'Brave New Europe' (with apologies to Aldous)

You may like to watch this first before deciding if a Brave New Europe is upon us? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BDJBEf0-cA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WE4bikEvQng
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4News/videos/10153777390176939/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3613621/Handbag-carrying-woman-punched-face-rammed-against-railings-armed-police-officer-riots-spread-France.html




http://img11.deviantart.net/de4e/i/2012/125/0/7/take_a_soma_holiday___brave_new_world_by_corporalspycrab-d4ym6vv.png


I have just finished two books I haven't read before. How could I have lived so long and read so little? The two books are Aldous Huxley's, Brave New World  and Christopher Isherwood's Goodbye to Berlin. The former I found hard going. (In fact to be honest, I have yet to get to the end of it). The latter I consumed like a hungry cat! Perhaps it boils down to writing style, or subject or just personal preference?

The first looked forward, the other looked back, but both were very much of their time and circumstance. Now, over eighty years since they were written or published, we may ask if they have anything to offer in the current world of political ideas and decision making? Not least in the little 'local' issue of Britain's membership of the European Union (EU)?

The books were written in or about 1931. 'Brave New World' was published in the following year. In contrast, 'Goodbye to Berlin', actually a collection of related short stories, had to wait until 1939 to get into print. They couldn't be more different in style or content, although both emerge from the momentous events of the time, and the real or imagined threats that they created. Isherwood's portrayed a nascent fascism set in a decadent Berlin. History may repeat itself - as we are currently seeing with events across Europe.

Huxley's fear came from an opposite geographical direction, evoked by an American mass production society as exemplified by the Ford Motor Company. The 'Model 'T'' was still a comparatively new phenomenon. Characters in the book swear by 'Ford' not 'God' and are marked by a 'T' not a cross.

Both authors in their way, warned against the dangers of political fanaticism in the hands of an all-powerful and callous state. Neither could really know what the future would hold or the utter catastrophe to which it would lead.  (When Huxley did know in 1948, he penned the bitterly pessimistic 'Ape and Essence', which assumed a world taken over by primates intent on their own destruction.) Objectively looking back (or forward) we can hardly take the view it to be an over-statement of the human condition or world situation.

As with any futuristic novel, we with the benefit of hindsight and present knowledge, can compare and contrast with what actually emerged. The work is therefore not only judged on its literary merit but also it prophetic accuracy. However well-written, a personal account is no less esoteric, for it also takes us on a journey to a place and time of which we have little or no experience, creating it for us in the mind's eye, as if we were there. In both cases, whether literally true or not, it is a flight of fancy - a magic carpet of the imagination that widens our vistas and deepens our understanding.

For some reason this period of the early 20th Century was a time of literary soothsaying. As early as 1894 H.G. Wells' futuristic 'Time Machine' was published. 'Men Like Gods' followed in 1924 and is said to have influenced Huxley's work. (Claims of plagiarism were also subsequently levelled against Huxley by Polish author Mieczyslaw Smolarski.) It was the start of a new genre that has flourished since.

Yevgeny Zamyatin wrote 'We', a novel set in the 26th century A.D. and first published in English in 1924. It describes life in a 'One State' totalitarian regime. 'Last and First Men' by Olaf Stapledon (1930), 'Anthem' by Ayn Rand (1938) and '1984' by George Orwell (1949) are other early and notable examples of the dystopian genre. Ayn Rand has had her own following and influence on political and economic ideas since - particularly in the United States. 'Trumpism' may be one result of it - yet to reveal its full implications for the world.

Huxley's Brave New World portrays a hedonistic society and a 'World State', where stability and numbed 'happiness' are achieved by sophisticated eugenics, a five tiered caste system and drug ('Soma') dependence. Old attitudes to family, love-based relationship and religion are eradicated, replaced by total loyalty to the state and its objectives. Some might argue a great deal of this has actually come to pass in the world, with the added advantage that the general population is unaware that it has! Is the EU its partial fulfillment?

When we note the huge divergence in wealth, which has never been greater; the contrast between the physical circumstances of one segment of the world's population and another; the swathes of destruction, destitution and displacement - a 'caste system' in all but name; the way in which television and entertainment industry have been used to pacify and subtly brainwash the population; the abandonment of ancient religious perspectives; the pursuit of hedonistic objectives of sex, money, fame and possessions; the rape and pollution of the earth and the callous disregard for human and other living things; 'heroic medicine' with its promise of freedom from pain and disease (of course another illusion); intervention in the reproductive process, both to create and abort human offspring; the endemic use of mind-altering and other chemicals; yet paradoxically humanity beset by despair and depression as never before; we might consider Huxley was indeed pretty accurate in his prediction.

Even so, it may surprise us to learn that such was the anxiety it created in power circles that it gained the reputation for one of the most banned books. From the first it caused controversy, banned by several countries. As late as 1993 an unsuccessful attempt was made to remove it from a California school's' required reading list. It would appear it still packs a punch.

Turning to the very different 'Goodbye to Berlin', here we are immersed in stories of personal relationships in the early '30's both funny and tragic, as Europe careered towards unprecedented death and destruction. Whilst reading it, I could not escape the thought that virtually all the people and interiors described, all the nicknacks and possessions, were no more, utterly destroyed in the bombardment that was to occur a decade and a half later. Indeed many were destroyed physically or mentally within the stories themselves. Here are described the first inklings of Nazi 'anti semitism' and its evil consequences that we hear so much about today.

Sometimes Isherwood, of whom it was sometime said that, "He could never describe a character if they were out of the room" can sometimes be laugh-out-loud funny as well as surgically descriptive. This passage for example:

"In the flat directly beneath ours lives a certain Frau Glanterneck. She is a Galician Jewess, in itself a reason why Frau Mayr should be her enemy: for Frau Mayr, needless to say, is an ardent Nazi. And quite apart from this, it seems that Frau Glanterneck and Frau Mayr once had words on the stairs about Frau Mayr's yodelling. Frau Glanterneck, perhaps because she is a non-aryan, said that she preferred the noises made by cats. Thereby, she insulted all Baverian, all German women: and it was Frau Mayr's pleasant duty to avenge them."

See how in illuminating the way in which prejudice works out in humdrum practice, potentially leading to malicious acts, he also manages to 'cock a snoot' at the ridulous yet dangerous philosophy of Natzism - indeed all racial stereotyping. Even minor insults can be used to justify quite disproportionate revenge.

Both Berlin and the EU have of course risen, phoenix-like, from the ashes of Hitler and the Third Reich. Some now believe the EU is its putative replacement. Since Lisbon there have been further indications of an intention to move towards political fusion and statehood. A 'President', a common foreign policy, European Arrest Warants and exchange of more intelligenge particularly as it relates to 'terrorism', common border enforcement and action on refugees/migrants, even combined military units, some of which have been on unreported exercises in Britain only recently.

