American woman stabbed to death in London.

A 19-year-old man is being held on suspicion of murder after a woman was killed and five others injured in a knife attack in central London at just before 10.30 pm on Wednesday 3rd August, 2016.

The immediate question: was this a "terrorist attack"? It comes only hours after a high-profile dramatic presentation by the Police Commissioner and Mayor of the introduction of more armed officers and sophisticated equipment including men on motor bikes for faster reaction times. (See: http://veaterecosan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/robo-cops-on-motor-bikes-hit-capital.html)

The man was Tasered by police and arrested following the incident, which left one of the victims lying in a “pool of blood” in Russell Square. Armed officers arrived on scene "within five minutes of receiving the first call."

The police reported that the dead woman in her sixties was treated at the scene but was pronounced dead a short time later. She was one of six people injured. There was a suggestion by a witness that they were Spanish. (It now turns out the deceased was American. (Other injured in the party of six included an Israeli national - BBC )

After being arrested and taken to hospital, the suspect who is ('Norwegian of Somali origin' - BBC) is now being held on suspicion of murder.

The Commissioner of Police has indicated that the motivation was less likely terrorism; more likely mental heath issues. However it is hard to overlook the way in which the story, with accompanying photographs has been projected by the media, nor the way it appears to fit with a number of similar attacks in France and Germany particularly.

• In 2015 knife crime was up by at least 18%, after years of falling. 
• Fifteen young people were stabbed to death in London in 2015. 
• Nationally, the number of knife crimes resulting in sentence or caution has fallen by a fraction, from 16,400 in the 12 months to March 2014 to 16,391 now. 
• The ONS said overall crime recorded by the police in 2015 rose by six per cent in the year to September, including a 27 per cent jump in violence against the person. 
• There were an extra 185,666 violent offences, bringing the annual total to more than 885,000 in England and Wales. 
• In 2015 knife-point rapes jumped 26 per cent to 341, while overall knife crime was up nine per cent, with 14,190 assaults involving a blade.

It is important to put this latest event in the context of the wider picture, with the obvious question, why do certain knife deaths get huge attention, whilst others are ignored? 

This is not a trivial matter, as we know how the media works. When the propaganda machine swings into action, we have cause to be concerned. 

It was the second most prominent story on BBC lunch-time news (after a reduction in the bank rate and before a consideration of 'internet addiction', the Brazil Olympics, report on S. Africa election, the future of 'HMS President' and Brighton's new 'pod') 

This my friend is the quality of our national news network!

Then there is the rather remarkable way in which this event and the way it has been communicated replicates those elsewhere. It raises the obvious question, are they in any way connected or coordinated? 

