Like all qualified medical doctors who have told the truth about covid-19, Dr Vernon Coleman has been repeatedly lied about and libelled on the internet and in the mainstream media. In March 2020, after studying the covid death figures and comparing the death statistics in the UK to that of previous years, Dr Coleman said that the threat of covid-19 had been wildly exaggerated and that there was no pandemic. In that first video, he warned that the pandemic fraud (or hoax) would result in the deaths of many old people (which it did), the introduction of mandatory vaccinations (which appears to be happening) and the disappearance of cash (now a serious threat). As a result of his video, his Wikipedia page was deliberately and dramatically changed by government employees and used to 'monster' him. All his lifetime achievements were removed. Without any evidence or justification he was, among other things, labelled a 'conspiracy theorist' and said to be 'widely discredited'. Google, which works with Wikipedia, reproduced the lies in an attempt to discredit him, so that nobody would believe his warnings. Biographies on www.vernoncoleman.com include references.
Warnings, Forecasts and Predictions
Dr Vernon Coleman’s track record of spotting health dangers is second to none. Since the 1970s, when his first two ground breaking books (The Medicine Men and Paper Doctors) were published, Dr Coleman has been gaining friends among patients and enemies among doctors and drug companies.
In The Medicine Men (1975), Vernon Coleman drew attention to the dangerously close relationship between the medical establishment and the pharmaceutical industry. In Paper Doctors (1977) he argued that most medical research is done for the benefit of researchers (and drug companies) and that the money would be better spent on using the information we already have and encouraging the public to avoid known health hazards.
Vernon Coleman, a Sunday Times bestselling author, is one of the few medically qualified authors writing on medical matters without bias and without any professional or commercial commitments or allegiances.
His honesty has made him many enemies among the medical establishment and the establishment’s commercial alliances. His predictions, forecasts and warnings have often been made years (and, in many cases, decades) before anyone else has unearthed and understood the evidence or had the courage to speak out. In addition, in many of his medical books and thousands of newspaper and magazine articles he has drawn attention to the dangers of using specific over the counter and prescription drugs.
There are hundreds of other articles on health, politics and animal issues on www.vernoncoleman.com
See also:
How do we wean doctors (and the nation) off of drugs?
How do we wean doctors (and the nation) off of drugs?
A PROFESSION ADDICTED TO DRUGS?
It should come as no surprise, as in every other walk of life, scientific research and its findings, can be influenced by factors other than what is good for the patient! Doctors are addicted to drugs: sometimes for themselves but mainly for their patients. The economic success and profitability of pharmaceutical companies depends not on the health of the nation but on an increase in ill-heath and a multiplicity of diseases, for which ever more 'miracle' drugs are required.
We have to trust that prescribing is done in good faith and in the belief that it is in the best interests of the patient. In short, to use a phrase made popular in the Covid debacle, just "following the science". Unfortunately life is not quite that simple or straightforward. The financial performance of the pharmaceutical company may weigh more in the board room.
DRUG PUSHERS?
Doctors, and increasingly pharmacists, are the essential key to the chemical company profits. Many preparations can be obtained 'over the counter' but the more important and lucrative ones must be prescribed. This is why drug companies have historically paid great attention to GPs and other doctors, showering them with benefits in kind.
GP's in particular are subject to a 'pincer movement' of pressure from the companies that make the drugs with their often exaggerated claims and from the patient himself, seeking a cure from whatever condition he or she is suffering from. This creates a triangulation of interests, expectations and financial benefits that may in fact be illusionary and harmful.
PSYCHOLOGICAL DEPENDANCY?
The very idea of miracle pills and miracle medicine, blinds both patient and doctor to underlying causes, probably harder to address. In a situation where there is no cost implication to either prescriber or recipient - directly at least, because the cost is borne by the state and paid for out of general taxation - no disincentive operates.
This rather obviously, has both positive and negative consequences. Treatments are not circumscribed by the patient's ability to pay but nor is there any reason to question whether the drug is either cost-effective or even necessary.
GOVERNMENT RESERVATIONS
It would appear the government may be coming to the same opinion. England's most senior doctor, Prof. Sir Stephen Powis, NHS medical director, has recently stated that doctors must stop "doling out a pill for every ill, as it leaves millions of patients hooked on drugs they do not need."
He continued, "Figures suggest around 10% of prescriptions are not needed." This equates to nearly £1 billion to the national health! Even this figure underestimates the real figure, as it excludes the cost to individuals, either as their statutory contribution or that spent on drugs not requiring a prescription. Nor does it include the huge saving that would flow from healthier life styles, particularly as it relates to diet, exercise and obesity.
DRUG INDUCED ILLNESS
During 2021, 1.14 billion prescription items were dispensed by pharmacists in England - a 3 per cent rise on the previous year!More than eight million people take more than five pills per day. The total number taking chemical substances of one sort or another, either legal or illegal, is obviously much higher. Much of the NHS effort and budget is taken up dealing with the adverse effects of these with many thousands ending up in hospital as a direct result. Iatrogenic disease (i.e. conditions caused by medical interventions) constitute up to a fifth of hospital bed occupancy.