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2014/03-overflow/orwell-huxley-world.png

It was Ian Kershaw, who on the 70th anniversary of the Hitler’s rise to power, drew attention to the world's obsession with 'him' and 'it': "It seems as if scarcely a day goes by without Hitler and the Nazis in one way or another – in newspapers, films, books, on radio and television – entering into our public consciousness." Indeed a new 'Law' has been created, referred to as 'Godwin’s Law'? This dictates that sooner or later every discussion on the internet - indeed anywhere - will revert to a  comparison involving Nazis or Hitler! No doubt the reader will have experienced or even fulfilled, 'Godwin's Law' at sometime or other?

So bringing the discussion belatedly around to the topic in hand (you will never have guessed) we find Godwin's Law most recently wheeled out by the flamboyant (ex)mayor of London, Boris Johnson - heir apparent to be leader of the Conservative Party and even Prime Minister - who likened the EU to Hitler's Third Reich. He is not the first to do so. Similarly the Leader of the Opposition, Jeremy Corbyn and Ken Livingstone, got into hot water over the latter linking Hitler with Zionism, perhaps proof not only of Godwin's Law, but also the modern taboo of criticising Israel in any way.  

It has often been said that although Britain (with a little help from its friends!) won the war, Germany won the peace. It did so largely by diverting its economy and applying its technical expertise from militarism to manufacture; eschewing pomp, circumstance and self congratulation for determined reconstruction based on the export of goods and quiet influence; not 'getting cross but getting even'! Nor can we overlook the fact that the establishment of Israel, and all the misery consequent on it, could hardly have been possible without the holocaust and Second World War. Germany is now the undisputed economic master of the EU which if anything will be enhanced if Britain leaves.

Some even claim that through 'Operation Paperclip' and other covert means, defeated Germany had a huge influence over American military and secret service development, that can be traced through all the later western milestones of the 20th and 21st Centuries. Paradoxically it is a German/Jewish hegemonic thread, thus negating one of Hitler's principal objectives, to remove Jewish influence. There is some recent credible evidence that a German/Jewish cadre dominated post-war American foreign policy and disproportionately filled top Administration posts. There are even some that argue because of it, CIA turned a 'blind eye' to the fact that Adolf Hitler did not commit suicide but rather with American help, relocated to Argentina!

Both Huxley and Isherwood moved to the United States, Huxley from 1937 to his death in 1963 and Isherwood (with W.H. Auden) moving there in 1949 - caricatured by Evelyn Waugh as the two despicable and cowardly poets, "Parsnip and Pimpernel". Isherwood became an American citizen in 1946 and remained so until his death in Santa Monica, California on 4 January 1986 aged 81. Huxley and Isherwood maintained a close friendship from that time onwards.

Hardly noticed is the fact that in one of those strange historical coincidences (another is that Isaac Newton was born in the very year that Galileo Galilei died!) Huxley and C.S. Lewis both passed away on the same day President Kennedy lost his life to a US Government conspiracy and thus in virtual anonymity. 'Brave New World' indeed.

The "Brexit" vote in the UK draws ever closer. We are told it is a "close run thing". Of course leaving the European Union or 'EU' as it is commonly called, is not the same as leaving Europe geographically, culturally economically or politically. Unless Britain is towed to the east coast of America and becomes the 51st state (God forbid!) it cannot change its geographical location to the European land mass, to which only a few thousand years ago, it was physically attached. Nor can it ever relinquish its long shared historical and cultural history. Needless to say, as an important destination market for much of what European manufacturers and agriculture produce, it is unlikely to be cut off by them.

Where would Britain be without Roman civilization, Italian renaissance, French Philosophe, German composers or all the other influences that found their way from the mainland to this little offshore island? The indigenous tribes craved the sophistication, ideas and skills of mainland countries whilst remaining infuriating aloof and independent, particularly after Henry VIII broke with Rome, merely to have his wicked way with Ann Boleyn - a very brief and tragic affair! By the eighteenth century, no young aristocrat's education was complete without the obligatory 'Grand Tour', invariably ending up in Rome, to where of course 'all roads lead'. It can be no accident that the EEC was formed by a treaty between six nations signed there in 1957 and called "The Treaty of Rome". It would be the first of several to increase the number of members (currently twenty eight) and deepen the political nature of the organisation.

The EU is a clumsy and inefficient organisation. It has to wrestle with the fact that it is a conflation of 28 countries and 24 'official' languages and many more 'unofficial' ones. It pretends to be is democratic when it isn't. The representative 'parliament' has effectively no power and few of the general public know what those powers are or how it functions and even fewer know who their MEP is or what they do. 

The organisation is actually run by ministers from member states and the 'Commissioners' they appoint.  It is also essentially corrupt, insofar its accounts have not been signed off for decades! No accountant can be found prepared to do the job, unable to determine with certainty where the money has gone!

All in all, it is a compromise that is working towards the unachievable 'United States of Europe'. The compromise and tension comes from pretending to speak for the whole of Europe when constituent states also want to retain their independence and freedom to act. It tries to reconcile this with its philosophy of 'subsidiarity' or devolving every decision or implementation, to the most local level possibility. In practice decision-making goes ever-upwards away from the locality, becoming ever more remote and unrepresentative of the public mood.
(A work in progress!)

FURTHER INFORMATION:

Aldous Huxley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TQZ-2iMUR0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4XMC3WPFto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PbhkML007Q

Christopher Isherwood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx09mDenhKU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rKiSjD-Q1E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjeONfq9orU

Ayn Rand
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ooKsv_SX4Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdeI9NfbfT8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uHSv1asFvU

George Orwell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY5Ste5xRAA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuVYvkdTYWc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJL3pSiC1uc

Another Suspicious Aircrash! (MS804) (Updated)

(I have had major problems posting this item, probably because of the copied graphics, so will now post the up-dated version as text only. As always with these high-profile 'terrorist events', there appears to be several inexplicable elements, in particular relating to the actions of the pilots and timing. Perhaps someone will be able to explain them?)

At 2.30 am local time (00.30 GMT) on Thursday 19th May, 2016, contact was lost with an EgyptAir (flight MS804) Airbus A320 south of Greek island of Karpathos 16km/10 miles inside Egyptian airspace. It was en route from Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport to Cairo.

The plane departed from Paris at 11:09 p.m. local time. It was expected to arrive in Cairo at 3:15 a.m. local time. The plane disappeared at about 2:30 a.m. local time. The airline initially said the plane went missing at 2:45 a.m. local time and it was supposed to arrive at 3:05 a.m.

TIMELINE CONFUSION?

From the Guardian here, (http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2016/may/19/egyptair-plane-cairo-paris-live-updates?page=with:block-573d9b4ae4b04a0378340f77) reporting Greek sources, the timeline is given as follows. You will see that it is difficult to reconcile with other reports as the disappearance time is given as 03.39 not 02.29 as previously stated!

THIS CONFUSION OVER TIMING REALLY NEEDS TO BE CLEARED UP!

02:24: EgyptAir flight 804 from Paris to Cairo enters Greek airspace, air traffic controller permissions it for the remainder of its course. 