• Leytonstone Station, London. (5.12.2015) Somali-born Muhiddin Mire, 30, injured musician Lyle Zimmerman, 56, in the station's ticket hall. Zimmerman sustained a 'deep and ragged wound' to his neck. Mire claimed he was carrying out the attack for "my Syrian brothers". He had a history of mental illness and he believed he was being watched by the security services. He was tasered and arrested by police and last month found guilty of attempted murder at the Old Bailey. (Daniel Bielinski filmed events on his mobile phone.)
• Grafing, Nr Munich, Germany (10.5.2016) Twenty-seven year old German man kills one and injures others in knife attack. Said to have Shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the assault. Paul H. was mentally disturbed and stressed that he had no known links to Islamist militant groups. Arrested by police. 
• Wurzburg, Germany, (19.7.2016) Seventeen year old ......... is alleged to have carried out a knife and axe attack on a train injuring several passengers, before being shot dead by police. Shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the assault. He was said to be of Afghan backgound but this and his age subsequently disputed. IS connection claimed. 
• RAF Marham, England (20.7.2016) An RAF serviceman, who was not wearing his uniform, was out jogging in the afternoon on 20 July when two men grabbed him by the wrist, threatened him with a knife and tried to pull him towards a dark coloured people-carrier. The pair are described as of Middle Eastern origin in appearance and each was aged between 20 and 30. 
• Munich Shooting (22.7.2016) 18-year-old David Sonboly shoots dead 9 and injures 36 others. Sonboly died nearby (actually a Km away!) from an alleged self inflicted gunshot wound to the head "in front of two police officers". He was German-Iranian and been in psychiatric care, where he was treated for depression. An early witness talking to CNN correspondent on the phone claimed that the gunman had shouted, 'Allahu Akbar!' She was only identified as 'Lauretta', her story has never been substantiated, and she appears to have disappeared off the scene. 
• Ansbach, Germany (24.7.2016) Suicide bomber, Mohammad Daleel, a 27-year-old Syrian, kills himself outside wine bar injuring fifteen. Later revealed had fought against Assad regime and been terribly tortured twice. Had recently been denied permission to remain in Germany. (See: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ansbach-explosion-germany-isis-suicide-bomber-mohammed-daleel-al-qaeda-a7157961.html) This was the first such case on German soil. (See new comment at foot of article)
• Reutlingen in southwest Germany. (24.7.2016) 21-year-old male refugee from Syria stabs a woman dead and injures others. Arrested by police. German-Iranian attacker having a history of mental illness, according to German officials. 
• St Etienne , France (26.7.2016) murder of priest during mass were allegedly 19-year-old Adel Kermiche and 19-year old Abdel Malik Petitjean. Shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the assault. Shot dead by police. 
• London, England (3.8.2016) Nineteen year old man (unnamed) stabs to death an American woman in Russel Square (scene of 7/7 terrorist attack) in a party of tourists. Mental health said to be a “substantial focus” of the investigation. 
• Aldershot, England (3.8.2016) Two men in a blue Renault Clio tried to abduct a soldier near the main Garrison Church, Aldershot at 8.30 am (as reported here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/aldershot-abduction-attempt-soldier-garrison-military-police-hampshire-a7169821.html) (Clearly this and afore-mention RAF Marham incident recall the Woolwich knife attack on the 22.5.2013)

QUESTION

Are these individuals acting out their violent tendancies randomly from personal undisclosed motives or are they actually following instructions? Is it significant that nationality, religion and mental state appear to be common factors?

This is not a fatuous question either. Only yesterday (3.8.2016) the Telegraph announced (here:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/03/uk-educated-isil-supergrass-claims-terror-group-planning-simulta/) the following: 

"A British-educated Isil supergrass has revealed how the terror group has planned simultaneous attacks in England, France and Germany but is struggling to recruit UK-based jihadis.

Harry Sarfo, who was born in Germany but grew up in the UK, told how he travelled to Syria to fight alongside Isil jihadists but was told to return to Europe in order to take part in terrorist attacks.

In an interview in the New York Times Sarfo, who is serving a prison sentence in Germany, said that Isil commanders want to organise “loads of attacks at the same time” in different European countries."

The question is, is this latest attack, within the context of all the others,  genuine, by a genuine Muslim political group, or is it an arms-length front for the America/Saudi/Israeli alliance; or indeed just a scare story to promote fear and enable western governments to further advance a regressive and repressive agenda of legal and policing measures? 

Time will no doubt tell.

JONATHAN BRADY/PA WIRE

"A police officer and sniffer dog outside King’s Cross St Pancras underground station in London, after a knife attack in Russell Square."  From: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/london-russell-square-killed-injured-attack_uk_57a2c6bae4b0ce4992490c06?utm_hp_ref=uk&

This one comes from a somewhat similar alleged stabbing incident in Reutlingen, Germany on ..... in which one female died also at the hands of an emotionally disturbed young man of 23 referred to above. The car in the picture was said to have intentionally collided (some reports stated 'drove over') the alleged assailant. Somewhat strangely there appears to be little or no obvious damage to the front of the car. The road appears to have been chalk marked to indicate its position, hopefully after it was parked. What I find somewhat interesting in this and the more recent photograph from Central London (did you notice?) something has amused the officers at the scene engaged in the murder enquiry. In both photographs officers are seen smiling. Perhaps in both they were sharing a private joke with the female officer concerned or even that they knew something we don't?

ADDENDUM - Ansbach

I have just watched the ITV report on the Ansbach suicide bombing here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWuP21Pdinc. Published on 26 Jul 2016 

"More about the Ansbach bomber and other images of terrorist attacks in Germany in recent days. Rohit Kahroo reports, with Tom Bradby in the studio." 