Among the European Union Member states, WHO concluded that the healthcare-related errors occur in 8% to 12% of hospitalizations. A report named “organisation of memory” estimated 850,000 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur in hospital each year. This figure does not include hospitalisations that result from reactions to chemicals taken or prescribed in the community, so those figures must understate the problem. Over one in five hospital admissions for the over 65's, result from adverse effects of medications costing the NHS at least £2 billion. A third of over 80's take eight or more medicines daily!
A DRUG FOR EVERY ILL
Let us look at just some of the categories of over-use and over-prescription by category, taken from government sources:
Anti-biotics
"Overall prescribing rates were 659, 654 and 607 per 1000 registered patients for 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. 27 Feb 2018".
Discovered by Fleming just before World War II, anti-biotics have undoubtedly saved millions of lives. However the dangers of over-prescribing them for conditions against which they were ineffective, such as viral colds, are well known. Misuse of these wonder drugs both in animals (to off-set battery conditions and aid growth) and in humans has allowed germs to develop resistance to them. Increasingly common anti-biotics are ineffective against bacterial infections. This could be catastrophic in a real pandemic which clearly Covid was not. Doctors are eventually reacting to this fact and prescribing less but the damage has already been done.
Anti-depressants
"Between April to June 2021, 20.5 million anti-depressant drugs were prescribed. This is a 2% increase from 20.2 million items in the previous quarter, and a 7% increase from 19.2 million items for the same quarter in 2020/21."
In other words over 80 million prescriptions in an adult population (over 18) of 54 million and on the increase year on year! Clearly a lot of people are diagnosed as suffering from depression. It points to a fundamental flaw in the nature of society, relationships and the human psyche.
But leaving that aside there is a big question mark over whether the popular anti-depressants work or at least work as well as their manufacturers claim. They may even have the opposite effect and make both depression and suicide more likely. The disastrous long-term addictive consequences of Benzodiazepines such as 'Librium', 'Valium' and many other proprietary names, known sweetly as 'Mummy's little helpers', are well known but it seems lessons have not been learned.
Practical measures to tackle the problem of depression which seems to be rife, such as changing life and work circumstances, talking therapies, friends, social activities, pets, exercise, diet and sleep, may be far more effective, but getting doctors to pursue these is still not generally applied. A pill seems to be a far more convenient option.
Dementia
"997,000 drugs for dementia prescribed, a 2% increase from 982,000 items in the previous quarter. The total cost of care for people living with dementia is typically £100,000, but can cost as much as £500,000. The cost of dementia to the UK is currently £34.7 billion a year, which works out as an average annual cost of £32,250 per person with dementia."
Mental decline is a likely consequences of aging but is not inevitable. Weakness of body does not necessarily entail weakness of mind. However the larger the proportion of older people in the population, the more prevalent it is likely to become. Once dementia sets in, the prospects are not good and it is understandable that doctors faced with it, will grasp at straws, as will the sufferers, as the above statistics prove.
But no one is really sure whether the cholinesterase inhibitors used (Donepezil (Aricept), Galantamine (Razadyne) and Rivastigmine (Exelon) are the most commonly used)are ultimately beneficial at slowing decline, improving memory or reducing associated psychosis. In large part they are still experimental. They certainly have significant adverse side effects across a range of psycho-motor areas. Sufferers are often persuaded ill advisedly, as to their efficacy, putting up with deterioration or pain in other areas as the necessary cost.
How much the misleading claims of drug companies raise unfounded expectations in doctors and patients is undetermined, but again no one really knows whether the huge cost to the NHS is really beneficial or effective.
Diabetes
"In 2020/21, there were 57.9 million drugs used in treating diabetes prescribed in England for a cost of £1.19 billion, 12.5% of the total spend on all prescription items prescribed in England. Some 7% of the UK population (4.9 million) are now living with diabetes; approximately one million people have undiagnosed type 2 diabetes, 40 000 children have diabetes and more than 3000 children are diagnosed every year."
The discovery of insulin and the role of the pancreas in the disease of diabetes were life savers for the many struck with the condition. The effective treatment did not stop the trend of increasing in the numbers suffering from it. The pre-disposing features are well known. They include family and genetic factors, but obesity and diet are hugely significant. Britain has changed its eating habits over the last fifty years towards fast foods and an essentially American-style diet, which also has a distinctive disease pattern. The average body shape has changed as a consequence and lower socio-economic groups are proportionately worse affected. Now "63% of UK adults (aged 18+) are overweight or obese (2018/19). This equates to an estimated 35 million overweight or obese UK adults."