02:48: The flight is transferred to the next air traffic control sector and is cleared for exit from Greek airspace. “The pilot was in good spirits and thanked the controller in Greek.”

03:27: Athens air traffic control tries to contact the aircraft to convey information on the switch of communications and control from Athens to Cairo air traffic. In spite of repeated calls, the aircraft does not respond, whereupon the air traffic controller calls the distress frequency, without a response from the aircraft.

03:29: It is above the exit point (from Greek airspace).

03:39:40: The aircraft signal is lost, approximately 7 nautical miles south/southeast of the KUMBI point, within Cairo FIR.
Immediately the assistance of radars of the Hellenic Air Force is requested to detect the target, without result.

03:45: The processes of search and rescue are initiated, simultaneously informing the Flight Information Region of Cairo.

11.09 pm local time (2109 GMT) plane leaves Paris heading to Cairo, Egypt

TIME? Last contact between pilot and Greek Air Traffic Control when "the pilot had not mentioned a problem" in his final contact, the Greek authorities reported. The time for this given above was 02.48 (ie after the plane by other accounts was already lost!) “The pilot was in good spirits and thanked the controller in Greek.”

TIME? When moving from Greek to Egyptian controlled airspace, the captain failed to respond to routine contact by Greek Air Traffic Controllers. For an experienced pilot this is extremely unusual and may either point to the Captain and Co-Pilot's inability to do so for some reason, or a mechanical breakdown in wireless communication for some reason. Remote blocking cannot be ruled out.

2.26 - 2.29 am (local time) (0026 - 0029 GMT) ACARS records fire and other alarms going off inside cabin.

2.29 am local time (0029 GMT) Flight MS804 disappears from the radar, the Greek civil aviation authority says. "48-64km from Egypt's northern coast" EgyptAir's Vice President Ahmed Adel said. It would be helpful if we knew who's radar it was on, Greek or Egyptian or both? The plane fell 6,705 metres (22,000 feet) and swerved sharply in Egyptian airspace before it disappeared from radar screens, Greece's defence minister Panos Kammenos says.

2.50 am (0050) Reports there were failed attempts to contact the plane Sherif Fathy says and adds "the last contact was at 2.30" by which we assume he means radar not speech contact?

2.45 am (0045 GMT) Reported time of plane crashing into sea. (Is this reliable?)

03:27: Athens air traffic control tries to contact the aircraft to convey information on the switch of communications and control from Athens to Cairo air traffic. In spite of repeated calls, the aircraft does not respond, whereupon the air traffic controller calls the distress frequency, without a response from the aircraft.

So how are we to make ANY SENSE of this report in the Guardian that places the timing  later. If as indicated it is GMT it would be three hours later. If referring to 'am' it appears to be an HOUR later. Or is this reference to Egypt local time? Wouldn't it be a good idea for clarity if everyone stuck to the GMT equivalent so we knew where we were time-wise?

"Greek defence sources are describing time frame between 03:27 to 03:29 as “critical point”, writes Helena Smith.

It was in this two minute period when the plane made a 90 degree swerve left and dropped from 37,000 feet to 15,000 feet before swerving 360 degrees right and vanishing at 10,000 feet ten to 15 miles inside Egyptian air space.

The Greek defence minister Panos Kammenos told reporters in Athens that the country had also scrambled F16 fighter jets to participate in the operation to locate the aircraft off the south eastern Aegean island of Karpathos.

Greek officials are hoping satellite footage may help locate the wreckage."

Source: http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2016/may/19/egyptair-plane-cairo-paris-live-updates?page=with:block-573d9b4ae4b04a0378340f77

All 66 people on board - consisting of five crew and three security personnel plus 56 passengers - are feared dead. The nationalities of the passengers were as follows: 30 Egyptians, 15 French, two Iraqis, and one each from the UK, Belgium, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Chad, Portugal, Algeria and Canada. No names or identities have been issued as yet. 

No Emergency Call

No emergency call was made by captain or crew suggesting a sudden and catastrophic disabling event. Rather curiously EgyptAir reported that two hours after the planes disappearance from radio and radar contact (4.25 local time) the planes emergency beacon signal was received, presumably because it was still afloat?

Of course this is but the latest of a series of disastrous aircraft losses in 'terrorist' or otherwise suspiciously unexplained circumstances over recent years. There appears to have been a spate of them with recurring features that raise serious questions of air security, safety and what actually is the true cause and motivating factors.

ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System).

It is reported that the Acars system recorded the following technical faults that probably suggest explosion within the cabin:

00:26Z 3044 ANTI ICE R WINDOW

00:26Z 561200 R SLIDING WINDOW SENSOR

00:26Z 2600 SMOKE LAVATORY SMOKE

00:27Z 2600 AVIONICS SMOKE

00:28Z 561100 R FIXED WINDOW SENSOR

00:29Z 2200 AUTO FLT FCU 2 FAULT

00:29Z 2700 F/CTL SEC 3 FAULT

Only an aviation expert can properly interpret these readings but they appear to suggest an explosion or fire of some sort within the cabin. Fire alarms were set off within the toilets apparently. It shows that smoke was detected in the aircraft lavatory at 2.26 am, with a second sensor going off a minute later with further faults until 2.29 am, when the system ceased recording. The final two alerts from the plane indicate faults with the FCU - the flight control unit used by the pilot to input instructions into the flight computer - and the SEC 3 - the computer that controls the plane's spoilers and elevator computers.

At 00.29am GMT (2.29 am local time), the aircraft was over the exit point of the Athens FIR, and at 00.29.40am GMT, it vanished from radar. These two reports fit and suggest the plane disappeared from radar at the same time the ACARS system report the smoke and other problems. However it conflicts with the report (below) that it disappeared at 2.45 am. Which is to  be believed?

If the latter it would suggest that the plane continued flying for a further 19 minutes before being lost to radar at 2.45 am local time without any communication from the Captain! They do not explain the failure of the captain to respond to Greek air traffic control or send out a mayday call or the time lapse between that and the crash itself, nor indeed the final extraordinary trajectory in its last moments.

Trajectory

The plane made “sudden swerves” before dropping off radar over the Mediterranean, reportedly making a 90-degree turn left, and dropping from 37,000 feet to 15,000 feet before swerving 360 degrees right. No explanation has yet been given for these extraordinary manoeuvres that will not become clear until the 'black boxes' have been recovered (if they are).

Debris Found

Rather strangely, it is reported that debris has been found  miles SE of the planes last located position. If the map below can be relied upon this is some 500 miles from its last known position. Given the trajectory of the last moments of the plane, this distance could only be explained by ocean drift for which there has been insufficient time. See map below.

Impact of 9/11 'Hi-Jackings'

No consideration of this important subject can ignore the events of 9/11 in America that set the scene for misrepresentation of events involving aircraft and their use by 'terrorists'. The 19 'terrorists', mainly of Saudi nationality, blamed for hi-jacking and flying the four 'planes' (at least one (at the Pentagon) was clearly NOT a plane but a missile!) could NOT have done the job, as they could scarcely fly a Cessna. This means that there must be some other explanation for the aircraft and that in fact they were different - probably unpiloted military - aircraft entirely. This is supported by what photographic evidence there is of the second aircraft to strike the North Tower. 

