Monday, 23 January 2017


Internal Bataclan Photo disseminated from Jerusalem!


  • Yet another indication that Paris Friday 13th attacks were a joint Mossad/? Operation.
  • French Journalist whose research revealsthe fact is arrested confirming French complicity.
  • "Let justice be done though the heavens fall."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3319244/Video-reveals-horrific-moment-terrorists-opened-fire-crowd-music-fans-Bataclan-killing-89-people-shows-musician-hiding-drums-escape.html


Reposted from: http://www.awdnews.com/society/french-journalist-arrested-after-exposing-israeli-link-to-paris-attacks

Investigative journalist Hicham Hamza was detained by French police last month after exposing Israel’s role in orchestrating the Paris Attacks on November 13, 2015. 
 
Police charged Hamza with “violating judicial secrecy,” and have threatened him with potential prison time for a photo Hamza published online.
Below is a translation of Hicham Hamza’s article describing his arrest:
Detained by police for investigating the attacks in Paris
An independent journalist and founder of the investigative website Panamza, I was detained for seven hours by police about an article in which I revealed the Israeli origin of the shocking photo of the Bataclan.
On Monday, February 22nd, I went of my own accord to the police station in response to a summons from the Crimes Against Persons Brigade, located in the 13th arrondissement of Paris.
The day before, I had received an “urgent” voice message from an official of the Directorate of the Judicial Police asking me to call him immediately. The reason: my  December 15th article entitled “Bataclan Carnage: The shocking photo was disseminated from Jerusalem.”
I was familiar with the Judicial Police premises, having been summoned twice to respond to “defamation” complaints brought against me by Caroline Fourest and Pierre Bergé.
Surprise! This time, upon arrival I was “placed in custody” following a preliminary investigation by the Paris prosecutor. The officer informed me that I was now suspected of having committed – by publishing my article – the following offenses: “violation of the secrecy of an investigation”, “publication of an image that seriously undermines human dignity,” and “premeditated voluntary violence without ITT.”*
Yes, you read that correctly.
So what happened next?
I was led to cell to await the arrival of my lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre so that she could be present, as the law allows, during my interrogation.
After the interrogation, I was made to read and sign the minutes of my statements. I was then returned to detention pending the police response. Five hours later I left the musty old double-locked room to learn that no decision had been taken by the prosecutor of the Republic.
I was finally allowed to collect my things and go.
The merits of the case?
While following the torturous trail of the shocking, anonymous Bataclan massacre photo, I had done my work as an investigative journalist. My objective was to fully document my sources. So in my article, I inserted the URL of the first web page containing the non-blurred Bataclan picture (which I had chosen to truncate on my site).
The original source of the photo turned out, oddly enough, to be a tweet published by an Israeli organization headed by the U.S. neoconservative Mark Gerson.
My practice – which is increasingly costly and risky – of ultra-sourced web journalism is my guarantee of reliability for my readers: I give them my sources to check so they can judge for themselves the veracity of my information.
Today, the Paris prosecutor – who reports directly to the Ministry of Justice – claimed that I had supposedly “violated the secrecy of the investigation” and committed “premeditated voluntary violence” by “disseminating” the photo necessarily included in this tweet.
Duly noted.
I had already said in my hearing that I contested with the greatest force the validity of such accusations.
The Paris prosecutor’s office, directed by François Molins, now has six months to decide whether to indict me.
In the crosshairs
Keep in mind that on December 1st, the Valls government had announced – via its inter-ministerial delegate Gilles Clavreul – its hostility against me, confessing awkwardly that it would seek “legal loopholes to get (Hamza) prosecuted.”
Meanwhile, the arrival of Jean-Jacques Urvoas to head the Department of Justice was accompanied, more discreetly, by another little-noticed change. Thomas Andrieu, the director of the Civil Liberties and Legal Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of Interior (and former right arm of Manuel Valls) became on February 5th the chief of staff of the new Minister of Justice.
On December 2nd I had published an article about this close associate of the pro-Israel network. The chief architect of the state of emergency, Thomas Andrieu had been previously charged with carrying out the government’s promise (which was in the end never kept) of dissolving the Jewish Defense League. (Editor’s note: Responsible for dozens if not hundreds of terrorist attacks, and untold thousands of threats of violence, the JDL has been officially declared a terrorist organization by the FBI; yet due to the power of the Zionist lobby it remains legal in France, Canada, and other countries.)
A detail that speaks volumes: In my article “Bataclan Carnage: The shocking photo was disseminated from Jerusalem,” I also raised questions about the JDL, stressing that this Zionist and racist militia, which is tolerated in France (but considered a terrorist group the United States and Israel) had directly published the gruesome Bataclan photograph on the homepage of its website.
We still do not know all the details about provenance and chain of custody of the photograph in question, which was designed to elicit terror, and whose authenticity is has been much discussed in the foreign alternative media. What we do know is that it first appeared on the website of a webmaster based in Jerusalem.
But it should come as no surprise that the Jewish Defense League – a small group linked to similar networks of the Israeli extreme right – could publish the photo without attracting the wrath of Bernard Cazeneuve, the Minister of the Interior who is extremely obliging to the Zionist movement and its operational relay in France: the MOSSAD.
Surprise, surprise: Along with the explicit title “Bataclan photo of the victims,” the shocking picture, whose publication by the JDL was exposed a month later on Panamza, has since been replaced by an off-topic illustration showing  … the seats in the house.
Someone in high places must have protected the JDL from any police summons by quietly asking them to remove the photograph.
As for me: For revealing the Israeli source of the image, which was manipulated through social media to instil fear and acceptance of draconian security measures, I was detained by police, at the request of prosecutors, for seven hours.
Now I am under threat of new prosecutions likely to bring, this time, a prison sentence.