It is clearly not in the interests of the fast food industry or the pharmaceutical industry to reduce diabetes, but it is in the interests of the public and government. The increase in diabetes has the potential to bankrupt the NHS and nation if not tackled. The question is whether doctors help or hinder that process?
Sleeping pills
"Last year, 15.3 million NHS prescriptions were made for sleep medication. Patients in England alone received 5.4m prescriptions for zopiclone and 2.8m for temazepam, the two most popular sleeping pills."
It is generally acknowledged that sleep, for all its biological mystery, is essential for both mental and physical health. It is a phenomenon common to virtually all species and so must be hard wired into the human biological make-up. The requirement for sleep varies between individuals (Mrs Thatcher was famously said to require only four hours a night) but the fact that so many prescriptions are required indicates a major problem of people not being able to get to sleep without chemical assistance.
What effort is made by doctors and patients to identify causes and try alternative remedies before resorting to drugs with potentially serious adverse health consequences? I suspect very little.
Heart conditions
"On average, patients with heart failure take 6.8 prescription medications per day, resulting in 10.1 doses per day, not including over-the-counter (OTC) or complementary and alternative medications. (12 Apr 2017) Around 920,000 people in the UK today have been diagnosed with heart failure. Both the incidence and prevalence of heart failure increase steeply with age, and the average age at diagnosis is 77.12 Sept 2018 Statins are one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the UK: around 7-8 million adults in the UK take them, and over 71 million prescription items were dispensed in 2018."
We may conclude from the disparity between the number of people diagnosed with a heart condition and the number of Statin prescriptions, that these drugs are widely prescribed by doctors as a preventive measure as well as a treatment for high cholesterol and heart conditions. The problem is that the whole regime based on, and promoted by, drug companies, that saturated fat consumption leads to high cholesterol and that this in turn leads to ischaemic heart disease and strokes, is wholly misplaced and misguided. It has spawned huge profits for the manufactures but also created a whole range of medical disorders unnecessarily.
As Dr David Diamond and others have conclusively demonstrated, the association is largely illusionary, as is the claimed benefit for Statins in the prevention of these conditions (around one percent not the forty or fifty per cent claimed) and is by far off-set by their adverse consequences. As he has shown, it is not saturated fats but excess carbohydrates and sugars that predominantly cause the problem, although of course other related factors are involved.
Statins have made billions for drug companies around the world but particularly in Europe and North America, based it would seem on a convenient (for them) misnomer. Yet again doctors are the active participants and facilitators in a costly scam!
Pain relief
"PHE’s analysis shows that, in 2017 to 2018, 11.5 million adults in England (26% of the adult population) received, and had dispensed, one or more prescriptions for any of the medicines within the scope of the review. The totals for each medicine were:
antidepressants 7.3 million people (17% of the adult population) opioid pain medicines 5.6 million (13%) gabapentinoids 1.5 million (3%) benzodiazepines 1.4 million (3%) z-drugs 1.0 million (2%)
There are large variations in the standardised rates of prescribing across clinical commissioning groups (CCGs)."
It is over seventy years since George Orwell predicted the generalised application of 'Soma' to keep the general population placated and we are now well on our way to fulfilling it. The NHS has become an indispensable part of our 'Oceania' as became all too clear in the Covid debacle.
CONCLUSION
These statistics are truly startling. It would seem, even leaving aside the recreational use of non prescription drugs and those not requiring a prescription, on average at least twenty prescriptions per person per year are made. Given the proportion not on medication of any kind, for those taking them, the figure must be much higher. The cost to the NHS and nation, both directly and in adverse effects, is truly staggering.
For 2021 the figures were:
The cost of prescription items dispensed in the community in England was £9.61 billion, a 3.49% increase of £324 million from £9.28 billion in 2019/20.
The number of prescription items dispensed in the community in England was 1.11 billion, a 1.90% decrease of 21.5 million items from 1.13 billion in 2019/20.
Atorvastatin was the most dispensed drug in England in 2020/21 with 49.9 million items, while Apixaban was the drug with the highest cost of £356 million.
Sertraline 100mg tablets was the presentation with the largest absolute increase in cost between 2019/20 and 2020/21 of £78.9 million, from £21.0 million to £99.9 million.
Government has been aware of the widespread, unnecessary and adverse effects of drugs for decades but has effectively promoted them with the active assistance of 'big pharma', the NHS and the medical profession. The situation is getting worse not better. Drastic action is required to reverse the trend. The survival of the NHS as well as the public's health depend on it.
WHAT IS THE ANSWER?
The question posed at the top of this article was, "How do we wean doctors and the nation off of drugs?
First and foremost, both doctors currently prescribing them and patients demanding them must want to come off them. That is the psychological province of the will, of beliefs and attitudes conditioned by society at large and by the propaganda we call advertising.
People must be properly and adequately educated about their bodies and how to keep them working healthily. It is a task that starts in the home, continues in school and hopefully continues thereafter. Much illness and disease is preventable but there will always be instances that are not and that will benefit from chemical interventions. A clear separation between the two is essential.