All this of course is very old ground with much else besides, but it serves to prove that America was prepared, and technically able, to sabotage aircraft, indifferent to the consequences to life and property, in order to pursue aggressive warfare abroad. We, the people of the world should never forget this most fundamental lesson. There is clear circumstantial evidence that the scurrilous technique has been repeated in other 'terrorist events' on the ground or in the air, either by the same caucus or by subsidiary or aligned parties working in concert. 

International Problem

This is a profoundly serious situation that the international community needs to address, but appears singularly unwilling to do so. Instead it prefers to support the untenable fabrications put out by government. This particularly applies to 9/11 but also to later events that all appear to support a narrative intended to exacerbate relations between western powers and essentially Muslim countries and Russia, although China is not far behind.

So what events that demonstrate disinformation that undermine credibility in the stated explanations and may point to dark causes by date and topic in receding order do I have in mind? Many of these have been previously discussed on this blog site and elsewhere. (The search box in the top left corner will turn them up if anyone wishes to pursue them) In the meantime here is my list.

A Few Recent Suspicious/Disastrous Events

DATE.                     EVENT.

18.5.16                            EgyptAir (flight MS804) Airbus A320 south of Greek island of Karpathos. Cause undetermined.


17.5.16                            A Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) Italian-made training aircraft crash in a paddy field in Nenasi, near here this afternoon. Unspecified technical difficulties.




29.4.16                            CHC Helikopter Service Eurocopter EC225 Super Puma helicopter. Mechanical failure.


24.4.16                            Germanwings Airbus A320 4U 9525 over the Alps. Pilot blamed (suicide)




22.3.16                            Two suicide bombers, carrying explosives in large suitcases, attacked a
departure hall at Brussels Airport in Zaventem.Location‎: ‎Brussels Airport in
Zaventem plus bomb on tube. ISIS terrorists blamed.


9.2.16                              Two Meridian-branded passenger trains were involved in a head-on collision at Bad Aibling in southeastern Germany. Human error blamed.


13.11.15                          Paris suicide bombing/shooting. ISIS terrorists.


31.10.15                          Russian Airbus A321, KGL9628 flying from Sharm el-Sheikh to Moscow crashes over Sinai. ISIS bomb blamed.


17.8.15                            Jakarta, Indonesia (CNN) Indonesian Trigana's ATR 42-300 turboprop aircraft before it lost contact Sunday down in a mountainous area. The loss Sunday of the Trigana plane is Indonesia's third air disaster in less than eight months.

In December, AirAsia Flight QZ8501 went down in the Java Sea while headed from Surabaya, Indonesia, to Singapore. All 162 people on board were killed. And in June, an Indonesian military transport plane crashed soon after taking off from the city of Medan, killing at least 135 people.

14.1.15                             Charlie Hebdo shooting, Paris. ISIS gunmen.

17.7.15                             Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 Flight MH17 crashed after being hit by a Russian-made Buk missile over eastern Ukraine. Russian-backed separatists blamed

8.3.14                               Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370/MAS370) disappears over S China sea. Cause remains unknown. Blamed on pilots initially.


In virtually every one of these the official explanations do not add up in one form or another.

For a world-wide list of allegedly ISIS attacks or those claimed by them see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_linked_to_ISIL

Also: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/

Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_airliner_bombing_attacks

Distinguishing Between the Genuine and Fake

We have become somewhat used to catastrophic aeroplane accidents in recent years, circumstances that range through relatively straightforward mechanical or human errors, through 'terrorist' events, to those that rather bizarrely, defy all reasonable explanation.

Where a logical or truthful explanation is not forthcoming, it provides the opportunity for more 'exotic' ones, including intentional acts by governments in pursuit of some political or military objective. 

Despite all the 'fog and mirrors' that surround such events, one thing you can be sure of, the culprits are unlikely to admit responsibility and where they do, no one can be sure if it can be relied upon or that it reflects the true perpetrator. Since 9/11 at least we have all learned to be highly sceptical and suspicious of official explanations of tragic events. That may be the only good thing to come out of it.

The problem is distinguishing between the 'genuine' terrorist event, organised and perpetrated by disaffected individuals or groups independent of government and those carried out by government agencies to be blamed on the named terrorist group - currently most commonly 'ISIS'. The fact that in large measure ISIS is a front organisation for western interests, set up, financed, encouraged and controlled by the west and its allies in the Middle East, of course takes us full circle in a very murky, discreditable business. By and large, it is nation states with the technical expertise, the trained men, the munitions, to carry out these sophisticated operations, including the propaganda to sell the approved version, rather than disorganised and virtually illiterate individuals and groups.

An unusual feature in several of these aircraft incidents, is the erratic or hard to explain events that happen immediately before the crash. First gaining altitude before precipitous loss of same. Also the common loss of communication and lack of emergency procedures. In the case of MH370 a sudden increase in altitude followed by a very untypical maneuver. In the case of MH17 a very unconvincing explanation for the crash. In the GermanWings case an increase in altitude before setting the autopilot (why autopilot?) to a crash trajectory. Then even more strangely ineffective attempts to pull up using the joystick? Questions as to cause in the Russian Airbus A321 crash suspiciously close to an Israeli communications base. Now with the EgyptAir crash reports of erratic flight-path movements before falling from 38,000 ft.

Remote Control of Aircraft Systems

Those investigating the causes of crashes or incidents have a difficult job especially when wreckage has to be retrieved (if it can be located) from the oceans. But since the beginning of the 21st Century, and particularly the events of 9/11, the potential for remote control of aircraft systems can never be ruled out, nor covert action by those with the technical capability, to be blamed on those not responsible, or acting covertly for the very agencies that blame them! We shall have to wait and see whether this latest example fits the mould. Egypt and its economy, largely dependant on tourism, and playing into the hands of an Israeli/Saudi connection, certainly appears to be a target at the moment. Nor can Paris, target of two major terrorist incidents, be forgotten. If the cause of the crash was an explosive device, the question of airport security and who is/was responsible for it (a major issue in the Brussels Airport incident) when Paris was on a heightened terrorist security alert, must be a big issue.

The Environmental and Social Implications of Air Travel

The world is now, for the first time in human history, subject to continuous aircraft activity, allowing people to travel from one place to another as never before, but not without some very serious consequences to the atmosphere, land and sea. Atmospheric pollution, noise and development all result. Some of the issues have been brought into sharp focus in the matter of the controversial third runway at London's Heathrow airport, held up by excessive NOX (oxides of nitrogen) and other pollutants but replicated in cities around the world where planes land and take off.

The contamination of the atmosphere in the form of 'chemtrails', either from the products of fuel combustion or active 'seeding' with chemicals to affect weather patterns, not to mention the matter of fuel dumping or even the part aircraft play in the delivery of explosives in warfare, are all hot topics with which we cannot afford to be complacent. All talk is about CO2 which conveniently detracts and distracts from these issues, that see no sign of anything but getting worse before they get better.