I have to say I watch these productions carefully and critically for signs of problems. I noticed Rohit Kahroo a graduate from Birmingham University, was appointed ITV's 'African Correspondent" five years ago and rather unusually it was jointly with US network NBC. 

He is now "the Security Editor for ITV News, concentrating on counter-terrorism and national security, both in the UK and abroad."  

Reading his brief profile here in connection with his promotion in 2011, in the Birmingham Mail (Here: http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/former-birmingham-student-rohit-kachroo-151166) was this: 

"Still only 28, he was diagnosed with the condition (Type 1 diabetes) three years ago. “I was driving towards Leicestershire to work on a story with the McCanns when I realised I couldn’t keep my eyes open for more than half a second,” he said. “So I stopped at a service station for a quick nap – and woke up hours later having missed that story." 

He was however the reporter for a McCann item according to ITV (here: http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist/ITN/2008/07/21/T21070841/?v=1) "LTN: CRIME: Madeleine McCann disappearance: parents no longer suspects 21 July 2008 Story ref: T21070841 Contains: 7 Clips Format: betamax" amounting in all to over two and three quarter hours. 

So to suggest he "missed the story" may not give a totally accurate picture. 

The intrigue surrounding the McCann story and involvement of departments of HM Government is well known and a bit of a red flag in relation to anything else. (See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yYwFnglhtw)

But in relation to the Ansbach bombing, the bit that interested me in particular was an interview with a stated "Witness", (at 1.13 m) a young woman in her late teens or early twenties, called Jana Vandenberg. She speaks with a pronounced American accent. In the exceedingly brief slot (it's obviously savagely edited nine (9) seconds in total!) she says: 

"... and then I remembered that my little sister was back inside so I ran back towards the entrance of the concert hall and I saw a man laying injured on the floor with blood on his face ..."

No information is given where she comes from, by whom she is employed (if she is), or why she and her younger sister were in Ansbach? Or indeed why she of all people was chosen as the "eye witness" and no others.

There are several elements to this that I find questionable. It is not clear how long after the incident the interview takes place but her utter composure and undisturbed - both mentally and sartorially - appearance is worrying. 

True she doesn't claim to have seen the man blow himself up but she claims to have witnessed the immediate after effects, and she was clearly desperately worried about her "little sister" who may have been a casualty. Having been concerned about her no mention is made of her again which seem rather strange.

So the man on the ground "with blood on his face": is she suggesting that was the bomber? That would certainly be the inference I got from it. If so the account is quite preposterous. He was I believe described as setting off a backpack bomb filled with bolts and such like. Do you really think that a bloodied face would adequately describe the carnarge such a device would produce?

But perhaps she was instead describing one of the fifteen injured? If so why not a mention of them or more importantly the impact the bomber himself made on her? In no way is this a credible witness report. 

The question arises, was she in fact scripted or indeed what has come to be known as a "crisis actor" purely for the emotional impact on, and link to, the United States audience?

Searching the name on the internet provided only this at http://independent.academia.edu/JanaVandenberg which does look remarkably like the person being interviewed in the ITV footage. This young lady of identical name has this against it surprisingly: 

• Cold War8,223 People
• Korean War3,128 People
• Impact of the Korean War879 People
• International Relations1,089,429 People
• Political Science603,556 People

I have now discovered the same footage, but more of it - forty (40) seconds this time - put out by NBC. (Note the Rohit Kahroo joint arrangement with NBC above that looks as if it might still be in operation) This clip is self standing at http://www.nbcnews.com/video/u-s-teenager-witnessed-ansbach-suicide-bomb-attack-731807811513 and provides a little bit more information. We learn she is sixteen: "16-year-old Jana Vandenberg was taking an ice cream break from a music festival when she heard the explosion in Ansbach, Germany". (Her white T-shirt has 'California' embroidered on it.) Actually she doesn't say they were having an icecream but rather that "they ran in the opposite direction towards the icecream stall". Had she actually left her little sister alone inside the hall and why did it take time before she remembered her? 

"There was security people everywhere," she says. This we must presume was within minutes or seconds even, of the explosion itself. No one explains how or why they were there so quickly. The man we learn who had "blood on his face " was an "elderly gentleman" but she doesn't stop to help him or any of the other injured apparently or take notice of the man who has just blown himself up! This is quite incredible.