The relationship between drug companies, government, the NHS and the medical profession needs to be tightly controlled to prevent undue influence or conflict of interest. Better use of proprietary brands and control of prices is needed to cut the overall cost. 'Free at the point of use' should be limited to true need.
Prevention is obviously better than cure, but clearly far more needs to be done in this sphere where there is a proven link between life style habits and resultant illness. Alcohol, diet, smoking and stress are obvious areas.
There needs to be far more open debate and freedom of expression surrounding the claimed advantages of certain drugs and procedures, or of underlying medical givens. The role of cholesterol in the incidence of heart disease and the effectiveness of statins in their prevention is an obvious one. The necessity and effectiveness of vaccination regimes is another. The widespread use of drugs in mental decline is another. The prescription of pain killers in place of osteopathy (not available on the NHS) is another.
Sickness can be as much a social condition as a physical one. Financial and other incentives and disincentives need to be considered. The system should be so organised to be able to address causes rather than just treating the symptoms.
Covid highlighted the weaknesses in the GP service that have continued since. Patients have faced multiple barriers to seeing the doctor. This may have accounted for the reduction in prescriptions referenced above. However the nature and purpose of the interaction needs to change, so that it is less of a drug prescribing service, to one that promotes natural and obvious remedies. These could be provided at a fraction of the cost for much greater savings long term. GP payments should be more closely tied to performance an outcomes rather than just numbers on a list.
Medicine likes to think of itself as a science. It also requires a high level of practical skill. But somewhere along the line the social and environmental inputs have been given less attention. Health after is largely a reflection of these. Drugs and vaccines have too long been regarded as 'magic bullets'. Somehow we need to break the spell if the problem of drug dependence and its multiplicity of adverse consequences is to be addressed.
CASE STUDIES
Only yesterday I sat on a bench with a woman in her late thirties I suppose (it is considered rude to ask a woman her age!) who said she had been very ill for a year with a range of symptoms including brain seizures. This she said had finally been put down to a drug wrongly prescribed and finally changed. She did not say what condition the drug was prescribed for, but claimed it had ruined her heart, for which she now had to take other medications. She did not 'look' well. A taxi arrived to take her and her shopping home. She said she spent most of her time in bed too poorly to do anything. Of course this is too unspecific to be much use but how representative is it of the general population and a much bigger problem?
A more reliable example is as follows. A seventy year old man suffered severe chest pains, diagnosed at the local hospital as a serious heart attack for which emergency admission and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI), also known as angioplasty or coronary angioplasty was applied. A blockage or clot located in the left coronary artery was dispersed and two metal stents implanted to restore normal blood supply, notwithstanding the damaged caused to the heart muscle. Subsequently four days were spent recuperating in the cardiac unit. Further procedures were proposed but declined.
Now as to standard drug regime in such cases, the following drugs were prescribed, to be taken on a permanent daily basis thereafter:
I expect most people know about the huge share fluctuations on related stock prior to the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington in 2001. It with many other reliable indicators pointed to the fact that certain influential quarters were aware of what was going to happen and profited financially from it.
A similar phenomenon seems to be apparent in what some have called the Covid 'Scamdemic'. Whilst nations have extended their debt base by billions to pay for vaccines, PPE, employment subsidies, tracing and testing, often fraudulent or useless, a whole range of companies and their investors and speculators, have benefitted enormously.
Below are just a few examples of companies where share prices have trebled or quadrupled pre and post Covid. The share price is based on turnover and profit. Clearly whilst the tax-payer (and now consumer from the effects of inflation) have lost billions, speculators in the know have accumulated proportionately.
This one created health event, hugely exaggerated and over-reacted to by government, has thus proved a very effective way for those with capital to make eye watering sums, whilst plunging government into increased debt and fuelling inflation, now running at about 10% in Britain. This has the inevitable effect of squeezing the middle classes, pauperising the poorest, widening the gap between the haves and have nots, eating away at savings, cutting spending, deterring growth, devaluing the currency.
We may conclude that Covid - no not Covid but the Government's preposterous reaction to it! - was bad for the general public but good for a range of companies, their investors and speculators. However it would be something of a leap to say these organisations either were in the know, or anticipated or even welcomed or facilitated the panic for their own ends, but it is not out of the question.
As always 'Cui bono' or 'who benefits', is the acid test. The question is will anyone be bothered to forensically examine the topic or do anything about it?