Aircraft Crashes Recorded

The complex nature of the subject is best illustrated by reference to visual representation and facts here: http://aviation.globalincidentmap.com/. You will see that in May so far this year, no less than fifty four crash or emergency landing incidents are recorded, most of which get cursory or no mention on global news channels. Only the incidents involving a large loss of life or notable personages, tend to get wide publicity. Of course the whole issue of how 'news stories' are covered or not covered, is a subject in itself. Nor should we be naive enough to rule out the possibility that government may have had a big hand in manipulating it. Indeed I believe this should be the first question to be posed when blanket coverage is given to an incident and its stated cause.

So we should first establish the fact that there are indeed thousands of potentially dangerous incidents happening all the time and that these seldom get high profile attention from the media. Even the stories of large scale tragedies quickly become 'old news' and pass into history. Government through its accident investigation agencies tend to control the narrative and few challenge it. In this way false information can be promulgated and perpetuated. The incidents listed above and below may be exceptional and unrepresentative of a much bigger topic of air accidents but they have been chosen precisely for this reason and to illustrate the way they have been used for a particular political purpose.

Germanwings Flight 9525 crash

The Mail has this:"A new twist in the tragic saga of the doomed Germanwings plane - which crashed with the loss of 150 lives in the French Alps in March - indicates killer pilot Andreas Lubitz may have tried to save the aircraft at the last minute.

Just 93 seconds before the Airbus jetliner slammed into the mountainside the black box flight recorders showed Lubitz, 27, apparently trying to override the automatic descent mechanism which he triggered when captain Patrick Sondenheimer left the cockpit to use the toilet.

Lubitz, plagued by depression and suicidal thoughts, locked the captain out of the flight deck so he could put his suicide plan into play. 
But, according to French air safety investigators who released a 29-page interim report on Wednesday about the crash based on black box data of the doomed Germanwings Flight 4U9525, there is evidence that he tried to manually take charge of the aircraft again shortly before the crash."
This data shows that there was a movement of the sidestick of the Airbus A-320. In the log it says 'between 10:39:33 and 10:40:07 there was a recorded sidestick input (manual movement) with low amplitude (vibrations) on the co-pilot side.'

In the 'conclusions' of the report this is summed up: 'One minute and 33 seconds before impact the FDR (flight data recorder) recorded a control input of 30 seconds on the right side stick controller, who was not strong enough to turn off the autopilot.'

Prof. Elmar Giemulla, a lawyer for victims and an expert on air travel law, told German newspaper Bild that 'we will never know what moved him in these seconds'. She added that a 'stronger pressure on the side stick' would have automatically disabled the autopilot."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3071932/Germanwings-pilot-tried-avoid-Alps-crash-minute.html#ixzz487DqyPZw

31st October, 2015.  Russian Airbus A321, KGL9628 flying from Sharm el-Sheikh to Moscow crashes over Sinai.

Operated by the Russian airline Kogalymavia. Owned and leased from Irish company. Assembled Germany 1997.  Took off from Sharm el-Sheikh airport at 05:58 (03:58 GMT) on 31 October, 2015. At 06:14 Egyptian time (04:14 GMT), the plane failed to make scheduled contact with air traffic control based in Larnaca, Cyprus. The plane disappeared from radar screens six minutes later while flying over central Sinai. Egyptian authorities said no SOS calls were received by air traffic controllers. All on board (224) killed. 

Islamic State (IS) affiliate, known as 'Sinai Province' take responsibility for bringing down plane. In this article (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25882504) the BBC portrays the group as a terrorist group with parallel aims and philosophy to ISIS, including the creation of sophisticated propaganda film, having carried out more than 31 attacks in 2016 alone. It does not answer the question who funds and controls it, or why in this arid vast space the alleged 'training camps', cannot be located and 'neutralised' by either Israel or Egyptian military if so desired. 

Without any substantiation of any link, Egyptian efforts to isolate Gaza are highlighted, as if Gaza didn't have enough problems already!  The suspicion must lurk that just like ISIS, Sinai Province it is a front for and construct of, American/Israeli/Saudi policy. At a most basic level, what advantage could there be for Arab 'freedom fighters' to further inflame a major power like Russia, that could only add to its woes?

The following is taken from Christopher Bollyn's web page here: 

http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15282

The Russian aircraft went down south of Al Arish, near the border of Israel, very close to Israel's main cyber warfare and computer hacking facility, Unit 8200, located on Kibbutz Urim. Cyber warfare is defined as "actions by a nation-state to penetrate another nation's computers or networks for the purposes of causing damage or disruption." Graphic: The Telegraph.

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT 8200 - Israel's main satellite signal intelligence facility is located on Kibbutz Urim, less than 60 miles NNE of the location where the Russian plane went down. Unit 8200, an institution of computer hackers, is the largest branch of the IDF and is responsible for the military’s offensive cyber capabilities. The Telegraph reported in 2010, "The Negev desert based Unit 8200 has evolved from the signal intelligence arm of the Israeli military into a respected leader in high technology warfare."

- See more at: http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15282 http://www.bollyn.com/



Legal moves to seek 9/11 compensation from Iraq!!!! Quotes from other sources for information:

"Kreindler & Kreindler represented many of the 9/11 victims, both in the victim's compensation fund and in litigation against the security companies and airlines. The firm took a leading role in challenging, unsuccessfully, what it claimed was a de facto cap on payments in the VCF, based on the regulations and comments made by VCF Special Master Kenneth Feinberg. The firm also brought litigation against the terrorists and individuals and entities it claimed were terrorist sponsors. This included a lawsuit for several billion dollars against Iraq, based on an allegation that Iraqi officials were aware of plans to attack America." From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreindler_%26_Kreindler

 "Kreindler & Kreindler Law Firm is a Cynical CIA Psyop Tool" - I originally posted this data in 2006. My motto: "The cover-up proves the crime." K&K is on intimate terms with the CIA, and has been central to covering up a score of covert ops/mass murders. K&K was also, as documented, instrumental in selling the American public on the Iraq War with a psychological operation falsely linking Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and the A-Bomb. Fox News: " ... Kreindler & Kreindler, a Park Ave. law firm that has been working overtime to establish a money trail leading from Saddam Inc.’s amassed loot to al-Qaeda’s coffers. ... " Yes, it's that kind of law firm ... Jim Kreindler on 9/11: "Immediately I suspected a terrorist attack and I found myself thinking about another terrorist event that dominated the attention of our law firm since 1988 – the bombing of Pan Am 103 by operatives

of the Libyan government. ... " Sure-sure ... From: http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/flight-3407-kreindler-kreindler-cons.html

"For example, while representing 9/11 victims, New York’s Kreindler & Kreindler law firm filed a Freedom of Information request for a copy of a May 2000 memo about a meeting OFAC officials had with two of Osama bin Laden’s half-brothers, as well as a subsequent letter about the meeting from the Saudi Binladin Group, the large construction conglomerate founded by Osama bin Laden’s father. Both documents are cited in the 9/11 Commission’s report."