She says she was, "able to push through inside the concert screaming for her sister. They were hiding in the bathroom , really scared. I said we' re running now and we got out and ran all the way down town. As we ran cop cars were coming the other way. There was a very quick reaction."

So again we have the familiar element of these incident narratives "holed up in a bathroom very scared". But it begs the question doesn't it, how if she got to the scene so quickly, ignoring all the mayhem around her, and unobstructed by all the security people she says were there, and able to get back inside (she says "pushed through") yet within minutes not only has her little sister hidden in the bathroom, but she is able to locate her there and still be out and running away whilst "cop cars" are still arriving.

I would say there is something very wrong with this account. Yet again the television companies (in this case ITV and NBC) are either very gullible or knowingly agree to broadcast a very questionable source.

Robo-Cops on Motor Bikes Hit the Capital.

Rather strangely images of them assembled in a police yard 'somewhere in London' are hard to locate. This one from the Express Newspaper will have to do.



Getty/Sky http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/696095/met-police-armed-motorbike-police

From: http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/police-announce-extra-600-firearms-officers-on-london-s-streets-to-fight-terrorism-threat/story-29579340-detail/story.html

"Hundreds more firearms officers will be deployed on London's streets to help combat the threat of terrorism, it has been announced today (Wednesday). Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, made the pledge alongside Mayor of London Sadiq Khan.

The strategy, titled Operation Hercules, will see 600 additional firearms officers deployed in visible roles in the capital. The first are now fully trained and operationally ready.

Commissioner, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, said: "Anyone who's been following events in Europe over the past few weeks will understand why we want to show our determination to protect the public. We are deadly serious about the protection that we are offering the people of London and we will never be complacent."

"Despite the fact they are carrying guns they are still police officers and I want the public to approach and talk to them, they are out on our streets to reassure and help the public," he said.

Sadiq Khan said, ""We will see more armed officers on our streets, but there is no reason to be alarmed. All of our police officers are playing their part and working closely with all of our communities to prevent the possibility of an attack."

Read more at http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/police-announce-extra-600-firearms-officers-on-london-s-streets-to-fight-terrorism-threat/story-29579340-detail/story.html#dT3erdMvVy42bWwG.99

Another step towards a military police state, the objective of the Zionists, all or most based on the risk of manufactured and fraudulent 'terrorist events'.

The Guardian repeats the now disproved myth of the four Muslim terrorist bombers on 7th July, 2005. Subsequently private investigators - not the police - proved that it was impossible they were on the tube trains, as their connecting trains from Luton did not run! I have demonstrated similar inconsistencies and anomalies to ALL of the French murderous events PLUS invariably links to Israel or Israeli assets!

Yet it is these very suspect events that are used to ratchet up the hype and fear to support a militarised police force. This you note is common to virtually all westernised country as if they were all imitating an invisible template. Is it because they are?

"London was hit by coordinated suicide bombings on 7 July 2005, when four Islamist extremists targeted three underground trains and one bus, killing 52 people.

Since then, numerous plots have been foiled and there have been smaller-scale attacks, such as the killing of an off-duty soldier on a street in south London by two extremists in May 2013." https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/aug/03/met-deploys-600-extra-armed-police-in-london-to-counter-terror-threat

Armed-police-backed vehicle checks? Where is the justification for this? Where is the proportionality? Why do policemen need to wear masks? Where was the consultation? Where is the debate? Is this not turning mainland Britain into IRA Britain - but worse - on a total fabrication?

See how 'false flags' are used to pursue policy objectives and how powerful they are at shaping the public consciousness? This is all presented as 'kit' for 'public reassurance'. Well it doesn't reassure me!

See also: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/revealed-the-new-face-of-antiterror-policing-in-london-a3310691.html

In a CNN report here: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/31/europe/uk-met-police-commissioner-terror-attack-comments/index.html

The Police Commissioner states his opinion that a terror attack in London is "not if but when", so that's very 'reassuring' - not.

"(CNN)London's top police officer warns that the risk of a terror attack in the United Kingdom is a case of "when, not if."