• COVID-19 is clearly no longer an emergency. The real emergency now is the continued use of the COVID “vaccines,” because they’re creating injuries on a level that is truly alarming and unprecedented. VAERS data reveal the COVID jabs have caused more harm in 18 months than all other vaccines on the market, combined, over the past three decades
• Raw data from the Pfizer trial also show the shots were associated with an increased risk for death from the start, and both Pfizer and the FDA knew it
• Data also show highly “vaccinated” and boosted nations are now experiencing record case and death rates from COVID compared to countries with low injection rates
• We’re now finding the COVID shots have negative efficacy, meaning, if you have received the shot and are exposed to COVID, you are more likely to get sick, not less likely, compared to someone who is unvaccinated
• The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has developed a protocol for those injured by the COVID jabs called I-RECOVER, which you can download from covid19criticalcare.com in several different languages
[June 18, 2022] In the “Tea Time” episode above, Drs. Pierre Kory and Paul Marik review the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) protocol for those injured by the COVID jabs. They also discuss what’s in the shots, their lack of safety and efficacy, adverse events, and the controversial issue of “shedding.”
Kory and Marik are both part of the FLCCC, which was founded in 2020 to share early treatment protocols for COVID-19. Kory is an ICU specialist, triple board certified in internal medicine, critical care and pulmonary medicine. He now runs a private tele-health practice specializing in the treatment of COVID-19, so-called “long-COVID” and vaccine injuries.
Marik is one of the most-published ICU specialists in the world, and best known for his vitamin C protocol for sepsis. The FLCCC’s protocol for COVID is known as the MATH+ protocol, which has undergone multiple revisions over the course of the pandemic.
Now, as injuries from the COVID jab are stacking up, they’ve also added a post-vaccine treatment called I-RECOVER,1 which you can download from covid19criticalcare.com in several different languages.
A Pandemic of Serious Vaccine Injuries
“My heart is so broken, I cannot keep quiet anymore,” Marik said, choking back tears during a Children’s Health Defense hearing in Ohio where several vaccine injured patients also shared their tragic journeys. “This is a humanitarian crisis! These people are suffering. This is real disease.”
Patients injured by the COVID jab repeatedly report receiving no help when they go to the hospital. There’s seemingly no help anywhere. This must change. We have to face the fact that we now have an unrecognized epidemic of vaccine injury.
At present, there are no specialized vaccine injury clinics, but eventually, there probably will be. In the meantime, the FLCCC is sharing their I-RECOVER2 protocol with the world, with the hopes that doctors will begin to take those with COVID jab injuries seriously and treat them appropriately.
As noted by Kory, COVID-19 is no longer an emergency. The real emergency now is the continued use of the COVID “vaccines,” because they’re creating injuries on a level that is truly alarming and unprecedented.
He also cites life insurance data showing historic rises in excess mortality among young people, and those data are supported by vaccine injuries reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as well. According to Kory, estimates suggest some 500,000 Americans may have lost their lives to these shots.
Data also show highly “vaccinated” and boosted nations are now experiencing record case and death rates from COVID compared to countries with low injection rates.
What’s in the Shots?
The short answer to that question is, “we have no idea,” and that puts medical professionals in a very precarious position. Since they do not know they’re giving their patients, they can’t even make educated recommendations based on the patient’s medical history, allergies and so on.
While the manufacturers have revealed some of the ingredients — such as mRNA, PEG and nanolipid particles — investigations have discovered things in the shots that aren’t indicated by the manufacturer. One such ingredient is graphene oxide, which can be seen under an electron microscope, but isn’t on the list of ingredients. Other unknown contaminants have also been found.
What’s more, while we know the shots contain “mRNA,” we have no way of knowing exactly what that mRNA is designed to do, or might accidentally do. As noted by Marik, it’s been genetically altered, so it’s not a direct copy of the mRNA found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but aside from that, we cannot be sure about its makeup.
Marik also points out the Pfizer data shows there are distinct differences in side effects depending on the lot you get. So, all lots are not the same. This basically makes it impossible to make definitive assertions about the ingredients, as any given lot may or may not contain them. The amount of any given ingredient may also vary.
Is the COVID Shot Safe and Effective?
When media and health officials say the shots are safe and effective, what does that actually mean? As noted by Kory, “safe and effective” is NOT a statement about a scientific conclusion. They’re “neither safe nor effective,” he says.
The “safe and effective” claim is simply propaganda and meets the definition of false information, because the data “backing” the safe and effective narrative completely ignore the adverse event data.
Kory notes we have documents showing the Department of Health and Human Services paid $1 billion to media companies to advertise the jabs. We also have evidence that first-tier journals are rejecting analyses of injuries. So, they’re very selective about what they publish.
Direct-to-consumer prescription drug ads accounted for $6 billion in spending alone in 2016, which amounted to 4.6 million ads, including 663,000 television commercials, mostly for high-cost biologics and cancer immunotherapies.3 It may be close to $10 billion now as that statistic is 6 years old. We know it is at LEAST $7 billion as the government kicked in $1 billion for COVID propaganda.
Public health agencies have also been very selective about the data they publish in order to protect the narrative. Health agencies in Scotland and the U.S., for example, suddenly stopped publishing data when the trend turned against the COVID shots and ineffectiveness and harms were becoming apparent.