See also: 
http://veaterecosan.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=paris



 Add comment 
Melbourne: to tell or not?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE2sCmFPpXk


Very strangely in the following video clip, a man in dark glasses (always a secret service indicator) appears briefly to whisper in the ear of Pauline Hanson, that a "terrorist attack" had occurred in Melbourne. Strange because this was denied by Government/Police sources at the time. Another example of a scheme not going quite according to plan?

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eGRwUv0D68

Now a question: Is the woman produced as an "eye witness" at 1.20 mins. here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCkqE5f_TFE the same one who is filmed screaming on the ground at 2.30 mins. here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE2sCmFPpXk. If not they are remarkably similar and I for one cannot tell them apart. Of course if they are the same person, not only it is strongly suggestive of a "crisis actor" at play, but her credibility as a witness would be trashed, as would the credibility of the whole event.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BE2sCmFPpXk/maxresdefault.jpg

See video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE2sCmFPpXk


http://newobserveronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Melbourne-car-rammerMAIN.jpg



In the following video, taken it appears by a "13 Cabs" taxi driver parked adjacent to the route of the offending car, the scene depicted is of four prostrate victims before the emergency services arrive. Significantly, although a deserted push chair is shown, there is no evidence of a small child, a ten year old girl, or a twenty two year old woman. The only explanation must be these victims were injured elsewhere. Some might find the number of the cab - 9393 - interesting, as here we have the makings of three sixes and two threes.  The Chief Operating Officer of  '13 Cabs', is ex army officer, Stuart Overall,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE2sCmFPpXk

"13 Cabs", Head Office, Oakleigh, 35 Downing Street, Melbourne. 

Stuart Overell

Chief Operating Officer (Taxi Services) at Cabcharge Australia Limited





Army Officer

Australian Army
 –  (8 years)
Posted to Officer Training, Infantry and Artillery units during my Military career.
Cab Number - "M 9393" at 7.25 mins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE2sCmFPpXk  
Who was the person who did the filming? Wikipedia has this on '13 Cabs': "In June 2012 13CABS came under public scrutiny for releasing what was dubbed as a scare campaign targeting young women.[6] The campaign was a response to the Taxi Industry Inquiry recommendation that unmarked mini-cabs, similar to those in London, be released in Melbourne.The campaign was stopped due to public feedback, including a petition against it."

There is a rather questionable incident at 5.30 mins on this video where an apparent female victim starts screaming wildly only when she notices the camera man, and seems to stop when he leaves? Nor does she show any obvious sign of injury. Of course both these observations could have genuine cause but it might also indicate unreliability. The camera man also seems intent on focusing on the ground and not revealing any faces or the horizontal plane as might be expected.


"Damned if you do. Damned if you don't." 

In legal jurisdictions based on English Common Law, individuals are apparently under the legal obligation to report felonies (or their renamed descendants) and subject to criminal sanctions if they do not; yet at the same time are prevented by doing so by the strictures of the Official Secrets Act, or whatever approximates to it. 

We are all aware of which of these two, power brokers are more concerned to enforce, with such as Snowden, Manning and Assange - the most notable of many more - as living proof.

Those that seek to fulfil their duties under 'misprision' generally do not fare well (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_whistleblowers)  

(As an aside, "misprison" features in one of my favourite Shakespeare sonnets, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonnet_87) 

We may conclude that government is frequently responsible for illegal activity and persecutes anyone with the audacity to reveal it, even when legally obliged to do so. 


What caused the damage to the roof of the car in addition to the front?

http://e3.365dm.com/17/01/536x302/12d71a2d5093e54b40f5add89ea34d3494fc3888e2dce3e8c33a8a59212c969a_3873845.jpg?20170120074137



Yet the public is generally under a spell, refusing to doubt anything emanating from official sources, or believing that Government itself could institute criminal acts itself to achieve perverse (or even laudable!) objectives. Perhaps slowly the spell is being broken to the advantage of us all.

