decided that the county’s players will participate in the Sea Eagle Exercise 2019. It is highlighted, partly as an important preparatory step for TFÖ 2020, and as an important activity to achieve the ambition in the common target image 2019-2022 .

“Sea Eagle 2019 is designed as a broad simulation exercise. It contains elements of gray-zone problems, with extensive social disturbances, disinformation and informational impacts and elements of serious antagonistic acts. The various exercises will highlight possible challenges for society’s crisis preparedness capacity and will place demands on the region’s ability to act in a coordinated manner at agreed levels of cooperation. The scenario will provide the conditions for practicing, testing and continuing to develop areas of ability within the state civil service, emergency preparedness and civil defense. In preparation for the main exercise, a number of knowledge-enhancing measures will be implemented. The main exercise will take place on October 23-24 and will last for 36 hours, which provides opportunities for each player to test their ability to endure.

Ola Slettermark Oct 6:

“On the way to Barcelona and the last steering group meeting within the int. proj we participate in. On November 15, @MayorofLondon launches the result and launch of the “Counter Terrorism Preparedness Network” where @samverkan_sthlm is part of London, Barcelona, ​​Paris, Rotterdam Manchester. #CTPNS”

"The madness of King George."

 Absolute History

124,685 views

•Oct 11, 2019

A new video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FNoNVXnSjo

Absolute History

187K subscribers

SUBSCRIBE

For 56 years Prince Charles has been the king in waiting – a wait that has surely been hard on him. Against the background of his wedding to Camilla the film examines his controversial ideas on architecture (nothing too modern, please), on medicine (coffee enemas and a diet of liquidised fruit) and on religion (flirting with Islam, Sikhism and regularly visiting the Greek orthodox monasteries on Mount Athos). Looking at the heir to the throne's difficult relationships with women, family and the public, we find out what makes Charles tick.

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&sxsrf=ACYBGNRnhee_Dj23LL2mLjqkQf6iGUYMpQ:1571661708120&q=prince+charles+images&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjw6saOsK3lAhUKQ8AKHcZxDusQ7Al6BAgGEDs&biw=1280&bih=881#imgrc=6rnOhpB2EeSkrM:

SUBSCRIBE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FNoNVXnSjo

"For 56 years Prince Charles has been the king in waiting – a wait that has surely been hard on him. Against the background of his wedding to Camilla the film examines his controversial ideas on architecture (nothing too modern, please), on medicine (coffee enemas and a diet of liquidised fruit) and on religion (flirting with Islam, Sikhism and regularly visiting the Greek orthodox monasteries on Mount Athos). Looking at the heir to the throne's difficult relationships with women, family and the public, we find out what makes Charles tick." Content licensed from TVF International. Any queries, please contact us at: owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com

An alternative and more accurate synopsis may be to discredit the heir to the throne and pour scorn on his behaviour and ideas!  I asked a few questions and made a few observations for what they are worth. Hopefully there are no 'dark forces' behind the scenes (or schemes).

In time of Brexit and ineffective government, when the indomitable monarch is in her 94th year, this video appears, clearly adopting the cliched theme to undermine the Prince of Wales as next in line to the throne. One wonders who is behind it? Wikipedia has this quote about TVF International - intriguingly a 'private company': "TVF was described by the Hereford Times as "the UK's leading distributor of documentaries" which seem like damning with faint praise. Because it is 'private' who commissioned, financed, produced and directed is not immediately transparent. Perhaps a journalist somewhere would like to enquire?

It seems that 'Little Dot Studios' is the creator. From its web site we have this: "Representing more TV shows on YouTube than any other company, Little Dot Studios attracts audiences of over 2.5 billion views every month to premium television and sports content." Also "Little Dot owns and operates numerous video channels across diverse genres. These channels broadcast across multiple digital platforms and include produced, licensed and commissioned content."

Also "We are the largest distributor of children’s television on YouTube managing more than 40 channels of dedicated kids TV content, including many of the world’s biggest kids brands."

"Little Dot Studios was launched in April 2013 by Andy Taylor and Selma Turajlic to help production companies, broadcasters and advertisers grow audiences and revenues through online video."

So nothing sinister about the Charles programme there.

More details regarding personnel can be found here: https://www.littledotstudios.com/en-GB/Team   All appear very genuine and talented people whose only objective is the production of an ethical and commercial video product.