Still, VAERS’ data reveal these jabs have caused more harm in 18 months than all other vaccines on the market, combined, over the past three decades. Raw data from the Pfizer trial — which were analyzed by experts after Pfizer and the Food and Drug Administration were sued and forced to release them — also show they were unsafe and associated with an increased risk for death from the start, and both Pfizer and the FDA knew it.
According to Marik, Moderna and Pfizer also manipulated their efficacy data to make the shots appear far better than they actually were. Recalculations have found the initial efficacy was actually more like 12%, not 95% as claimed, Marik says.
Negative Efficacy Demonstrated
Not only did the shots fail to live up to their initial claims of effectiveness, but we’re now finding they even have negative efficacy. As explained by Kory, negative efficacy means that if you have received the shot and are exposed to COVID, you are more likely to get sick, not less likely, compared to someone who is unvaccinated.
According to Kory, negative efficacy is demonstrated in several different data sources, including Walgreens, which created its own COVID tracker database for patients getting their tests and shots at Walgreens. Its data show COVID-jabbed individuals are testing positive for COVID at far higher rates than the unjabbed, and those who got their last shot five months or more ago have the highest risk.
As you can see in the screenshot from Walgreens’ COVID-19 tracker4 below, during the week of May 31 through June 6, 2022, 24.4% of unvaccinated individuals who got tested for COVID got a positive result. Of those who had gotten just one COVID shot, the positivity rate was 31.6%.
Of those who received two doses five months or more ago, 34.3% tested positive, and of those who received a third dose five months or more ago, the positive rate was 38.5%. “I’m very, very concerned for those who have been vaccinated and boosted,” Kory says.
Data from the U.K. Health Security Agency also show that the boosted now have three to four times higher COVID case rates, compared to the unvaccinated, and this is true for all age groups except children under 18.5,6 They’re also at greater risk of repeated COVID infections.
Do the COVID Shots ‘Shed’?
What about “vaccine shedding”? Marik admits to being extremely doubtful about the idea of spike protein shedding when he first heard about it, but has since changed his mind. He’s now convinced that it does happen, even though we do not yet fully understand the mechanism behind it.
He cites a study that looked at unvaccinated children of parents who had received the injections. The parents all had an antibody against the spike protein in their noses, and surprisingly, a large percentage of the unvaccinated children did as well. “So, somehow, the antibody is getting from the parent to the child,” he says.
Another concept that might explain it is that of exosomes. Exosomes are lipid particles that circulate in your blood. They’re also found in the nose and lungs. If you’ve received the COVID jab, you’re going to have circulating exosomes with spike protein on them, so it’s not inconceivable that you might spread these exosomes via nasal discharge or even just through breathing. “You could exhale these exosomes,” Marik says, “which are then inhaled [by others].”
Kory also points out that in the Pfizer trial, they included a “very curious exclusion criteria.” Anyone in the same household as someone who had received the shot was excluded from the trial, which suggests they may have been concerned about some sort of transfer or shedding.
Anecdotally, he has also encountered many unvaccinated patients, primarily women, who report severe disruptions to their menstrual cycles after coming into close contact (although not necessarily intimate contact) with someone who had recently received the jab.
Post-Jab Avalanche of Rare Diseases
Regardless of where the spike protein comes from — the virus itself, the shot or close contact shedding — it’s clear it can have wide-ranging adverse effects. The jab itself, however, is the most problematic, as your body is continuously producing this toxic protein, and we still don’t know if that production ever shuts off.
As previously predicted, we’re now starting to see a rapid rise in a number of conditions, including previously very rare ones. Among them, hepatitis among young children, appendicitis and several rare forms of cancer, some of which are extremely aggressive and fast-moving.
In late 2021, Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist, reported seeing a 20-fold increase in endometrial cancer, as well as a “massive uptick” in autoimmune diseases.7 (Not surprisingly, he’s now accused of misdiagnosing two patients with cancers they never had in order to support a false claim.8)
According to Kory, post-jab cancer proliferation is not all that surprising, as several of the mechanisms of the jabs degrade your immune function, and your immune system is your first line of defense against all disease, including cancer.
Marik also points out that the spike protein is “profoundly toxic” in and of itself as well, and interferes with cancer suppressing genes. “So, there’s no doubt that the spike protein causes an increase in the risk of cancer,” he says. “The problem is, what do you do about it? How do you get rid of the spike?”
Two Strategies to Eliminate Spike Protein
Marik and Kory believe there may be ways to boost the immune system to allow it to degrade and eventually remove the spike from your cells. One of the strategies they recommend for this is TRE (time restricted easting), which stimulates autophagy, a natural cleaning process that eliminates damaged, misfolded and toxic proteins.
In many ways Marik is a fairly rigid conventional physician who is simply unaware of many effective therapies natural physicians use. One major omission he is unaware of is sauna therapy. This is especially true when combined with TRE, as it will radically increase autophagy and heat shock proteins which will address the prion like diseases recently reported with COVID jabs and as predicted last year by MIT research scientist Stephanie Seneff.
