UPDATE. The father of the two children mentioned in this article has now been confirmed to have worked for LuvForHaiti, which is owned by Josiah Bruny, a man that has been linked to Pizzagate. Read more here:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1435605
Short summary of the Hampstead case (facts only with a minimum of names, you don't have to read it all just now, I just wanted to make sure that it was all saved in one place for future reference):
While on vacation in Morocco in August/September 2014, two siblings aged 8 and 9 from Hampstead, London revealed to their mother and her new partner that they along with 18 other children had been sexually and physically abused by their father and their teachers at school and in church. They described their father as the local leader of an international cult dealing in child trafficking, ritual murder and the production of child abuse material.
According to the children a coven of satanic families exists in Hampstead, often several families on the same street. They have infiltrated schools, churches, child protection services and the police. At least 5 primary schools have been compromised. At the two children’s own school 20 «special children» were taken out of class on Wednesdays to be kicked in the genitals and anally raped by teachers and others coming to school. The women raped the children with strap on dildos. The children who screamed the most were injected with sedatives and all children were bribed with sweets afterwards. Babies were sedated and flown in from foreign countries and ritually sacrificed in a secret room in the school and the meat and blood was consumed. The meat was often mixed into the school dinners. Ritual sacrifices also took place on Saturdays at church and the cult members and children danced around in costumes made out of human skulls and slippers made out of human skin. The two children had been forced to hold the knife while ritually murdering a baby. They were also taken to parties were they were introduced to drugs by their father. Hard to believe, but this what the children were disclosing to their mother, her new partner and the police.
Most notably regarding
#Pizzagate there was a link to a McDonalds restaurant, a Starbucks coffee shop and a Pizza Express. The children disclosed that employees at these three places were involved in child abuse and ritual sacrifice taking place inside these businesses.
When they got home from their vacation the mother and her partner reported this to the police, who then referred it to Scotland Yard. When the siblings were taken in to be interviewed the first time, they were happy to disclose their experiences and seemed to expect that these would be investigated.
The second time they were interviewed they were however taken into state custody on the grounds that the mother’s new partner had tortured them to make the allegations. The mother's new partner however was never interviewed by the police!
After having spent nearly a full week in the company of strangers the children in their third police interview retract some but not all of their allegations. The father was interviewed about some of the allegations two days prior to this.
An expert on child abuse examined the children and found conclusive evidence that they had been sexually abused. Then all of a sudden the case was closed citing no crime had occurred.
The mother and her new partner fought on in the family courts to have the children returned to them. They sacked their first legal team.
The mother narrowingly escaped out of a window and later out of the UK when a large group of police came asking for her.
The person who leaked the videos online then spearheaded a campaign that gathered 16000 signatures in support of the case before the campaign was deleted by the petition website Change.org because of a violation of a court order.
Peaceful demonstrations were held outside the church that were disrupted by two agent provocateurs that started shouting and harassing the church members before being arrested some weeks later.
One of the supporters created a blog that released 27 investigative videos with further speculations about the case based on the social media accounts of the alleged cult members before it was removed by the blog service Wordpress for violation of terms and guidelines.
http://www.hampsteadresearch.com
The videos are still online though:
http://tinyurl.com/hampsteadccpsvideos
This sock puppet account is one of many that are believed to have been set up solely to discredit the case and are believed to be one and the same person: the father. One supporter of the children made a blog about this:
https://dearmandoeshampstead.wordpress.com
The many trolls and sock puppets then set up a spoof blog of the investigative blog previously mentioned and for months and months, supporters and investigators were heavily trolled by the «people» surrounding the spoof blog.
The case was reported about in the mainstream media under these pretenses. The BBC airs a half hour long interview with the father who can be seen "crying" on camera.
Technical details about the leaked material:
In early February 2015 a series of video interview clips with two siblings, a boy aged 8 and a girl aged 9, emerged online where they detailed their experiences of being sexually and physically abused by their father, their teachers and other members of what appeared to be an international ritual abuse cult.
33 clips found their way online, 19 short home videos recorded while the children were on vacation in Morocco and right after they had returned to London, and 14 longer police interview videos recorded by the police after the crimes had been reported to Barnet Police Station.
How the material was leaked online:
Short story: A blogger picked it up after having been accidentally CC'ed in an email to the Home Secretary.
Long story: On 2 February, 2015 an email by Sabine McNeill was published on the "The Tap Blog" at the tapnewswire.com website that the editor Henry Curteis had received by mistake because he had inadvertently been CC’d in the list of recipients when Sabine was sending the email to Home Secretary Theresa May. He left out Sabine McNeill’s name in the email he published but included links to 19 video interview clips that he had uploaded to Youtube after downloading them from the Google Drive that Sabine McNeill had set up to share the videos with her fellow MacKenzie friends, and which she had also shared the link to in her email to Home Secretary Theresa May.
https://web.archive.org/web/20150205013813/http://tapnewswire.com/2015/02/courts-want-crime-kept-quiet-while-the-innocent-are-punished
At about the same time a document was uploaded by an unknown party to the anonymous textsharing service Pastebin that contained the testimony of the children's mother. The text appeared to be the mothers notes summarizing her children’s allegations along with names and addresses to the alleged cult members. Original link:
http://pastebin.com/TpbNgCVS(since deleted by unknown party but reuploaded to: https://www.zerobin.net/?5f64f96168dd5662#B6yEJCFcl9mCoNmyCUE+QMrma9y58C5BsKL46HWkhm0=)
The uploaded document borrowed parts of a text by the Anonymous operation "Operation Death Eaters" published no earlier than 27. Oct. 2014 and this copied part was pasted in before and after the text with the allegations to make it look like an "official" Anonymous document.
http://pastebin.com/1fjmHCnr
This leaked document was then published in full on the Veterans Today website on 22. february. On the same day the editor Gordon Duff claimed in the Facebook comments to the article that «There are file tags from MI5 embedded in the original doc«.