In light of the recent wave of worldwide terror attacks, Met Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe said on the police's official blog Sunday he believes the threat from terrorism is very real and expresses "a greater sense of fear that Britain will be the next victim."

In the event of a terrorist attack, he wrote, the police advise the public to "Run, Hide, Tell."

He elaborated on this guidance in comments to the London Evening Standard newspaper.

"It may seem blindingly obvious, but some people don't run, they will duck down where they are, do all sorts of different things in the panic," he said.

"So let's be really clear -- run as far away as possible and when you can't run any further, hide, and then tell -- call the police because we've got the people, the resources, the firearms to deal with it," he told the paper. "It's very straightforward.""

This advice is just about as relevant and helpful as what we were told to do in the case of a nuclear attack in the 'cold war'. He just repeats what is the instinctive human 'fight or flight' reaction to any obviously dangerous scenario, embedded hundreds of thousands of years ago, and common to all sentient beings. 

Not only are we being misled about terrorist events, the threat of them and where they emanate, but this is all part of a very warped world view, promulgated by virtually all media outlets: that we are being uniquely targeted; that the threat is a Muslim one; that we have nothing to do with its creation; that it necessitates a revolution in policing methods and mind-set. 

The New Stateman has this in an article by Maria Norris here: http://www.newstatesman.com/world/2016/07/erdogan-s-purge-was-too-big-and-too-organised-be-mere-reaction-failed-coup

"Unfortunately, most of the official responses to terrorist attacks reinforces this belief about two civilisations clashing. This is evident not only in military responses like Hollande’s, but in the way we in the West respond to terrorist atrocities that happen in the Muslim world.

For example, fewer than ten days ago, IS attacked Baghdad, with a suicide bomber killing 250 people. On 5 July, IS attacked three sites in Saudi Arabia, including the Prophet’s Mosque in Medina. In May, IS killed 40 people in Yemen as they stood in line to enlist for national military service. IS kills countless people every day in Syria. These attacks have been met with mostly silence in the West. Social media tributes and hashtags have been scarce. The fact that ISIS kills more Muslims than non-Muslims is rarely explored. This is an example of a divisive boundary at work, where lives have different values depending on their geographical location."

In reality these 'terrorist events' have been created on European soil, by deep state agencies, specifically to promote the ends stated. They are closely alligned to the situation in the Middle East and the objectives of Israel. How else can you explain consistent and unique links in virtually all terrorist events as follows:

Paris Hebdo: video of shooting by Jewish man.

Paris Bataclan: owners sell and move to Israel immediately before

Brussels Airport: Security by Jewish firm. Video of escaping crowds Jewish journalist in place prepared.

Nice: German journalist married to prominent Israeli in place to capture video of lorry half way on its journey unchallenged by police.

Munich: Same two Israel-connected journalists in place and reporting the moment it kicks off.

St Etienne: ISIS statement accepting responsibility issued the day before (!) picked up by an American, Jewish-controlled channel 'monitoring' ISIS output yet not international security agencies including the French ('apparently').

These are in addition to all the Israel links to 9/11 and 7/7 now widely circulated and well known. Can there now be any doubt that Israel and its terrorist agency Mossad, is deeply implicated in these events - at the very least having proven foreknowledge of them? How otherwise is it able to have its assets in place, on site, in time to capture and disseminate the highly emotive and iconic (but probably staged) images?

Yet of course this in NEVER discussed in the media. As with 9/11 and 7/7, the events could not take place without the active participation of secret units within government itself. That these tactics exist within the British State has been proved by revelations from Northern Ireland. Nor are we reassured by the actions of armed police in France and America, where shooting dead rather than arrest appears to have become the norm, whether the circumstances require it or not.

The Commissioner states, that "still only 10% of the Met Police are armed". By my reckoning that is about 3000 roaming around with guns, and a new mind-set that they are at war with the population. As with tasers, the more they are supplied, the more their use will be considered 'essential'. With so many armed are we to see them deployed to domestic incidents, drunkenness and protest marches?

Surely we need to make a clear distinction between 'terrorist events' and traditional crime and not use the one as an excuse for a different approach to the other? That it would be much better if we used the armed forces in real cases of terrorism - as we did with Iranian Embassy siege - when necessary, rather than change the whole ethos and methodology of British policing? A few armed and highly trained units, strategically located, on permanent stand-by with helicopter provision would surely be more effective and proportionate for the REAL 'Mumbai-2008' thing, should it occur?