Infrared saunas are clearly the best saunas out there as I detail in my epic article on sauna earlier this year. One of the primary reasons is the increase in mitochondrial melatonin.
Ivermectin also binds to the spike protein, thereby facilitating its removal. As noted by Marik, the best advice is to avoid the spike protein in the first place. Don’t take the COVID jab, and if you get COVID-19, treat it early and aggressively.
The spike protein is toxic regardless of whether it comes from the natural infection or the injection. Early and aggressive treatment will lower your spike protein load, thereby reducing your risk of long-COVID.
Kory stresses that, at present, they still do not know the exact correct dose for ivermectin. When prescribed for long-COVID and vaccine injury, he monitors the patient and adjusts the dosage based on individual response. That said, he typically starts patients out at a mid-range dose of 0.3 milligrams per kilogram of bodyweight, daily.
Now, he’s noticed that when it comes to ivermectin, there are responders and nonresponders. It works exceptionally well for some, while benefits are negligible in others. That said, a majority of patients do tend to experience a benefit. The length of treatment is also highly variable.
As for safety, it’s been used for over 50 years9 and has a remarkably robust safety profile. We now also have a large-scale Brazilian study in which patients received ivermectin for four days every month for six months. Curiously, not only was COVID incidence dramatically reduced, but kidney and liver function actually improved with this treatment. Marik also dismisses claims that ivermectin can be harmful to your liver, saying it’s actually used to treat fatty liver disease.
So, overall, “we have not seen a safety signal … with long-term use,” Kory says. “Some of that is published data, and some of it is just our experience with treating patients.” Marik adds, “It’s one of the safest medications … even when taken in high doses appropriately.”
FLCCC Vaccine Injury Protocol: First Line Therapies
The full first line protocol for vaccine injury is as follows. Keep in mind, however, that the treatment must be individualized to the symptoms of each patient. As explained by Marik, the patient’s response will determine future treatment and adjunct therapies. These are not symptom specific but rather listed in order of importance:10
Time Restricted Eating or periodic daily fasts. Fasting has a profound effect on promoting immune system homeostasis, partly by stimulating the removal of damaged cells and mitochondria and clearing misfolded and foreign proteins. Intermittent fasting likely has an important role in promoting the breakdown and elimination of the spike protein. Fasting is contraindicated in patients under 18 (impairs growth) and during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Patients with diabetes, as well as those with serious underlying medical conditions, should consult their primary care provider prior to fasting, as changes in their medications may be required and these patients require close monitoring.
Ivermectin — 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg, daily for up to 4 to 6 weeks. Ivermectin has potent anti-inflammatory properties. It also binds to the spike protein, aiding in the elimination by the host. It is likely that ivermectin and intermittent fasting act synergistically to rid the body of the spike protein.
Ivermectin is best taken with or just following a meal for greater absorption. A trial of ivermectin should be considered as first line therapy. It appears that patients can be grouped into two categories: i) ivermectin responders and ii) ivermectin nonresponders.
This distinction is important, as the latter are more difficult to treat and require more aggressive therapy. Due to the possible drug interaction between quercetin and ivermectin, these drugs should not be taken simultaneously (i.e., should be staggered morning and night).
Low dose naltrexone (LDN) — Begin with 1 mg/day and increase to 4.5 mg/day, as required. May take 2 to 3 months to see full effect. LDN has been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory, analgesic and neuromodulating properties.
Melatonin — 2 to 6 mg slow release/extended release prior to bedtime. Melatonin has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and is a powerful regulator of mitochondrial function. The dose should be started at 750 mcg (μg) to 1 mg at night and increased as tolerated. Patients who are slow metabolizers may have very unpleasant and vivid dreams with higher doses.
Aspirin — 81 mg/day. (Please note: I do not agree with the routine use of aspirin, and recommend proteolytic enzymes such as lumbrokinase and serrapeptase on an empty stomach instead. Both serve to digest unwanted proteins in your blood, like blood clots.
They also help combat inflammation and rebalance your immune system, facilitating the removal of inflammatory proteins, removing fibrin — a clotting material that restricts blood flow and prolongs inflammation — reducing edema in inflamed regions, and boosting the potency of macrophages and killer cells.)
Vitamin C — 1000 mg orally three to four times a day. Vitamin C has important anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immune-enhancing properties, including increased synthesis of type I interferons. Avoid in patients with a history of kidney stones. Oral Vitamin C helps promote growth of protective bacterial populations in the microbiome.
It is important to note that these high doses are a pharmaceutical application of vitamin C and NOT recommended for daily use. It is far better to use whole food vitamin C and not ascorbic acid for daily use. I actually will be speaking with Dr. Marik and Korey September 9 and 10 at a vitamin C conference11 in Clearwater, Florida. If you come to the event you will be able to meet me personally there.