Some 'Absolute History' details can be found here : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr5qeBG9g7b
GtMGyHG2GzbQ  

It seems most unforthcoming about who is behind it. From its 'About' page all that is offered is this : "Welcome to Absolute History - the home of fun, shocking and curious tales from throughout history."

Why is everyone connected to this video so apparently coy?




Historical déjà vu?

With regard to the Brexit debate I'm struck by the parallels with the events in the 17th Century. 

The arrival of William of Orange and the retreat of James II in 1688, plus wars on the European mainland, freed us from Roman Catholicism and the secret control by the all-powerful French monarchical state. By virtue of victory on the battlefield and astute diplomacy, a revolutionary independence was achieved, followed by two centuries of unprecedented growth and progress. 

Perhaps we need to find another inspired Dutchman? 

As regards to the video programme above, which seems to make out the case for skipping a generation in royal succession, it has echoes, though for different reasons, the  'Exclusion Crisis' of 1679.

This was the attempt by the essentially protestant 'Country Party, later renamed 'Whigs', led by Anthony Ashley Cooper, First Earl of Shaftesbury, to exclude the Duke of York, King Charles II brother and later King James II, from the throne because of his Roman Catholicism and secret links to the French King Louis XIV. 

Sir Henry Capel summarised the general feeling of the country when he said in a parliamentary debate in the House of Commons on 27 April 1679:

From popery came the notion of a standing army and arbitrary power... Formerly the crown of Spain, and now France, supports this root of popery amongst us; but lay popery flat, and there's an end of arbitrary government and power. It is a mere chimera, or notion, without popery.

Several Bills were introduced to this effect but all narrowly failed to become law and James was crowned King in 1685 on the death of his brother.

Today the issue seems to be whether Prince Charles could properly fulfil his oath as 'Supreme Governor' of the Church of England, applied since 1534 and 'Defender of the Faith' conferred on Henry VIII by Pope Leo X in 1521 (Of course paradoxically that was the Roman Catholic faith from which Henry later established his independence) given his preference to be the defender of all faiths. 
See: https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1008027/Prince-Charles-news-abdication-king-charles-religion-later


Certainly in a multi-cultural, diverse-religion Britain, where adherence to mainstream Christianity is in precipitous decline, the issue is current and relevant. Would it lead to disestablishment of the Church of England or in the absence of a Royal Head, the primacy of the Pope?


Despite the failure of the attempt to block James II, his reign was a short one lasting only to 1688, when he was ousted by the Dutch Duke of Orange. It was marked by the vicious suppression of the Monmouth Uprising in the same year he came to the throne and general discontent with his attempt to turn Britain Catholic and subservient to France, both effectively prevented by William III.

Despite his exile in France, both James and his followers made attempts to return, including a failed assassination attempt of William in London in 1696 which reinforced his position and popularity with the majority. The Jacobite cause rumbled on, particularly in Scotland with rebellions in 1715 and 1745 which were brutally put down.

To the Stuart line which had been Kings of Scotland for many centuries we owe the union of Scotland and England, first of the Crowns with James I (and VI of Scotland) in 1603 and then when in the 1707 Act of Union the two parliaments united to form one at Westminster.

So in many respects - Royal Succession, subservience and a struggle to free ourselves from European power and tyranny, the relationship with Scotland - are all again being played out. Few I think would now argue that the 'Glorious Revolution' and the union with Scotland were not beneficial for the future progress of an empire building UK. 

Whether present day political separation from mainland Europe, and possibly Scotland if the SNP has its way, would have similar benefits in a post empire and highly competitive world, or if Prince Charles is really as mad and unsuitable for the Crown as the 'Absolute History' video attempts to make out, remains to be seen.

Social improvement but twelve decades of decline? Britain in 1900

U F O s ?



A level-headed discussion on the factual evidence of 'unidentified flying objects', its reliability and the reasons for a possible government cover-up.