OFAC denied the 2009 request saying, among other things, that the release of those records would constitute “a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,” presumably of the bin Ladens.

OFAC also asserted personal privacy and national security considerations in 2006 when refusing to release nearly 700 pages of records about the International Islamic Relief Organization, a Saudi charity whose branches in Indonesia and the Philippines were specially designated by OFAC as terrorist entities for funding al Qaeda." From: http://www.floridabulldog.org/2015/09/9-11-anniversary-secret-records-fbi-cia-terrorist-attacks/




"One June 28, 2013, WMR reported on another CIA base, the Pinal Air Park/Marana Airfield outside of Tucson, Arizona. It was this facility that drew the interest of retired Boeing 757 and 767 pilot, Iran-contra CIA contractor pilot, and 9/11 author Phil Marshall. In January 2013, the Calaveras County Sheriff’s Department concluded, after a botched investigation, that Marshall shot himself to death after having shot and killed his two teen-age children and the family dog. Pinal is the home to America’s “boneyard” of retired civilian aircraft, including Boeing passenger aircraft. Nearby Davis-Monthan Air Force Base is the home to the boneyard of retired military aircraft. In addition, the CIA and U.S. Special Forces maintain operations at Pinal, the CIA through its contractor, Evergreen International. A former CIA official who was involved in the CIA’s planning of the Iran-contra “arms-for-hostages; Iranian profits for the contras” operation confirmed that Evergreen had a close working relationship with the firm PTech, a firm with connections to the Saudi royal family and Israel’s Mossad and which had contracts to provide computer software support to the Department of Defense, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Justice, FBI, and the Secret Service from 1997 until 9/11. The firm continues to provide software support for classified U.S. military projects." From: http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/14079#sthash.7iIqikYL.dpuf

"WMR has learned from a number of sources who are familiar with the operations of Moyock, Harvey Point, and Pinal that the three secret installations played a part in the planning and carrying out of the 9/11 attacks. Pinal provided the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft that were retrofitted to be flown remotely into the World Trade Center’s North and South Towers. WMR has not confirmed whether the Boeing 757 that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, was remotely-flown but there were no bodies spotted or recovered by the Somerset County coroner after the crash." From: http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/14079
http://www.bollyn.com/

SOME INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS ON THE NUMEROLOGY OF TERRORIST 
EVENTS

"Published on 19 May 2016

The May 19, 2016 story of missing EgyptAir Flight 804 is contrived bullshit. There is no such plane, it never existed. This story is directly connected to the missing plane story of MH-370 from March 8, 2014, another plane that never existed. Learn about how the Jews and Masons who control the media stage these incidents and contrive these stories for the sake of agenda and ongoing riddles leading up to bigger events. Read more below:"

HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP4E4-6AzRM

AND STRANGE COINCIDENCES HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=145&v=I6vYdKaHwFg

SIMULTANEOUS MILITARY EXERCISES:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-KsA1_Vv90

Another Suspicious Aircrash! (MS804)



CREDIT: REX


At 2.30 am local time (00.30 GMT) on Thursday 19th May, 2016, contact was lost with an EgyptAir (flight MS804) Airbus A320 south of Greek island of Karpathos 16km/10 miles inside Egyptian airspace. It was en route from Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport to Cairo.

 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/19/radar-map-shows-the-route-of-egyptair-flight-ms804-before-it-los/

All 66 people on board - consisting of five crew and three security personnel plus 56 passengers - are feared dead. The nationalities of the passengers were as follows: 30 Egyptians, 15 French, two Iraqis, and one each from the UK, Belgium, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Chad, Portugal, Algeria and Canada. No names or identities have been issued as yet. 

No Emergency Call

No emergency call was made by captain or crew suggesting a sudden and catastrophic disabling event. Rather curiously EgyptAir reported that two hours after the planes disappearance from radio and radar contact (4.25 local time) the planes emergency beacon signal was received, presumably because it was still afloat?

Of course this is but the latest of a series of disastrous aircraft losses in 'terrorist' or otherwise suspiciously unexplained circumstances over recent years. There appears to have been a spate of them with recurring features that raise serious questions of air security, safety and what actually is the true cause and motivating factors.

Impact of 9/11 'Hi-Jackings'

No consideration of this important subject can ignore the events of 9/11 in America that set the scene for misrepresentation of events involving aircraft and their use by 'terrorists'. The 19 'terrorists', mainly of Saudi nationality, blamed for hi-jacking and flying the four 'planes' (at least one (at the Pentagon) was clearly NOT a plane but a missile!) could NOT have done the job, as they could scarcely fly a Cessna. This means that there must be some other explanation for the aircraft and that in fact they were different - probably unpiloted military - aircraft entirely. This is supported by what photographic evidence there is of the second aircraft to strike the North Tower. 

All this of course is very old ground with much else besides, but it serves to prove that America was prepared, and technically able, to sabotage aircraft, indifferent to the consequences to life and property, in order to pursue aggressive warfare abroad. We, the people of the world should never forget this most fundamental lesson. There is clear circumstantial evidence that the scurrilous technique has been repeated in other 'terrorist events' on the ground or in the air, either by the same caucus or by subsidiary or aligned parties working in concert. 

International Problem

This is a profoundly serious situation that the international community needs to address, but appears singularly unwilling to do so. Instead it prefers to support the untenable fabrications put out by government. This particularly applies to 9/11 but also to later events that all appear to support a narrative intended to exacerbate relations between western powers and essentially Muslim countries and Russia, although China is not far behind.

So what events that demonstrate disinformation that undermine credibility in the stated explanations and may point to dark causes by date and topic in receding order do I have in mind? Many of these have been previously discussed on this blog site and elsewhere. (The search box in the top left corner will turn them up if anyone wishes to pursue them) In the meantime here is my list.

A Few Recent Suspicious/Disastrous Events

DATE.                     EVENT.

18.5.16                   EgyptAir (flight MS804) Airbus A320 south of Greek island of Karpathos. Cause undetermined.

17.5.16                    A Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) Italian-made training aircraft crash in a paddy field in Nenasi, near here this afternoon. Unspecified technical difficulties.

29.4.16                    CHC Helikopter Service Eurocopter EC225 Super Puma helicopter. Mechanical failure.

24.4.16                   Germanwings Airbus A320 4U 9525 over the Alps. Pilot blamed (suicide)

22.3.16 

                   Two suicide bombers, carrying explosives in large suitcases, attacked a
departure hall at Brussels Airport in Zaventem.Location‎: ‎Brussels Airport in
Zaventem plus bomb on tube. ISIS terrorists blamed.

9.2.16                      Two Meridian-branded passenger trains were involved in a head-on collision at Bad Aibling in southeastern Germany. Human error blamed.

13.11.15                   Paris suicide bombing/shooting. ISIS terrorists.

31.10.15                  Russian Airbus A321, KGL9628 flying from Sharm el-Sheikh to               Moscow crashes over Sinai. ISIS bomb blamed.