Matthew Si, 33, was killed in a car rampage through the Melbourne CBD on Friday.Source:Supplied
Matthew Si, 33, was killed in a car rampage through the Melbourne CBD on Friday.


The Melbourne Incident

As to the most recent Melbourne - Melbourne note yet again - incident, it certainly has a strong whiff of fish about it, not least that to a certain extent it mimics the tactics employed at Nice and Berlin, both highly suspect with extraordinary Jewish/Israeli connections. Sadly even in this event, a young Jewish girl was one of the victims, not specifically targeted yet unfortunate enough to be killed. Does anyone remember the notorious case of the Israeli spy Ben Zygier who came from Melbourne and died in mysterious circumstances in a Tel Aviv gaol?

Ten-year-old Thalia Hakin (12) was one of the victims of the Bourke St massacre.Source:Supplied
Ten-year-old Thalia Hakin was one of the victims of the Bourke St massacre.

"Thalia Hakin, whose scout troupe were also there to pay respects, should have been returning to Beth Rivkah Ladies College in a few weeks, the MPs said. “I think all Victorians can identify ... with a girl who was going into grade five, her life all in front of her, robbed by some crazed person,” Mr Danby said." (Source: http://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/bourke-st-rampage-accused-released-from-hospital/news-story/2d057a50d89fcf458b8a4734a7d765a1)

Youth, beauty and innocence appear to be the dominant subliminal message from the images published.


Jessica Mudie aka Jess Davis (22) died as a result of being run down by accused Dimitrious “Jimmy” Gargasoulas who allegedly went on a rampage in his car at Bourke Street Mall in Melbourne, killing five people. Picture: InstagramSource:Instagram
Jessica Mudie aka Jess Davis died as a result of being run down by accused Dimitrious “Jimmy” Gargasoulas who allegedly went on a rampage in his car at Bourke Street Mall in Melbourne, killing five people. Picture: Instagram


Given that five fatalities have been reported including a five month old child, two individuals await to be named for some reason it seems.

Suspicious Features?

I have not studied Melbourne as closely as I have others, so am reticent to make firm judgements, but the fact that the driver was able to insinuate himself into the background of a live news transmission is itself suspicious, as is the flamboyant way in which he was caught on camera doing 'wheelies' and shouting slogans apparently in support of Muslim terrorism. These have  invariably featured in reports of events in America and Europe, whether accurate or not. 

The treatment and portrayal of the event and its timing are other indicative features of planned deception at some level or other. For example, an official TV reporter (Stephanie Anderson) attending a Mayoral Press Conference was immediately on scene and able to describe the unfolding events to TV viewers.

This event took place on 20 January 2017, around 1:30 pm local time.  On the same date Donald J. Trump was inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States at 5 pm on January 20, 2017. That is almost precisely twenty hours later. It also occurred bang in the middle of the Australian Open Tennis Championships scheduled on16 - 29 Jan 2017in... Melbourne of course. 

Three possibilities present themselves as to timing: it was co-incidental; the assailant chose the time for maximum impact; or someone else behind the event chose it for maximum impact, and particularly with Trump's inauguration in mind.


Dimitrious ‘Jimmy’ Gargasoulas. Picture: AAP Image/SuppliedSource:AAP
Dimitrious ‘Jimmy’ Gargasoulas. Picture: AAP Image/Supplied


And the name of the attacker: Dimitrious Gargasoulas. "Soulless" for goodness sake? Maybe just a coincidence but if you are not convinced just check out the names of other alleged terrorists, a feature I and others have drawn attention to elsewhere. Rather conveniently an image of him conveys all we need to know, or think we know, about such a brazen and ruthless individual. Interestingly it is set against a black and white tiled background that may have significance to some.

In this image, why is the alleged perpatrator left uncovered?

https://s.yimg.com/dh/ap/default/170119/burkest2ART.jpg


The Hero Figure

There is always a "hero figure" that seems to appear in such incidents. Is this may just be a reflection of human need or journalistic practice but we cannot exclude manipulation. In this case it was reported as follows: 

"Stuffed toys and flowers adorned the stage at the square, with law student Henry Dow telling the crowd how a taxi driver named Lou jumped into action alongside him after the attack. "I am Lou, you are going to be okay," was how the cabbie reassured the female victim, Mr Dow said.""We are looking after you." The pair commenced CPR on the woman, with Lou taking command. He was a "genuine hero", Mr Dow said." (Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-23/accused-bourke-st-killer-charged-with-five-counts-of-murder/8204148)

Yet again a crucial individual goes by only his Christian name.