Watch here :  https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=274&part=1&gen=99

or here :  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNVshdAj6ko






"Have aliens really visited us? What do they look like? Where do they come from and why are they here? Have they given us messages in Crop Circles? What historical evidence is there that aliens have been involved in the evolution or creation of humans? Is there a UFO/Alien cover up? If so, how is it kept in place?This book embodies an attempt to give some answers to the questions above, based on a compilation and distillation of evidence collected during about 15 years of ongoing research. Although this book is not written for people who are new to these topics, "newbies" and seasoned researchers alike should find something useful herein. Detailed information and over 900 references aim to give the reader a perspective on alien intervention, alien abduction, alien contact, landings and crashes. The involvement of military and intelligence interests and their influence on the so-called "Disclosure" movement is also considered. Also included is a critical look at certain prominent UFO researchers, who seem to be helping to keep certain truths obscured or marginalised.Although most or all of the information in this book has been written about elsewhere, this work attempts a synthesis of reasoned analysis which, it is hoped, will enlighten the reader and give them a new understanding about why any official type of "Disclosure" is unlikely to happen, as powerful interests need to keep their crimes covered up."  Richard D. Hall.

The Global Drug Economy

By any rational assessment drug-taking by humans is at endemic and epidemic proportions. In the USA alone, over 70,000 individuals died prematurely from drug misuse in 2017, up 10% from the previous year. One might even speculate this is hardly accidental. This scene of carnage represents a multi-trillion dollar industry both to supply and its consequences. The illicit money is coming and going somewhere. Government policies clearly haven't worked and may even have exacerbated the crisis. Time they and we faced up to the awful realities and did something about it with a completely new approach.

PHOTO: The smugglers' plans came unstuck when their yacht hit a reef and ran aground in the Abrolhos Islands off Geraldton. (Supplied: WA Police)


Australian Haul

On the 2nd September, 2019 a yacht named 'Zero', hit a reef and ran aground in the Abrolhos Islands off the Mid West coast of Australia, north of Perth. It prompted a rescue operation which uncovered a startling find. On board and partly hidden on a nearby Burton Island was over a ton of illegal drugs with a street value of more than a billion dollars! 

Two foreign nationals sailing the boat - a 51-year-old French national and a 34-year-old English man - having been arrested, are now facing court charges of attempting to smuggle more than a ton of cocaine and ecstasy into Western Australia.

Police said the drugs, totalling more than 1,000 kilograms, were found packed in 40 bags, and had an estimated street value of more than $1 billion.

Police claim they attempted to hide the 40 bags of drugs under seaweed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_drug_smuggling_into_Australia

I use this recent event to illustrate a point: this is just one small yacht of probably thousands sailing the oceans with cargo, that if it were not for a navigational error, would in all probability have gone undetected and landed its cargo. It was worth more than a billion dollars to someone. A billion dollar cargo in just one small yacht! What does that say about the value of a global trade which is both illegal and unaccounted for, let alone the dire social consequences of a drug addicted population?

Cornwall

From the other side of the world five men were convicted of trying to import 1.4 tonnes of cocaine – with a street value of £112million - in a prosecution by the National Crime Agency (NCA) in March, 2019. It was hidden in a 60ft sailing yacht escorted into Newlyn harbour 

UK nationals Nigel Clark (64), and Dean Waters (59), who had been residing in Estepona, Spain, as well as Raymond Dijkstra (27), from the Netherlands, were found guilty at Bristol Crown Court following a five week trial.  Estonian Richard Must (49) and Latvian Voldermars Gailis (21) pleaded guilty to all charges at an earlier hearing.

NCA Deputy Director Matt Horne said the huge haul was the result of a  'complex' operation. HMC Vigilant intercepted the yacht, SY Nomad, on 29th August 2018 as it was sailing towards the UK.

In July 2018  a Dutch registered yacht 'Marcia' was escorted into Newlyn harbour by UK Border Force. The man in charge of it was later cleared of helping to smuggle two tonnes of cocaine with a street value of £130m into Cornwall. The jury believed Dutchman Emile Schoemaker was not told about the drugs onboard and knew nothing of the smuggling plot, his trial at Bristol Crown Court. The boat's owner, Maarten Pieterse, previously admitted smuggling charges and will be sentenced in August.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-48773850

These are just three examples of recent cases that illustrate a hugely lucrative trade in illegal drugs. It would be naive to think that this is not other than the tip of the iceberg and a small fraction of what is actually landed via this route. Of course there are many more that go undetected by land, sea and air, sometimes about or inside the bodies of so-called 'drug mules'.

Drugs a multi-billion global industry.

The value of this trade to those behind it is truly eye watering. The cost to society, socially and economically is equally so, yet governments, worldwide, appear unable to stop or dent what appears to be an inexorable rise in the personal human consumption of drugs of one sort or another. 