17.8.15                     Jakarta, Indonesia (CNN) Indonesian Trigana's ATR 42-300 turboprop aircraft before it lost contact Sunday down in a mountainous area. The loss Sunday of the Trigana plane is Indonesia's third air disaster in less than eight months.

In December, AirAsia Flight QZ8501 went down in the Java Sea while headed from Surabaya, Indonesia, to Singapore. All 162 people on board were killed. And in June, an Indonesian military transport plane crashed soon after taking off from the city of Medan, killing at least 135 people.

14.1.15                    Charlie Hebdo shooting, Paris. ISIS gunmen.

17.7.15                 Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 Flight MH17 crashed after being hit by a Russian-made Buk missile over eastern Ukraine. Russian-backed separatists blamed

8.3.14                        Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370/MAS370) disappears over S China sea. Cause remains unknown. Blamed on pilots initially.

In virtually every one of these the official explanations do not add up in one form or another.


For a world-wide list of allegedly ISIS attacks or those claimed by them see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_linked_to_ISIL

Also: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/

Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_airliner_bombing_attacks

Distinguishing Between the Genuine and Fake

We have become somewhat used to catastrophic aeroplane accidents in recent years, circumstances that range through relatively straightforward mechanical or human errors, through 'terrorist' events, to those that rather bizarrely, defy all reasonable explanation.

Where a logical or truthful explanation is not forthcoming, it provides the opportunity for more 'exotic' ones, including intentional acts by governments in pursuit of some political or military objective. 

Despite all the 'fog and mirrors' that surround such events, one thing you can be sure of, the culprits are unlikely to admit responsibility and where they do, no one can be sure if it can be relied upon or that it reflects the true perpetrator. Since 9/11 at least we have all learned to be highly sceptical and suspicious of official explanations of tragic events. That may be the only good thing to come out of it.

The problem is distinguishing between the 'genuine' terrorist event, organised and perpetrated by disaffected individuals or groups independent of government and those carried out by government agencies to be blamed on the named terrorist group - currently most commonly 'ISIS'. The fact that in large measure ISIS is a front organisation for western interests, set up, financed, encouraged and controlled by the west and its allies in the Middle East, of course takes us full circle in a very murky, discreditable business. By and large, it is nation states with the technical expertise, the trained men, the munitions, to carry out these sophisticated operations, including the propaganda to sell the approved version, rather than disorganised and virtually illiterate individuals and groups.

An unusual feature in several of these aircraft incidents, is the erratic or hard to explain events that happen immediately before the crash. First gaining altitude before precipitous loss of same. Also the common loss of communication and lack of emergency procedures. In the case of MH370 a sudden increase in altitude followed by a very untypical maneuver. In the case of MH17 a very unconvincing explanation for the crash. In the GermanWings case an increase in altitude before setting the autopilot (why autopilot?) to a crash trajectory. Then even more strangely ineffective attempts to pull up using the joystick? Questions as to cause in the Russian Airbus A321 crash suspiciously close to an Israeli communications base. Now with the EgyptAir crash reports of erratic flight-path movements before falling from 38,000 ft.

Remote Control of Aircraft Systems

Those investigating the causes of crashes or incidents have a difficult job especially when wreckage has to be retrieved (if it can be located) from the oceans. But since the beginning of the 21st Century, and particularly the events of 9/11, the potential for remote control of aircraft systems can never be ruled out, nor covert action by those with the technical capability, to be blamed on those not responsible, or acting covertly for the very agencies that blame them! We shall have to wait and see whether this latest example fits the mould. Egypt and its economy, largely dependant on tourism, and playing into the hands of an Israeli/Saudi connection, certainly appears to be a target at the moment. Nor can Paris, target of two major terrorist incidents, be forgotten. If the cause of the crash was an explosive device, the question of airport security and who is/was responsible for it (a major issue in the Brussels Airport incident) when Paris was on a heightened terrorist security alert, must be a big issue.

The Environmental and Social Implications of Air Travel

The world is now, for the first time in human history, subject to continuous aircraft activity, allowing people to travel from one place to another as never before, but not without some very serious consequences to the atmosphere, land and sea. Atmospheric pollution, noise and development all result. Some of the issues have been brought into sharp focus in the matter of the controversial third runway at London's Heathrow airport, held up by excessive NOX (oxides of nitrogen) and other pollutants but replicated in cities around the world where planes land and take off.

The contamination of the atmosphere in the form of 'chemtrails', either from the products of fuel combustion or active 'seeding' with chemicals to affect weather patterns, not to mention the matter of fuel dumping or even the part aircraft play in the delivery of explosives in warfare, are all hot topics with which we cannot afford to be complacent. All talk is about CO2 which conveniently detracts and distracts from these issues, that see no sign of anything but getting worse before they get better.

Aircraft Crashes Recorded

The complex nature of the subject is best illustrated by reference to visual representation and facts here: http://aviation.globalincidentmap.com/. You will see that in May so far this year, no less than fifty four crash or emergency landing incidents are recorded, most of which get cursory or no mention on global news channels. Only the incidents involving a large loss of life or notable personages, tend to get wide publicity. Of course the whole issue of how 'news stories' are covered or not covered, is a subject in itself. Nor should we be naive enough to rule out the possibility that government may have had a big hand in manipulating it. Indeed I believe this should be the first question to be posed when blanket coverage is given to an incident and its stated cause.

So we should first establish the fact that there are indeed thousands of potentially dangerous incidents happening all the time and that these seldom get high profile attention from the media. Even the stories of large scale tragedies quickly become 'old news' and pass into history. Government through its accident investigation agencies tend to control the narrative and few challenge it. In this way false information can be promulgated and perpetuated. The incidents listed above and below may be exceptional and unrepresentative of a much bigger topic of air accidents but they have been chosen precisely for this reason and to illustrate the way they have been used for a particular political purpose.

Germanwings Flight 9525 crash 

The Mail has this:

"A new twist in the tragic saga of the doomed Germanwings plane - which crashed with the loss of 150 lives in the French Alps in March - indicates killer pilot Andreas Lubitz may have tried to save the aircraft at the last minute.

Just 93 seconds before the Airbus jetliner slammed into the mountainside the black box flight recorders showed Lubitz, 27, apparently trying to override the automatic descent mechanism which he triggered when captain Patrick Sondenheimer left the cockpit to use the toilet.

Lubitz, plagued by depression and suicidal thoughts, locked the captain out of the flight deck so he could put his suicide plan into play.

But, according to French air safety investigators who released a 29-page interim report on Wednesday about the crash based on black box data of the doomed Germanwings Flight 4U9525, there is evidence that he tried to manually take charge of the aircraft again shortly before the crash."
This data shows that there was a movement of the sidestick of the Airbus A-320. In the log it says 'between 10:39:33 and 10:40:07 there was a recorded sidestick input (manual movement) with low amplitude (vibrations) on the co-pilot side.'