For further information on the very dubious nature of many of the recent 'terrorist attacks' in European cities, just use the placename in the search box top, right of the page.

"Evil Israel"


























http://www.flags.net/images/largeflags/ISRA0001.GIF

"Israel may not be Nazi, nor even a fascist state. Yet it is a member of the same terrible family, the family of evil states. Just consider these acts of evil perpetrated by the state."

Reproduced from: https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2016/08/01/stop-living-in-denial-israel-is-an-evil-state/#more-149356

"Ed. Note: As I have said before – I like Gideon Levy’s work. He is reasonable, fair, and does not seem to suffer from the same narcissistic psychosis that seems to attend every individual who has grown up in the sewer of Judaic culture.

Nevertheless, despite his very accurate, brave, and honest statement concerning Israel being an ‘evil’ state, he does not complete the picture. 

He lists the symptoms of the disease, but does not give an accurate diagnosis as to what the source of the sickness is, which is Judaism itself, which has functioned as a wellspring of evil, disease, and mental illness now for thousands of years, long before Israel was ever a ‘state’." 

By Gideon Levy, Haaretz.

After we’ve cited nationalism and racism, hatred and contempt for Arab life, the security cult and resistance to the occupation, victimhood and messianism, one more element must be added without which the behavior of the Israeli occupation regime cannot be explained: Evil. Pure evil. Sadistic evil. Evil for its own sake. Sometimes, it’s the only explanation.

Eva Illouz described its signs (“Evil now,” Haaretz Hebrew edition, July 30). Her essay, which challenges the idea of the banality of evil, considers the national group as the source of the evil. Using philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein’s concept, she finds a “family resemblance” between the Israeli occupation and history’s evil regimes. This similarity does not mean that Israel is Nazi, nor even fascist. And yet it is a member of the same terrible family, the family of evil states. It’s a depressing and brilliant analysis.

The evil that Illouz attributes to Israel is not banal, it cannot happen anywhere, and it has political and social roots that are deeply embedded in Israeli society. Thus, Illouz joins Zeev Sternhell, who warned in his impressive and resounding essay about the cultural soil out of which fascism is now growing in Israel (“The birth of fascism,” Haaretz Hebrew edition, July 7).

But alongside these analyses, we must also present a brief history of evil. We must present the instances that combine to create a great and horrific picture, a picture of Israeli evil in the territories, so as to stand up to those who deny the evil. It is not the case of the individual – Sgt. Elor Azaria, for example, who is being tried for the death of a subdued Palestinian assailant in Hebron – but the conduct of the establishment and the occupation regime that proves the evil. In fact, the continuation of the occupation proves the evil. Illouz, Sternhell and others provide debatable analyses on its origins, but whatever they are, it can no longer be denied.

One case is like a thousand witnesses: the case of Bilal Kayed. A young man who completed a prison term of 14.5 years – his entire sentence – without a single furlough, without being allowed to at least say goodbye by phone to his dying father; a clear sign of evil.

http://www.jewishexponent.com/sites/default/files/article/main_image/F140614KBG01.JPG

"Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (fourth from right), Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon (third from right), Chief of the Shin Bet Intelligence Yoram Cohen and Director of the Mossad, Tamir Pardo (far right) at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, to discuss the disappearance of three Jewish teenagers near Hebron, in the West Bank. 

Photo by Kobi Gideon/GPO/Flash90."

About six weeks ago, Kayed was getting ready for his release. A representative of the Shin Bet security service – one of the greatest agencies of evil in Israel – even showed him a photograph of the home his family had built for him to stir him up even more ahead of his release. And then, as his family waited impatiently for him at the crossing point and Kayed grew ever more excited in his cell, he was informed that he was being thrown into administrative detention for at least another six months, without trial and without explanation.

Since then, he has been on hunger strike. He is cuffed to his bed. His family is not allowed to see him. Prison guards never leave his room and the lights are not turned out for a moment. Evil.