Ineffective criminal controls

Police raids, the capture of smugglers as described above, fines, prisons, even in some countries capital punishment (it is said that three quarters of Iran's 300 executions a year are for drug smuggling) appear to have little effect to stem the tide. 

Yet Governments, with only a few exceptions, maintain a policy of criminalisation and ostensible opposition that is ineffective and some would argue actually exacerbates the evils associated with it.

Taking just one country, the United Kingdom, for an example, the Home Office estimates the illegal drugs market is worth over five billion GBPs. 

In addition the costs to society from crime, disruption and health treatment, have been estimated by the National Crime Agency at almost twelve billion GBPs. 

As with all estimates they may understate the financial implications and certainly take no account of such things as family breakdown and loss of economic productivity. Twenty billions happens to be the amount of tax payer's money the government has pledged to the National Health Service. What proportion of police time and resources is taken up with drug related incidents, almost invariably directed at the 'low lying fruit'? How often do we hear of so called 'Drug Lords' being brought to book?

Part of a bigger picture

Nor should we overlook the fact that illegal drugs is just a small part of drug-related human behaviour. It is comforting  to divide drugs into the legal and illegal varieties, the former to treat disease conditions, the latter unnecessary and dangerous but this will simply not do. Alcohol and nicotine are both legally available though obviously dangerous and problematic to a greater or lesser extent. Literally tons of drugs are issued via the medical profession and prescription. For example seventy million prescriptions were issued last year for anti-depressants alone, each for a week or longer. That's one prescription and multiple tablets for every resident in the country!

Addiction: a human failing

The only conclusion to be drawn from all this is that a sizable proportion of the population is addicted to drugs of one sort or another and that it is the rule rather than the exception. Humans are obviously possessed of inherently addictive and obsessive personalities. The sooner we realise this and address the fact the better. Drugs are taken across the board to relieve suffering and pain whether physical or mental. The fact that in the end they invariably cause more, does not seem to deter their application.

A new approach required

This fact alone requires a change in the way we approach the subject and our perception of it. There is no doubt it requires a fundamental philosophical change to the way drugs, both legal and illegal are viewed and treated. We also need to do some profound soul-searching as to why so many humans see the need for chemical substances in order to cope with life. What sort of world have humans created that so necessitates such reliance on drugs and how might this be reversed?

Because the drugs trade is illegal and insanely profitable, it cannot be stopped even with draconian measures. Humans are prepared to take insane risks where either physical addiction or the likelihood of riches impels. It also corrupts all other elements of society. Banks have turned a blind eye to where the cash has come from as do those who deal in property and expensive goods. Enforcement agencies are beguiled and bought off with bribes and once compromised are at the mercy of criminal manipulation through blackmail. The public of course is generally kept in the dark and is unaware as to the extent of the problem.

A reality check

The convicted, but now reformed,  drug supplier, followed by many thousands, does an important service by interviewing those directly involved on both sides of the drugs trade as well as those with experience of the criminal underworld including his own.

In his conversation with Neil Woods, an ex-undercover cop in the UK employed to identify drug networks, it is clear that although well-intentioned, police operations are actually ineffective and counterproductive. Not only did the arrest of a network of dealers immediately lead to another gang filling the breach but also led, he found, to increased violence. 

This resulted from resulting turf wars and to the more incipient need not to be 'snitched' on when arrested. If names had to be provided to mitigate the sentence later incurred, those with a less violent reputation would be the ones to choose to avoid violent repercussions. Dealers knew the more violent they were, the safer they became. See: http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2019/10/drugs-biggest-goldrush-in-world-and-its.html


Drug related crime

Much of the recent spike in youth murders is gang and drug related, as is the wave of shop lifting and theft necessary to support life in absence of regular income and to sustain a costly drug habit. Women are either forced into prostitution to pay for the habit or are intentionally turned into addicts by their pimps. London and other big cities provide the model for the rest of the country as the pernicious trade extends. Unemployment, homelessness, educational failure, family breakdown, child abuse, urban and industrial decay all provide fertile ground for addiction.

Solutions?

So what is 'Government', to do about this issue that causes untold harm to the individual and society? 