Now we are told the suspect 'refuses' to appear in court to face the charges! "He was en route to Melbourne’s Magistrates Court on Monday afternoon after being questioned be police.But Nine News reported his lawyer requested the accused be excused from appearing in court due to health concerns. The Herald Sun reports Dimitrious Gargasoulas isn’t expected to return to court until August. Even then he will only appear via video link and will not step inside a courtroom until next year." (Source: http://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/bourke-st-rampage-accused-released-from-hospital/news-story/2d057a50d89fcf458b8a4734a7d765a1) 

Yet again an alleged assailant is either "neutralised" on the spot, or disappears into some official hibernation, "whilst the case is prepared against him." 

Even this exceptionalism acts as a red flag that this event is not all it makes out to be.

The familiar emotional treatment by the media:


https://i2.wp.com/www.theage.com.au/content/dam/images/g/t/w/f/u/u/image.related.articleLeadwide.620x349.gtwikm.png/1485114592849.jpg?resize=620%2C349


http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/8200644-3x2-700x467.jpg


https://joinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/130-300x160.jpg


https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/c759ddea2f1b1b772ae44eafa2bd540295917004/0_395_5058_3037/master/5058.jpg?w=460&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=93ac32df7d2ba9612c6ca4d68937b690


http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/8205668-3x2-700x467.jpg

Thursday, 19 January 2017

Obama to Trump: "The King is dead; Long live the King"?



http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03541/Barack-Obama-gets-_3541878k.jpg
http://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/msnbc/components/video/201607/a_ov_rnc_trump_mashup_160722__872382.nbcnews-ux-1080-600.jpg


As regards Obama, it's important to distinguish between image and reality. 

This man may have have a very persuasive manner and plausible appearance - even undoubted charisma - but so have many Hollywood actors. It may be indicative of true character but it cannot be relied upon. There are many indicators that in personal as well as political life, all may not be quite as it seems or as is portrayed.

In relation to only the latter, it should be remembered despite his warm words, he approved of non-judicial drone assassination, that also killed thousands of innocents; covertly worked to create ISIS as a terrorist organisation; failed to properly investigate 9/11 or hold anyone to account for 'extraordinary rendition' or torture; failed in eight years to empty Guantanamo prison filled with un-convicted individuals in terrible conditions; bombed, invaded or incited unrest in more Muslim countries than any other President; approved two major Israelis attacks on Gaza in 2008 and 2014, that killed thousands more; yet still approved a 38 billion dollar package to continue its policy of intimidation and apartheid; approved the secret Stuxnet attack on Iran that back-fired catastrophically when it went 'rogue'; has ramped up tension with Russia and China; and allowed a web of occult child abuse to infect the Democratic Party.  Meanwhile on virtually every indicator of the domestic economy as regards wealth and debt, things are worse now than when he took office.

Not a bad record for eight years I would say.

Abraham Lincoln watches in approval as the president and a young girl hug in the Oval Office.
Lawrence Jackson/White House Photo


Many believe, that despite his socialist (communist even!) activist background, his meteoric rise to power from Detroit, notorious for its corrupt Mafia network, he was chosen as the acceptable face of the right, in similar vein perhaps to our own much missed and lamented Blair. The American political system must maintain the myth of democracy or it is finished, and for this the parties must be allowed to take it in turns, as long as the true power does not. I think Obama was aware of this from the beginning and agreed to run on those terms. 

All Presidents, in one way or another, are made to realise they are not really in control but merely the manikin placed in the window. There are exceptions to the rule, but these are either because the President is either part of the manipulative so called "Deep State", or outside it. The latter have a tendency to end badly. The truth may have dawned on President Bush when he was in Aircraft One without fighter protection and totally incommunicado for hours after 9/11 despite ostensibly being "Commander-in-Chief". It dawned on President Kennedy when he was set up by the Bay of Pigs fiasco and later by the Cuba Crisis, which his earlier experience helped to avert. Of course the final realisation must have come with the intense pain of the first bullet.


Meanwhile Trump is a bit of an "known, unknown" quantity - to borrow a phrase from a well known conspirator. Trump may be better, he may be worse - we've yet to see. "Making America great again" could go either way but at least for the time being, he's put a spanner in 'military/industrial/banking/media complex' drive to war (hopefully) He is from a different cultural hinterland to JFK other than being sons of wealthy and ambitious fathers. Kennedy was a Catholic but neither that (or his marriage) was allowed to interfere with his prodigious sexual appetite. Trump does not appear to claim any particular religious beliefs, and thereby at least avoids the trap of hypocrisy with his. At least both appear to be or have been "straight" but in these enlightened days, this is becoming less of a barrier to political high office. It would seem that only criminal, deviant or under-age sexual activity now retains any real power to damage reputation.

