Showing posts sorted by relevance for query psychiatry. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query psychiatry. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 October 2016

Assange barrister jumps in front of train.


http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/02/Wikileaks-founder-Julian-Assange-prepares-to-speak-from-the-balcony-of-the-Ecuadorian-embassy-where-he-continues-to-seek-asylum-Getty-640x480.png


I have only just come across this story via a 'Facebook' post, but despite the passage of time, I thought it worthy of a little consideration. Perhaps some of the readers will be unaware of it also.


Summary

On the 18th August, 2016, St Pancras Coroners Court heard that at about 7 am on 18th April, 2016, John Jones QC, a 48 year old barrister who worked on war crimes trials at The Hague, had died instantly when he jumped in front of a moving train at West Hampstead Thameslink station. Although not referred to in the proceedings, it was well known that he represented Julian Assange, stilled holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy, in his legal fight against extradition to Sweden on an accusation of sexual assault. (1)

Some have suspected and suggested that his death was not as 'accidental' as it has been suggested, and that there are more sinister reasons for it, possibly involving covert action by the intelligence services of Britain and/or America. Certainly there is no doubt that Assange has been a great inconvenience and embarrassment to the UK authorities, and 'Wikileaks' a thorn in the side of the US Government. 

Only recently Hilary Clinton refused to answer a question as to whether she at one stage had called for his assassination! So his fears of extradition, 'rendition' or even assassination appear to be well placed. Whether such a threat would extend to his defending barrister is a matter of conjecture, but it is not beyond the realms of possibility. (2)

However set against this, is the Coroner Mary Hassell's assurance that she had seen the video footage of the event -and was satisfied that “nobody else was involved”. It was not shown to the jury as she said she thought it would be “too distressing”.  Such decisions, though understandable, can of course fan suspicions of intrigue. 

What is beyond doubt is there are some very strange and inexplicable elements to this tragedy, that have not been fully or convincingly explained, including why a man with suicidal thoughts was prescribed drugs that are likely to make matters worse, why he was allowed to remain isolated in his room, why active therapies were not applied and why he was allowed to leave the hospital at five o'clock in the morning, with no arrangements in place or any form of supervision?



John Jones, a highly respected QC, took his own life after he was allowed to leave private hospital The Nightingale to go for a 5am walk
http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/qc_who_worked_on_julian_assange_case_jumped_in_front_of_west_hampstead_train_after_being_allowed_out_of_private_hospital_1_4664571


A school trauma thirty (?) years before

It would appear from reports of the proceedings (3) that Mr Jones (who it might be noted had a passing resemblance the then Prime Minister, David Cameron!) had suffered from mental issues since a traumatic event when at school in America when still a youth. After this he then attended another boarding school in America where he became “deeply unhappy”, leading to psychiatric intervention before returning to the UK where he attended a private sixth form college before winning a place at Oxford University.

Referring to the initial expelling incident he wrote:

“Every morning I wake up with the mental pain of the fact that I was expelled from Exeter... the pain has not diminished... I feel that facing up to it may leave me unable to function... I need to be able to know that I suffered an adolescent trauma, that I’m not loopy now. I have suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for the past 30 years... It’s a bit like Tom Cruise’s character in (the film) Vanilla Sky.” 

Perhaps rather coincidentally the film made in 2001 was released on Blu-ray on June 30, 2015 in North America. (4) He also referred to "being triggered" by  certain words and films he had seen, any mention of which would set off his negative thought patterns - a classic feature of mind-control experimentation. The question as to whether he was ever targeted by government agencies at any stage, cannot be avoided.


"Vanilla Sky"



http://static.spin.com/files/121213-10-Vanilla-Sky-640x426.jpg


As the film is referred to specifically, we should note that the plot centres around a love affair, resulting in a former partner trying to kill the main protagonist, David Aames, played by Tom Cruise. This in turn results in her death and his disfigurement, requiring him subsequently to wear a mask. The two females become interchangeable in what appears to be a waking dream-like guilty state, with overtones of involvement by a mysterious agency referred to as "Life Extension", that specialises in cryonic suspension. In the Blu-ray version he wakes up in bed and a voice tells him "Open your eyes. You're going to be fine." The word "personality" it should be noted comes from the Greek root, meaning "a mask".

All of this has certain resonance with the well known CIA mind control programmes of the post war period, called MKUltra. (5) Sadly the film culminates rather prophetically in the subject, David Aames, conquering his final fear by jumping off a building, his life flashing before his eyes, before he hits the ground.