Only evil can explain the state’s conduct toward Kayed – only an evil state acts this way. The arbitrary announcement, at the last moment, of a senseless detention is abuse, and the way he has been treated since then is also abuse.

Only evil can explain the detention last week of another young man, Hiran Jaradat, whose brother Arif (who had Down syndrome) was killed in June and whose father died two days ago. He is under arrest for “incitement on Facebook” and was not released to attend his father’s funeral. Evil.

The continuation of the detention of poet Darin Tatur – evil. The destruction of the tiny swimming pool that the residents of Khirbet Tana in the northern West Bank had built for themselves – evil. The confiscation of water tanks from a community of shepherds in the Jordan Valley in the July heat – evil.

A great many of the decisions of the occupation regime that decides the fates of individuals, families, communities, villages and cities cannot be explained without evil. The list is as long as the occupation. The extortion of sick people from Gaza to enlist them as collaborators, the blockades on cities and towns for weeks, the Gaza blockade, the demolition of homes – all evil.

Banal or not, its existence must be acknowledged and it must be recognized as one of the most influential values in Israel. Yes, there is an evil regime at work in Israel, and therefore it is an evil state."

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/4f/f4/dc/4ff4dc21a321238f0f81e44686f84d7a.jpg

THE 'HAMPSTEAD TWO'. CHILDREN UNBELIEVED AND FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM THEIR MOTHER BY A CARELESS BRITISH STATE, STILL PREPARED TO COVER UP CHILD ABUSE OF THE WORST KIND


https://regmedia.co.uk/2013/11/14/old_bailey_lady_justice_big.jpg?x=648&y=348&crop=1

THE REALITY OF 'BRITISH JUSTICE' IN ACTION. AN ACID TEST.

REPRODUCED FROM 

Anonymous #OpHampstead by

George Antoniou at Hampstead, Finchley, London, England.

July 24 at 2:16pm · London · 

"ALISA AND GABRIEL - THE BRAVEST I HAVE EVER HEARD OF UNCOVERING THE HAMPSTEAD CHILD RAPE & MURDER ATTEMPTED COVER UP.

Did you know the mother and her children could have safely escaped? Did you know that they decided to stop this child abuse and protect the other children so they went to the police on 4th Sep 2014 and gave them all the evidence so, they could investigate?

Did you know the children alleged that they were abused at schools, homes of teachers and at Christchurch Primary in Hampstead?

Did you know they said the abusers had distinguishing marks and TATTOOS on or around the genital area? They described and drew a few and included birth marks and nick names of the abusers such as "Shepherds bush" due to the particular woman abuser, Vanessa Fitzpatrick having extraordinarily hairy private parts. POLICE DID NOT SEARCH OR CHECK ANY ABUSER FOR SUCH MARKS.

Did you know they described the sexual abuse they were subjected to in great detail and graphics that even Dr Hodes, a leading paediatrician consultant with over 20 years experience and other professionals agreed that no one could provide such detail unless they had been sexually abused? THE POLICE DID NOT ARREST A SINGLE SUSPECT.

They described being forced to sniff cocaine, sacrifice babies by slitting their throat and then holding them up right so that the blood drains out. They then said they drank the blood and they and the abusers danced in the church with the baby skulls around their necks? They said this also happened at Christ Church. NO CRIME SCENE FORENSICALLY
EXAMINED.

They said some of the abusers, giving names and place of work, had secret doors in wardrobes in their homes leading to a secret room where the abuse also occurred? Did you know they said their father was the leader of the cult and kept baby skulls and plastic
willies that he makes In his shed in his home? NO HOME ADDRESS OF ANY
ABUSER WAS VISITED LET ALONE SEARCHED.

Did you know no computer, laptop or mobile phone belonging to an abuser was seized? NO ONE WAS ARRESTED.

Did you know that between 15th and 22nd Sep 2014 DR Hodes, instructed by the police, produced 3 written reports after two physical examinations of the children and confirmed throughout that the injuries to the anuses to the children were consistent with the allegations of sexual abuse as described by the children? NO ONE ARRESTED

Did you know that the father was invited to the police station for an interview on 15 Sep 2014? The police only asked him 3 questions similar to did you stick something in your sons bottom at Finchley swimming pool in 2013? He was asked nothing else. What he was asked was also a fabricated version of events as the children said that they were abused
by many abusers at Finchley swimming pool around 2011. The father was not even asked about the other abusers involved or the cult.