Trump is undoubtedly an egotist and a populist, both of which in politics are dangerous attributes. He also appears to be racist and xenophobic which goes back a long way. Of course he denies this. Years ago he was subject to a Justice Department investigation because he refused to let his flats to coloured people. His stated attitude to Mexicans, Muslims and 'immigrants' in general, seem to confirm his basic prejudices and world view haven't evolved much over time. Rather like Nigel Farage in Britain, who he actively extolled, and Marine Le Pen in France (not to mention much more notorious figures from the not too distant past!) he quickly discovered that prejudice and fear are powerful drivers. 

He has made a lot of money and avoided paying tax which he regards as being proof he is "smarter". Whether he will hold to this view when getting tax off of others, awaits to be seen. His main attribute, and probably why he was elected, is because he is an outsider and not a part of the Washington "swamp", so called. (One of his promises of course was to 'drain' it!) However, particularly as we country folk know, swamp has a habit of sucking you in, until after a while you become indistinguishable. Will this happen? In particular will his aim to be mates with Putin, withstand a deeply entrenched policy direction by those that have lived off and in, the swamp for too long?

Hopefully the word is getting out and awareness will dawn as to dark intentions, before it's too late. Some of us have seen for a long time how "terrorism" in large part has been orchestrated to pursue both a domestic and international agenda. Clinton was central to that: she was protected on a quid quo pro basis.

Trump was chosen in preference to Sanders because he was seen as less electable. He was Clinton's stalking horse. There is little doubt that the Wikileaks revelations was but another nail in her coffin, and blaming Russia, already cast irrationally and unethically as a major threat, was but a last minute desperate attempt to deflect from the sordid state of affairs in the Democratic hierarchy. It didn't work because the evidence was not there.

Even more desperately the same tactic was tried with Trump. Incredibly it now appears that the British ex-MI6 intelligence man that provided the incriminatory information about alleged sordid goings on in Russian hotel bedrooms, was also the handler for the turned Russian spy Litvinenko, who was fatally poisoned by someone (the British claim it was the Russians on Putin's orders) with radioactive Polonium. They do say that MI6 Officers never retire, so it also raises the spectre, as some have claimed, that MI6 was actively in league with the CIA to frustrate Trump's route to the White House. Who knows? Presumably somebody.


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YcGPSnswzjc/maxresdefault.jpg


In all cases, if true, it is likely to back-fire spectacularly. The reputations of both CIA and the FBI have been damaged, and it is likely that heads will roll. The only remaining question is which ones? We should not forget that although Kennedy sacked Dulles, it did not stop the latter being appointed to the Warren Commission, widely seen as a white wash of the real assassins. Trump would do well to brush up his recent history (as well as his Shakespeare!) if he wants to survive at least one full term.

I thought the story about Johnson at the beginning of the Kennedy adminisration was telling. It is well known that Johnson hated the Kennedys with a vengeance - calling them the "Irish Mafia"- and desperately wanted the Presidency himself. With JFK riding high in the popularity polls and four years to run (at least) he was despondent. This changed dramatically after a meeting early on, the sub-text being that he knew from the start and was probably instrumental in, the planned assassination. http://jfktruth.org/johnson/index.htm

Contrary to the public civilized image, American politics is steeped in blood and the candidates, of all people, know this is true. Further, that the real threat comes NOT from foreign or outside forces, as is always suggested, but from INSIDE the political camp itself, as much with 9/11 as with Kennedy. Trump must know this. If internal forces could dispose of at least three of the Kennedy clan by violent means, because they posed a threat to particularly the intelligence and military sectors, there is no reason to suppose anything has changed, if Trump attempts to do the same.

Occupation of the office of President, does not of itself, ensure security or preservation, despite the millions expended on it. What does, is acting as stooge and facilitator of a powerful network, held together by common financial, social and cultural interests. Being an outsider, Trump is already vulnerable and as a commercial pragmatist, is likely to adopt whatever course satisfies that lobby, just so long as he can show some economic achievements, for which he can claim credit. The first six weeks of his Presidency will not only reveal the direction of travel, and whether the rhetoric of the hustings can be relied upon, but also in large measure, the longevity of Trump himself.

Tuesday, 17 January 2017

Hampstead Children: IPCC Supports Complaints against Met. Police.

The full response to several complaints made by the children's mother, Ella Gareva, regarding the way the Metropolitan Police handled her children's revelations and allegations is here:

https://www.scribd.com/document/336623224/5555


I have just read through it in detail now. It is good that in about half of of the raised grounds for appeal, IPCC has found in favour of mother and children and as a result has recommended a second investigation by a different and un-involved police officer. The first was carried out by DI Foulkes, who was in fact directly involved with the original deeply flawed procedure. There is the long-standing legal dictum of "Nemo judex in causa sua" meaning literally, "no-one should be a judge in his own cause." Subtly the police find ways of circumventing it. How is it possible in such a notorious case the Metropolitan Police Commisioner or for that matter the Home Secretary could allow an officer so intimately involved with the initial investigation decide whether it was done correctly or not? Yet again camaraderie and self interest trump objective assessment. So there is a very real question mark over whether the second will be any better or make any practical difference to anything. Given the fact that on no less than ELEVEN grounds, besides a number of others where there is insufficient information for a firm view, the IPCC supports the applicant, it throws in sharp relief the refusal to allow a route of appeal against Judge Pauffley's original ignominious reasoning. Whatever happens, and particularly in the light of 'Pizzagate' and the mounting international evidence of occult practices around child abuse, that fully support the children's claims, this case will go down as an everlasting stain on the Metropolitan Police's handling of it, both at the time and subsequently.