Vitamin D and Vitamin K2 — A dose of 4,000 to 5,000 units/day of vitamin D, together with vitamin K2 100 mcg/day is a reasonable starting dose. The dose of Vitamin D should be adjusted according to the baseline vitamin D level.
Quercetin — 250 to 500 mg/day (or mixed flavonoids). Flavonoids have broad spectrum anti-inflammatory properties, inhibit mast cells, and have been demonstrated to reduce neuroinflammation.
Due to a possible drug interaction between quercetin and ivermectin, these drugs should not be taken simultaneously (i.e., should be staggered morning and night). The use of quercetin has rarely been associated with hypothyroidism.
The clinical impact of this association may be limited to those individuals with preexistent thyroid disease or those with subclinical thyroidism. Quercetin should be used with caution in patients with hypothyroidism and TSH levels should be monitored.
Nigella Sativa — 200 to 500 mg twice daily. It should be noted that thymoquinone (the active ingredient of Nigella sativa) decreases the absorption of cyclosporine and phenytoin. Patients taking these drugs should, therefore, avoid taking Nigella sativa. Furthermore, two cases of serotonin syndrome have been reported in patients taking Nigella sativa who underwent general anesthesia (probable interaction with opiates).
Probiotics/prebiotics — Patients with post-vaccine syndrome classically have a severe dysbiosis with loss of Bifidobacterium. Kefir is a highly recommended nutritional supplement high in probiotics.
Magnesium — 500 mg/day.
Omega-3 fatty acids — DHA/EPA 4 g/day. Omega-3 fatty acids play an important role in the resolution of inflammation by inducing resolvin production.
FLCCC Second Line Therapies for Vaccine Injury
Adjunctive and/or second line therapies in the FLCCC’s vaccine injury protocol are:
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) — 200 mg twice daily for 1–2 weeks, then reduce as tolerated to 200 mg/day. HCQ is the preferred second line agent.
HCQ is a potent immunomodulating agent, and is considered the drug of choice for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), where it has been demonstrated to reduce mortality from this disease. Thus, in patients with positive autoantibodies or where autoimmunity is suspected to be a prominent underlying mechanism, HCQ should be considered earlier.
Further, it should be noted that SLE and post-vaccine syndrome have many features in common. HCQ is safe in pregnancy; indeed, this drug has been used to treat preeclampsia. With long term usage, the dose should be reduced (100 or 150 mg/day) in patients weighing less than 61 kg (135 lbs).
Intravenous vitamin C — 25 g weekly, together with oral Vitamin C 1000 mg (1 gram) 2–3 times per day. High dose IV vitamin C is “caustic” to the veins and should be given slowly over 2–4 hours.
Furthermore, to assess patient tolerability the initial dose should be between 7.5–15 g. Total daily doses of 8–12 g have been well-tolerated, however chronic high doses have been associated with the development of kidney stones, so the duration of therapy should be limited. Wean IV vitamin C as tolerated.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) — NIBS using transcranial direct current stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation has been demonstrated to improve cognitive function in patients with long COVID as well as other neurological diseases. NIBS is painless, extremely safe, and easy to administer. It is a recognized therapy offered by many Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Centers. Patients may also purchase an FDA-approved device for home use.
Fluvoxamine — Start on a low dose of 12.5 mg/day and increase slowly as tolerated.
“Mitochondrial energy optimizer” with pyrroloquinoline quinone (e.g., Life Extension Energy Optimizer or ATP 360®).
N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) — 600–1500 mg/day.
Low dose corticosteroid — 10–15 mg/day prednisone for three weeks. Taper to 10 mg/day and then 5 mg/day, as tolerated.
Behavioral modification, mindfulness therapy, and psychological support — May help improve patient’s overall well-being and mental health. Suicide is a real problem in the vaccine-injured patient. Support groups and consultation with mental health professionals are important.
Tai Chi and Yoga — Tai Chi, a health-promoting form of traditional Chinese martial art, has shown to be beneficial for preventing and treating diseases including long COVID. Yoga has immunomodulating properties that may be beneficial in vaccine-injured patients.
It should be noted that long COVID is characterized by severe post-exertional fatigue and/or worsening of symptoms, therefore patients should be counseled to moderate exertion, increasing slowly only as tolerated.
Examples of third line therapies and other potential remedies include hyperbaric oxygen therapy, whole body vibration therapy, cold hydrotherapy, nutraceuticals such as dandelion and broccoli sprout powder and carbon 60 (C60 fullerenes). For the full list, see the I-RECOVER Post-Vaccine Treatment Protocol12 available on covid19criticalcare.com.13
Dr Vernon Coleman’s track record of spotting health dangers is second to none. Since the 1970s, when his first two ground breaking books (The Medicine Men and Paper Doctors) were published, Dr Coleman has been gaining friends among patients and enemies among doctors and drug companies.