Did you know the father was interviewed by Victoria Derbyshire, half hour slot was allocated to this cause and aired on BBC in April 2015?

Did you know he lied and said that the police asked him questions about being the leader of a 100 plus satanic cult including members of schools, police social services, church and other walks of professional life? He said that the police asked him about the sexual abuse suffered by his children by the cult including the murder and cannibalism of babies?
Remember he was asked only 3 similar questions to did he insert something or anything in the boys bottom? NO PUBLIC AUTHORITY WISHES TO CORRECT THIS MISREPRESENTATION TO THE PUBLIC.

In fact Justice Ryder at the appeal hearing in Aug 2015 said he can think of many reasons why someone would lie on TV so it does not mean the father sexually abuses children. POINT DISMISSED. THAT WAS THE END OF THAT.

Did you know, ex Detective Constable Kylie Wilson confirmed in two reports that the police failed to investigate the children's claims and mishandled the ABE interviews of the children with leading questions by the interviewing officer which encouraged the "retractions" which were hurriedly obtained after the children were taken into care away from the mother on 11 Sep 2014? The Father was due contact with the children on
13th Sept. 2014 and the inconsistent and strange "retractions" of the allegations took place on the 17th Sep. Case closed 22nd Sept 2014. REPORTS IGNORED.

Did you know at the fact finding hearing before Justice Pauffley in March 2015 Dr. Hodes maintained her findings and said the allegations made by the children needed to be taken very seriously. SHE WAS AGAIN, IGNORED

Did you know Justice Pauffley's judgement does not consider the above failures of the police investigations and does not once mention the distinguishing marks and TATTOOS that the children alleged the abusers had?

Did you know Justice Pauffley in her judgement dated 19 March 2015 said that it was a curious fact that no police officer prior to the launch of the family proceedings had viewed / listened to the recordings of the children making the allegations of sexual abuse in graphic detail to police officer Yahirou on 4 Sep 2014? BÙT, police officer Yahirou had told
Justice Pauffley at the fact finding hearing when he gave evidence at court that two officers and a sergeant came to his house in the morning of 5th Sep 2014 and listened to the recordings in front of him before seizing them as evidence. In fact, the CRIS report shows other officers also listened to the recordings made by police officer Yahirou who said that the children had to be telling the truth due to the level of detail and description the children had given. WHAT ELSE HAS PAUFFLEY GOTTEN WRONG IN HER JUDGEMENT? WAS IT FACT FINDING OR FACT HIDING HEARING THAT TOOK PLACE IN MARCH 2015 AT THE HIGH COURT?

Did you know, there is an ongoing complaint lodged with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) into the failures of the police investigation into the allegations made by the children?

Did you know they upheld a previous complaint and confirmed that the police needed to answer the above questions (and more) relating to the investigation as their response was inadequate and designed to undermine the complaint made by the mother and her legal team?

Did you know the police recently responded in March 2016 and the report was produced by DCI Foulkes who was the same officer leading the investigation into the children's allegations in Sep 2014?

The police response exposes the cover up further, lacking objectivity and impartiality, as law says the complaint should be investigated by a independent person. Currently, a 99 page appeal is with the IPCC who are considering what to do as we speak.

DID YOU KNOW THAT JUSTICE AND TRUTH HAS PREVAILED?

CAN YOU HANDLE THE TRUTH?

DO YOU NOT WISH THAT THE POLICE AT LEAST INVESTIGATE THE CHILDREN'S
CLAIMS TO A PROPER STANDARD BEFORE THE COURTS CAN DISMISS THE CLAIMS AS
"BASELESS"?

DEMAND A PROPER POLICE INVESTIGATION

Did you know, Gabriel said that when he remembers what happened his vision goes blurry and he sees monsters and when he closes his eyes he sees his dad coming to kill him for speaking the truth?

Gabriel is 10 and Alisa 11 years old now.

The mother, Ella has not seen or spoken to her children since January 2015.

FREE THE CHILDREN. FREE YOURSELVES.

FREE THE HAMPSTEAD 2." END OF ARTICLE.