Monday, 16 January 2017

Of Spies and Fake News
Donald Trump channels Burt Reynolds - the quintessential the Cosmopolitan centerfold - as he relaxes in his robehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3913524/The-extraordinary-intimate-Trump-family-photos-THRIFT-SHOP-showing-Donald-s-softer-side.html

The topics of spies and fake stories have been much in the news of late. They have of course been centred on the process to elect a new American President and Donald Trump in particular. 
It is clear that his election to what is described as "the most powerful position in world", has upset a lot of well-made plans of mice and men. Other aphorisms come to mind: 'A bull in a china shop' and 'fox amongst the chickens' seem particularly appropriate to me - on many levels!
A very brief, and therefore admittedly superficial, summary may be in order to try to get a grip on the essentials. It has been said that politics and prostitution are very alike, except that the former is much dirtier. These events appear to prove it true.
http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-it-has-been-said-that-politics-is-the-second-oldest-profession-i-have-learned-that-it-bears-a-ronald-reagan-151758.jpg

Across the Western World, Government has lost its shine. Indeed for one reason or another, politicians and the machinery of government itself, is in crisis. Wherever one looks, government and its political leaders have reached a nadir of public confidence and approval. Merkel in Germany, Hollande in France, May in Britain, Obama and Trump in America, to mention but a few. Scepticism and distrust appear to have reached epidemic and endemic proportions throughout the world.
Why this should be, is put down to various causes, one of them being the 'alternative media' and rise of the Internet. Certainly 'news' and opinion is now much more difficult to control, and particularly that which reflects badly on those in positions of power.
 http://hoocher.com/Oliver_Cromwell/Oliver_Cromwell_Two.jpg
No wonder there is now so much emphasis placed by them on "Fake News" and the need to control it. Many would see it merely as a thinly veiled attempt to curtail freely expressed opinion and the very opposite of fake news - the truth. Few politicians subscribe to Oliver Cromwell's instruction to "paint me, worts and all" it seems.
There is little doubt that this has had a corrosive effect on the respect and deference in which they are held but it is a process that has a much longer ontology dating back to the satire shows and publications of the 1960's, although the genre is much older still - Punch and the cartoonists of the eighteenth century are British examples.

BMS.6546 (etching) Thomas Rowlandson, Political Affection. London: John Hanyer, 22 April 1784.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOWm09DnMyfngnFcX9Ud5mU2dJfBSxG2ae2s8qNad9chhcy3Q3RDiDujNQlq5TWAFQAk0Jjz7o8fU_AX0lm9FiXlrB7hzkuPb2YymC689jnXbcMHY_kULpQepNdcZMzTXy2w6nH9Wro34/s1600/6546.jpg

"All is fair in love and war" and currently America is at war with itself. Nor is love completely out of the question. Trump rode to victory on being anti-establishment and "draining the Washington swamp". It is therefore hardly surprising that the dirty tricks and opposition have emanated from both Democratic and Republican circles. There are suggestions that State organs such as the CIA and FBI might also be implicated in trying to undermine his position.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/D8YdSvyp89E/hqdefault.jpg

Central to the current debacle was the story of lewd goings on in Moscow hotels. Note how it played to other promoted themes such as the threat from Russia and his affinity with President Putin. It comes only weeks after highly damaging revelations flowing from Wikileaks publication of hundreds of thousands of private E-mails that implicated Hillary Clinton's Chief of Staff, John Podesta was linked into a child abuse network behind a front of Pizza businesses. 

https://i1.wp.com/www.newnationalist.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/pizzagate-compilation.jpg?resize=600%2C350

This and further evidence of the misuse of a private server for official secret communication, suspicious deaths linked to the Clintons, corrupt payments and laundering through the Clinton Foundation and other disreputable actions, all conspired to interfere with the Clinton supremacy that had been projected and supported by the media machine.
Whatever one might think of Trump, it cannot be denied he won despite all the odds. We may not like all his opinions and rhetoric but we can not help but like the fact that there is a glimmer of hope that international tensions might possibly be reduced by his election and that his unconventional approach may possibly disrupt what has emerged as a malign and dangerous cabal intent on war.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2017/01/12/Steele-Trump-large_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqSFXWNnhoSSUDZbpG8a9LxFe3EUkzYjpuremyrIsmq5I.jpg