Detailed timeline:
05/2014 – Ms Draper’s credit card is compromised. One of the children admitted (August 2014) getting the card details and passing them to the father, who forced to do it by threatening them. The card was used to purchase air tickets and software on several occasions.
07/2014 – The children admitted stealing about £2,000 from the mother’s and Mr Christie’s purse, his iphone and antique silver bracelet (£2,000) following Mr Dearman’s threats and demands.
9/08–04/09/2014 – The children disclosed the sexual assaults and violence, committed by their father since their young age, his paedophile associates and a number of other abusers.
04/09/2014 – Private contact with Mr Christie’s brother in law Jean-Clement Yauhirou, police constable of Haringey police station, who took initial evidence, filmed the witnesses’ disclosure on his computer and made a note of the children’s drawings and diary pages.
05/09/2014 – Mr Yauhirou passed the information to the Child Abuse Investigation Team of Barnet Police station.
05/09/2014 – DS Johnathan DICKS, DS Cleo Papachristou visited home address of the victims.
05/09/2014 at 8pm – DC Steve Martin and DS Papachristou took initial recorded disclosure from the victims. DC Martin arranged with the family that a drive around would be completed on Monday, 8th September, to identify the properties where the assaults were committed.
08/09/2014 at 11am – Both victims were taken on a drive to identify possible addresses. One of the addresses was identified.
08/09/2014 - Initial strategy meeting held.
09/09/2014 – Strategy LADO meeting at Crowndale Centre, NW3 with Camden Social Services Department, chaired by Tina Bailey. It was agreed to take the children into protective custody.
10/09/2014 – Strategy LADO meeting with Camden Social Services. Second ABE interview was decided.
10/09/2014 – Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/09/2014 - Joint home visit with the police: ABE trained Social Worker Bethan Thomas.
11/09/2014 at 14:30 – Video interviews at Police station where the children give detailed accounts of sexual abuse, implicating some 60 adults who sexually abuse some 20 children and many more babies.
11/09/2014 at 14:30 – Significant Witness Interview with the mother. At 19.50 Police Protection Powers were used by Barnet Police to keep the children after their interview.
12/09/2014 – Hearing of Private Law Proceedings between father and mother in Family Court of High Holborn, with HHJ Gargan – used to ‘consolidate’ with Public Law Proceedings and granting the ICO. Transfer of Court Proceedings from LB Camden to LB Barnet, joining father Ricky Dearman as 2nd Respondent
12/09/2014 – LB Camden applied for and obtained an Emergency Protection Order.
12/09/2014 –Medical examinations of both children confirm the allegations of sexual abuse and violence. Dr Hodes says that the scars in the rectum area were caused by the insertion of plastic objects. She confirms that many injuries had occurred at least half a year to a year before the examination.
13/09/2014 at 11:23 – According to the CRIS report, another interview was completed which was consistent with the children’s previous accounts. However, no video evidence has been disclosed.
15/09/2014 – Interview of the children’s father Mr Dearman.
15/09/2014 - Strategy LADO meeting of Camden Social Services.
16/09/2014 - Application for Care and Interim Care Order, LB Camden
17/09/2014 – Further ABE interviews of the children where they withdraw their allegations, claiming that the details of their “made up” story had been taken from a film called “Mask of Zorro” (PG rating). They now make allegations against Mr Christie.
17/08/2014 - Case Management Hearing No 1 – Mother represented by solicitor, herself ill.
22/09/2014 – The case was closed by Barnet Police by DI Cannon with “no crime confirmed” status.
22/09/2014 – Review Strategy meeting: Barnet to present case and apply for Interim Care Order (ICO).
26/09/2014 - DI Fernandez of Barnet Police tells the mother that case is closed.
22/12/2014 - Judicial Review filed against Commissioner of Metropolitan Police to re-open the case.
1.12.2016
"Not only has this case not "gone away" but in its wake it has left a trail of further injustice and persecution designed to bury it. No action by the state, however perfidious, has been regarded as being unacceptable in the mission to deny the possibility that children of eight and nine could speak the truth and so condemn the actions of adults and the machinations of established institutions and neighbourhoods. Given the wider context, both here and in America particularly, though the examples are legion and international, only perversity and cover-up reaching up to the highest points of judiciary and government can explain the intentional blindness and cupidity. Those refusing to take the allegations seriously will always be irredeemably and indelibly stained with the charge that they failed to protect and defend vulnerable children when they were most in need - indeed to place them in greater danger, in order to protect instead shibboleths of person and position and to pursue by whatever draconian means was available, those that sought to represent their interests. They will for ever, in my mind at least, stand condemned of failing in the most basic duty of the law, to protect the weak and pursue the guilty. In so doing they have brought into disrepute the whole system, an edifice that both structurally and metaphorically, is crumbling in the face of the revelations before our very eyes. Eternal shame on those that did the wrong thing for the wrong reason, and all those that have subsequently refused to challenge what has been said and done."