First it needs to admit its penal approach to drug-taking is misguided and totally ineffective. In truth it knows this to be the case but is politically terrified of taking a different approach. Although widespread, drug taking is widely regarded with disdain as are those who engage in it. They have little influence on decision makers. If anyone is to be targeted it needs to be those at the top of the pyramid not those at the bottom, although for the reasons already stated, it is doubtful this will set back the trade for long.

The government therefore needs to update its understanding to drugs in general and dispense with the outdated and unhelpful classification of socially acceptable and unacceptable. Let's just accept that all drugs have both benefits and dangers and treat them all with uniform circumspection and control. It must be absurd to criminalise Cannabis, particularly when it has proven medicinal applications, just because of historic irrational fears and baggage. The criminalisation and incarceration of a generation of users, is nothing short of criminal itself.

The British Parliament has consistently refused to initiate a comprehensive review of drug legislation and activity. With so many dying and being adversely affected this unforgivable. Is the explanation political cowardice, negligence or something more sinister? After all who really does benefit from the this multi-billion pound industry? And who benefits from not treating it rationally?

Addiction to chemical substances, be it nicotine or alcohol, prescription drugs or currently illegal drugs, is a medical and social issue not a criminal one. Maybe we need to question why supplying the latter ones incurs fines and imprisonment, whilst the former results in Knighthoods and large pay-packets?

Why should society not benefit in tax, from the production and sale of cannabis as it does from tobacco? Why should the dangers of drugs of all kinds be properly communicated with the necessary support and advice services. Would it not be preferable to spend on these what we currently expend on police and lawyers?

Perhaps what is needed is a government department devoted solely to drugs in all their forms, the addictions and problems that go with them. In the meantime political class and government needs to appoint a committee of enquiry with broad terms of reference without further delay and GET A GRIP on what is a majot threat to individuals and society alike!

Drugs and the violent consequences from  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-england-london-49632394

Posted at 13:2313:23

Four defendants 'acted together to carry out serious harm'

Thomas Mackintosh

BBC London News

Mr Aylett describes the drug-dealing world as "one of turf-wars, rivalries and pathetic claims for ‘respect’.

He adds: "When drug-dealers fall out, they do not take their problems to the police. Instead, they take matters into their own hands, prepared to use serious violence in order to prove whatever point it is that they wish to make.

"The prosecution allege that all four defendants had gone together in Petrovic’s car to Harold Hill in order to mete out violence – and not, as Petrovic has claimed, to collect money and drugs.

Mr Aylett says it is the prosecutions case that the four males "acted together as part of a joint plan to cause at least really serious bodily harm to someone in that park, even if Jodie Chesney was not necessarily their intended target."

"If the prosecution are right in saying that Jodie Chesney was an entirely blameless individual who got caught up in some quarrel between drug dealers, then her murder was the terrible but predictable consequence of an all-too casual approach to the carrying – and using – of knives."

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/uk-ticket-holder-is-countrys-biggest-ever-lottery-winner-after-scooping-170-m-euro-millions-jackpot-064615281.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYW9sLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvMjAxOS8xMC8wOS9ib3Jpcy1qb2huc29uLXBsYW5uaW5nLXRvLXRlbGwtcXVlZW4tc2hlLWNhbi10LXNhY2staGltLWlmLWhlLz9uY2lkPXdlYm1haWw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAACphZd00ZrEpYxGjkc9_kHslb_4P5Y3Lybe3UAFVTFQEbdL3W1yiMhu05raO4gZp6PUrzyOTL2t96mWJc6Xlusumxrtx6AZMiu0FsewJeN26UXH0oqHjUH8nelkbe2N6bWtlSYG9P3rzi5dU9gYKTN5KA7wtRAf1eeSfgUVUPGjX

Britain's biggest ever drug smuggling gang has been smashed after billions of pounds worth of narcotics was brought into the UK, the National Crime Agency has said.

Officers arrested 13 men aged between 24 and 59 on Tuesday across the country in dawn raids.

The NCA seized 351 kilos of cocaine, 92 kilos of heroin, 250 kilos of cannabis and 1,850 kilos of hemp/hashish, with a total street value of more than £38 million, in three consignments in September 2018.

"Drugs the biggest goldrush in the world and it's the drug laws that create it." Undercover Cop Infiltrates Murderous Gangs: Neil Woods | True Crime Podc...

"Everything in Russia is run by Jews". Rabbi Reveals Shocking History of Putin, KGB, Chabad, & Mossad