It appears that central to what was intended as salacious and highly damaging information on Trump's sexual behaviour in Moscow originated with an ex- British MI6 officer, Chris Steele (52) who had been a Second Secretary at the British Embassy there as part of his twenty years employment and subsequently on leaving in 1999 had started his own (with another ex-British spy Christopher Burrows) his own lucrative private investigation businesses. These were "Orbis Business Intelligence" and "Walsingham Training" located respectively nearby Buckingham Palace and in Eastleigh, Hampshire the Times reports. (See foot notes)
Steele had followed a very traditional spy route from Cambridge - he was president of the debating society - and into the Foreign Office. He therefore presumably has some very useful contacts in high places.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwf34c6SMyuFBjo6wVzWXE0CGizEw7O-zIDbBTkHczSN-_4cTpIHMesVyngva3s4gvFyud66iATES9bm3WXj5PmmX62JJMd7-6_eMJjL5BQApz26tzrkeCwtILjinQkwNtMZptpIvfE3yY/s1600/francis-walsingham.jpg

When Chris Steele's name and identity entered the public domain (and that in itself raises a question) he precipitously with his second wife and children from his previous marriage (his first wife died in 2009 following a brief illness) set off from his Surrey home, reputedly because he was fearful for his health and safety.
Now when someone as deeply embedded in covert activities runs for cover from what he sees as real risk, you had better take it seriously. It begs the question from what direction it might come? The FSB is one obvious source but previous experience would suggest it tends to target Russian emigres it perceives as traitors. Would it go for an Englishman living in England who arguably has only damaged the reputation of an American?

Alexander Litvinenko
http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/169CA/production/_84581629_84581628.jpg

If as is suggested he wrote the report at the request of first disaffected Republicans and later Democrats, to damage Trumps chances in respectively the Primaries and then General Election, why might a threat come from that quarter? Would it be to prevent further details emerging as to who (the CIA or Military?) that was behind it?
Or might it even be that he saw a threat coming from British based organisations for reasons of treachery or because it might embarrass HM Government? Steele would still be subject to the Official Secrets Act. If the information (or unsubstantiated rumours) he passed on were gained whilst employed by MI6, or arguably because of it, he may have committed a criminal offence. 
The last thing MI6 would want would be a public trial for that. The cases of Stephen Milligan, Lady Diana, Gareth Williams and David Kelly are all too fresh in the memory to rule out the potential for assassination from a domestic quarter.

DR. DAVID KELLY: "MANY DARK ACTORS"
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*vQPmm_XLoqpjhg_scvM7uA.jpeg

How strange it is, that whenever this sort of story breaks, Jewish individuals, organisations or the Israeli State appears to get in on the act. The Israel-based newspaper Haaritz (see below) makes the claim that reservations have been made as to the intelligence implications of a Trump Presidency. Apparently it has warned that if Trump and Putin get on, this might mean it is unable to share secret information with the CIA as it might get back to its enemy, Iran.
Clearly Israel wanted Clinton in the White House and is trying to undermine Trumps position, no doubt in consort with its political and departmental lackeys in Washington. The people that actually paid for the Steele disinformation has not be revealed but it might be interesting to know. Is it feasible that Israel was behind this whole thing? In view of the recent disclosures by Aljazeera of such specific proposals to get rid of British politician Alan Duncan and others - with incidentally little in the way of consequences - it is far from impossible. Both in assassination and dirty tricks, Israel has proved itself more than competent.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/nintchdbpict000292902961.jpg?strip=all&w=960

Now before we leave the subject altogether, sadly and co-incidentally, a day after Mr Steele went into hiding from the press, a notable critic of it - particularly in Germany - died. Udo Ulfkotte who was fifty-seven succumbed to a heart attack on Friday 13th January, 2017. He had, it is said, survived earlier such health scares. He appears to have been critical of Merkel's policy of allowing Muslim refugees to enter the country in such numbers, although having in the past converted to Islam but later returning to Christianity. He memorably claimed that all German journalism was in hock to the USA and the CIA. (See Foot Notes below)

FOOT NOTES
From: https://orbisbi.com/about-orbis/
Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd. was founded in 2009 by former British intelligence professionals. The team now draws on extensive experience at boardroom level in government, multilateral diplomacy and international business to develop bespoke solutions for clients.
Our tailored approach means the Directors are closely involved in the execution and detail of every project, supported by an in–house team of experienced investigators and professional intelligence analysts.
Our global network of senior associates is made up of regional, industry and academic experts, as well as prominent business figures. We call upon their expertise and closed network of contacts to help our clients frame business decisions, protect our clients’ reputations, and problem–solve for companies facing complex issues worldwide.
Ethical business practice is a fundamental value for the Orbis Business Intelligence team. Our documented procedures, developed in conjunction with external legal counsel, ensure compliance with relevant UK, US and EU legislation.