In the 'conclusions' of the report this is summed up: 'One minute and 33 seconds before impact the FDR (flight data recorder) recorded a control input of 30 seconds on the right side stick controller, who was not strong enough to turn off the autopilot.'

Prof. Elmar Giemulla, a lawyer for victims and an expert on air travel law, told German newspaper Bild that 'we will never know what moved him in these seconds'. She added that a 'stronger pressure on the side stick' would have automatically disabled the autopilot."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3071932/Germanwings-pilot-tried-avoid-Alps-crash-minute.html#ixzz487DqyPZw




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanwings_Flight_9525

31st October, 2015.  Russian Airbus A321, KGL9628 flying from Sharm el-Sheikh to Moscow crashes over Sinai.

Operated by the Russian airline Kogalymavia. Owned and leased from Irish company. Assembled Germany 1997.  Took off from Sharm el-Sheikh airport at 05:58 (03:58 GMT) on 31 October, 2015. At 06:14 Egyptian time (04:14 GMT), the plane failed to make scheduled contact with air traffic control based in Larnaca, Cyprus. The plane disappeared from radar screens six minutes later while flying over central Sinai. Egyptian authorities said no SOS calls were received by air traffic controllers. All on board (224) killed. 

Islamic State (IS) affiliate, known as 'Sinai Province' take responsibility for bringing down plane. In this article (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25882504) the BBC portrays the group as a terrorist group with parallel aims and philosophy to ISIS, including the creation of sophisticated propaganda film, having carried out more than 31 attacks in 2016 alone. It does not answer the question who funds and controls it, or why in this arid vast space the alleged 'training camps', cannot be located and 'neutralised' by either Israel or Egyptian military if so desired. 

Without any substantiation of any link, Egyptian efforts to isolate Gaza are highlighted, as if Gaza didn't have enough problems already!  The suspicion must lurk that just like ISIS, Sinai Province it is a front for and construct of, American/Israeli/Saudi policy. At a most basic level, what advantage could there be for Arab 'freedom fighters' to further inflame a major power like Russia, that could only add to its woes?

The following is taken from Christopher Bollyn's web page here: 

http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15282

The Russian aircraft went down south of Al Arish, near the border of Israel, very close to Israel's main cyber warfare and computer hacking facility, Unit 8200, located on Kibbutz Urim. Cyber warfare is defined as "actions by a nation-state to penetrate another nation's computers or networks for the purposes of causing damage or disruption." Graphic: The Telegraph.

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT 8200 - Israel's main satellite signal intelligence facility is located on Kibbutz Urim, less than 60 miles NNE of the location where the Russian plane went down. Unit 8200, an institution of computer hackers, is the largest branch of the IDF and is responsible for the military’s offensive cyber capabilities. The Telegraph reported in 2010, "The Negev desert based Unit 8200 has evolved from the signal intelligence arm of the Israeli military into a respected leader in high technology warfare."

- See more at: http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15282 http://www.bollyn.com/

Legal moves to seek 9/11 compensation from Iraq!!!! Quotes from other sources for information:

"Kreindler & Kreindler represented many of the 9/11 victims, both in the victim's compensation fund and in litigation against the security companies and airlines. The firm took a leading role in challenging, unsuccessfully, what it claimed was a de facto cap on payments in the VCF, based on the regulations and comments made by VCF Special Master Kenneth Feinberg. The firm also brought litigation against the terrorists and individuals and entities it claimed were terrorist sponsors. This included a lawsuit for several billion dollars against Iraq, based on an allegation that Iraqi officials were aware of plans to attack America." From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreindler_%26_Kreindler

 "Kreindler & Kreindler Law Firm is a Cynical CIA Psyop Tool" - I originally posted this data in 2006. My motto: "The cover-up proves the crime." K&K is on intimate terms with the CIA, and has been central to covering up a score of covert ops/mass murders. K&K was also, as documented, instrumental in selling the American public on the Iraq War with a psychological operation falsely linking Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and the A-Bomb. Fox News: " ... Kreindler & Kreindler, a Park Ave. law firm that has been working overtime to establish a money trail leading from Saddam Inc.’s amassed loot to al-Qaeda’s coffers. ... " Yes, it's that kind of law firm ... Jim Kreindler on 9/11: "Immediately I suspected a terrorist attack and I found myself thinking about another terrorist event that dominated the attention of our law firm since 1988 – the bombing of Pan Am 103 by operatives

of the Libyan government. ... " Sure-sure ... From: http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/flight-3407-kreindler-kreindler-cons.html

"For example, while representing 9/11 victims, New York’s Kreindler & Kreindler law firm filed a Freedom of Information request for a copy of a May 2000 memo about a meeting OFAC officials had with two of Osama bin Laden’s half-brothers, as well as a subsequent letter about the meeting from the Saudi Binladin Group, the large construction conglomerate founded by Osama bin Laden’s father. Both documents are cited in the 9/11 Commission’s report."

OFAC denied the 2009 request saying, among other things, that the release of those records would constitute “a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,” presumably of the bin Ladens.

OFAC also asserted personal privacy and national security considerations in 2006 when refusing to release nearly 700 pages of records about the International Islamic Relief Organization, a Saudi charity whose branches in Indonesia and the Philippines were specially designated by OFAC as terrorist entities for funding al Qaeda." From: http://www.floridabulldog.org/2015/09/9-11-anniversary-secret-records-fbi-cia-terrorist-attacks/

"One June 28, 2013, WMR reported on another CIA base, the Pinal Air Park/Marana Airfield outside of Tucson, Arizona. It was this facility that drew the interest of retired Boeing 757 and 767 pilot, Iran-contra CIA contractor pilot, and 9/11 author Phil Marshall. In January 2013, the Calaveras County Sheriff’s Department concluded, after a botched investigation, that Marshall shot himself to death after having shot and killed his two teen-age children and the family dog. Pinal is the home to America’s “boneyard” of retired civilian aircraft, including Boeing passenger aircraft. Nearby Davis-Monthan Air Force Base is the home to the boneyard of retired military aircraft. In addition, the CIA and U.S. Special Forces maintain operations at Pinal, the CIA through its contractor, Evergreen International. A former CIA official who was involved in the CIA’s planning of the Iran-contra “arms-for-hostages; Iranian profits for the contras” operation confirmed that Evergreen had a close working relationship with the firm PTech, a firm with connections to the Saudi royal family and Israel’s Mossad and which had contracts to provide computer software support to the Department of Defense, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Justice, FBI, and the Secret Service from 1997 until 9/11. The firm continues to provide software support for classified U.S. military projects." From:  http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/14079#sthash.7iIqikYL.dpuf

"WMR has learned from a number of sources who are familiar with the operations of Moyock, Harvey Point, and Pinal that the three secret installations played a part in the planning and carrying out of the 9/11 attacks. Pinal provided the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft that were retrofitted to be flown remotely into the World Trade Center’s North and South Towers. WMR has not confirmed whether the Boeing 757 that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, was remotely-flown but there were no bodies spotted or recovered by the Somerset County coroner after the crash."  From: http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/14079

http://www.bollyn.com/