From:

http://www.bizdb.co.uk/company/walsingham-training-limited-09558344/

General Information

 Name:
Walsingham Training Ltd
 Office Address:
Highland House Mayflower Close Chandler's Ford SO53 4AR Eastleigh
 Number: 09558344
 Incorporation date: 2015-04-23
 End of financial year: 31 March
 Category: Private Limited Company
 Status: Active
This company named Walsingham Training has been founded on 2015/04/23 as a PLC. This company registered office could be gotten hold of Eastleigh on Highland House Mayflower Close, Chandler's Ford. When you have to reach the firm by mail, its postal code is SO53 4AR. The reg. no. for Walsingham Training Limited is 09558344. This company principal business activity number is 70229 and has the NACE code: Management consultancy activities other than financial management. 2016-03-31 is the last time account status updates were reported. Right from the moment it was started 2 years ago, it has been a reference point for others in this line of business, achieving great success.
From the data we have, the company was founded two years ago and has been governed by two directors.


On January 13, Udo Ulfkotte died, reportedly of a heart attack.
Ulfkotte had been an editor at the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitzung.
He published a courageous book in which he said that the CIA had a hand on every significant journalist in Europe, which gave Washington control over European opinion and reduced knowledge of and opposition to Washington’s control over European heads of state. Essentially, there are no European governments independent of Washington.
From WIKI: According to Ulfkotte, the CIA and German intelligence (BND) bribe journalists in Germany to write pro-NATO propaganda articles, and it is well understood that one may lose their media job if they fail to comply with the pro-Western agenda.[8][9][10] In 2014, Ulfkotte published Bought Journalists ("Gekaufte Journalisten"), in which he claims that the CIA and other secret services pay money to journalists to report a particular story in a certain light.[11][12]
  • Bought Journalists. How Politicians, Intelligence and High Finance Control German's Mass Media. Kopp, Rottenburg am Neckar 2014, ISBN 978-3-8644-5143-0
  • Holy War in Europe. Eichborn, Frankfurt/Main, 2007, ISBN 3-8218-5577-0
  • The War in the Dark. The True Power of the Secret Services. Eichborn, Frankfurt/Main, 2006, ISBN 3-8218-5578-9
  • The War in our Cities. As Radical Islamics Infiltrate Germany. Eichborn, Frankfurt/Main 2003, ISBN 3-596-16340-4

See: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/literatur/udo-ulfkotte-umstrittener-publizist-und-ehemaliger-faz-journalist-ist-tot-a-1130008.html




When it comes to these matters, strangely Israel seems to crop up somewhere.
From: https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2017/01/13/u-s-intelligence-officials-warning-israeli-counterparts-against-sharing-info-with-trump-administration/

Shared information could be leaked to Russia and onward to Iran, American officials implied to Israelis in closed meeting, saying Kremlin has ‘leverages of pressure’ over Trump, Ronen Bergman reports.

Haaretz

Israeli intelligence officials are concerned that the exposure of classified information to their American counterparts under a Trump administration could lead to their being leaked to Russia and onward to Iran, investigative journalist Ronen Bergman reported by Israeli daily Yediot Ahronot on Thursday.

The intelligence concerns, which have been discussed in closed forums recently, are based on suspicions of unreported ties between President-elect Donald Trump, or his associates, and the government of Vladimir Putin in Moscow.

As Russian intelligence is associated with intelligence officials in Tehran, highly classified information, such as Israel’s clandestine methods of operation and intelligence sources, could potentially reach Iran. Such information has been shared with the United States in the past.

American intelligence officials expressed despair at the election of Trump during a recent meeting with their Israeli counterparts, Bergman reported. They said that they believed that Putin had “leverages of pressure” over Trump, though they did not elaborate. The American media reported on Wednesday that Russia has embarrassing intelligence about the president-elect.

According to Bergman, the American intelligence officials implied that Israel should “be careful” when transferring intelligence information to the White House and the National Security Council (NSC) following Trump’s inauguration – at least until it is clear that Trump does not have inappropriate connections with Russia.

Cooperation between the Israeli and U.S. intelligence communities has intensified over the past two decades, with most of the joint operations directed, according to reports, against Iran. Hezbollah and Hamas were also intelligence targets. An official agreement in 2008 for comprehensive cooperation, including the exposure of sources and methods of action, reportedly led to impressive results, including the disruption of the Iranian nuclear program.
President Barack Obama put an end to offensive activity against Iran in 2013, at the start of secret talks between the U.S, and Iran over a nuclear agreement. However, the exposure of Israeli intelligence to the U.S. continued.
American officials are convinced that whistleblower Edward Snowden handed over intelligence to Moscow – in return for which he received political asylum – and that some of it was handed over to Tehran, in the context of Putin’s policy of increasing Iranian dependence on Moscow.