Phillips Exeter Academy


http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-05-02-ScreenShot20130502at4.35.30PM.png


His mother is quoted as saying, he was expelled from a prestigious boys’ boarding school, 'Phillips Exeter' in New Hampshire, for “several ill-judged, high spirited antics” – a source of regret which troubled him for the rest of his life. What this could have been, sufficient to play on his mind for so long after, was not revealed. We can only surmise as to whether it subsequently influenced his choice of career and client. What is hard to believe is that it could have been a major factor some thirty years later in the reckless decision that would surely end his life. Could it be that that the reference to this film specifically was intended to reveal a deeper truth regarding his psychological state and past or present circumstances? (6)

High Profile Legal Career

Apparently the move back to Britain from the Hague had been fraught with unspecified practical and emotional difficulty and he had problems settling into the the Doughty Street Chambers shared by such luminaries as Geoffrey Robertson QC, St Pancras MP Keir Starmer, Edward Fitzgerald QC, Helena Kennedy QC, and many more - even Amal Clooney, recently appointed to the UK Attorney General’s expert panel set up to advise and represent the UK government in cases involving public international law. (7)

image
http://yourbarristerboyfriend.tumblr.com/post/81660174963/inside-the-doughty-street-dreamboat-why-amal
Returning from The Hague in September 2015 his mother said he was in good spirits, but in his new home he became “increasingly agitated and stressed”.  In early 2016 he had trouble sleeping and talked about suicide “only in the abstract” telling her he would never take his life because of his children.
In March he tried to get an adjournment on the Assange case as he was unable to work, his mind foggy with medication, but the judge refused, pushing him into “a dark, depressive phase”, according to his wife. Dr Pereira added he thought this was a significant factor in his emotional decline. He was quoted as saying: “He was very disappointed at not being able to do the case. He felt his career was beginning to unravel.” 

Mental Deterioration, Diagnosis and Treatment
Mr Jones’ wife said they had a “wonderful relationship” although John was someone who “often needed encouragement”. She described how his difficulty sleeping left him exhausted and worried about his ability to perform at work. “He started doubting himself and all the decisions he had made in his life. He felt he was useless and had failed.
At no stage in the inquest does it appear that medical decisions relating to the chosen medication and the part it might have played was questioned, although the diagnosis of "bi-polar disorder" after a one hour meeting with Dr Pereira surprised his wife because she said: “John could be obsessive, and could ruminate, but he didn’t have highs and lows.” 

His Consultant Psychiatrist

Dr Stephen Pereira from his CV appears to be an highly qualified and experienced
Consultant Psychiatrist. He states on his page, 
"With 26 years of experience in Psychiatry and 30 years experience in Behaviour and Cognitive Therapy (CBT), I trained at the Institute of Psychiatry in Behaviour Therapy and at Oxford in Cognitive Therapy (which has a worldwide reputation in this area).  I am also Chairman of NAPICU (Napicu.org.uk) which formulates National Standards of Clinical Excellence in Intensive Care Psychiatry and Severe Mental Disorders. I have over 20 years of experience in dealing with the whole spectrum of mental wellbeing issues in the ‘City Financial District’ and those affecting high achieving individuals in politics, film, media, fashion and music.  I am one of a very few Consultant Psychiatrists (medically trained) who also have been formally trained in CBT." (10)
The Coroner Ms Hassell was critical of the fact that Mr Jones was allowed to isolate himself in the hospital and had not been made to engage with the various forms of therapy on offer and of the “perfunctory” tick-box risk assessment form apparently carried by the patients themselves. Mr Jones' mother was unimpressed with the ethos of the hospital and considered the relaxed atmosphere was "out of sync with seriousness of John's condition". She also formed the opinion that Dr Pereira was "trying to break her son" (which he denied) who appears to have been over medicated with a drug with suicidal side effects. Despite his depression and suicidal thoughts (which materialised) Dr Pereira none the less took the view that "he had not  met the threshold for sectioning" - despite harm to self or others being part of that assessment. And finally despite his known condition, he had been allowed out at 5 am without supervision or any sense of potential alarm. Mr Jones’ wife, lawyer Misa Zgonec-Rozej, expressed the view that, “I feel horrified that he was allowed out so early in the morning, in such a fragile state and without having slept properly for days." 
All of these factors sit rather uneasily with Dr Pereira's undoubted expertise.
The Nightingale Private Hospital, Marylebone, London

The exterior of Nightingale Hospital. Image: Nightingale Hospital   http://motherboard.vice.com/read/inside-a-private-london-tech-addiction-clinic
So we may conclude that Mr Jones was under medical supervision and prescribed anti-depressants from at least January 2016 but it is not clear if Dr Pereira or some other doctor/GP had been in charge of him and if so who this might have been.  By March he was "foggy with medication". It appears it was Mr Jones parents - Ms Jones and her husband, Hugh - who had their son admitted to The Nightingale Private Hospital on Dr Pereira’s recommendation. It is reported he had been signed off sick from Doughty Street and had been receiving treatment for only a few weeks when he died. One might have expected the juxtaposition of treatment and intentional death might have led to questions about the treatment.

The role of Chlonazepam and other medications not revealed
The Inquest did reveal that whilst at the Nightingale, Mr Jones decided to stop taking 'Chlonazepam', a benzodopiate, a couple of weeks before he died, as "the combination of medication he was taking was making him drowsy and unable to concentrate."  So we should note that Chlonazepam was not the only medication prescribed as it states 'the combination of medication'. Yet these other drugs that also either singly or in combination may facilitate suicidal urges is not recorded which is surprising. (9) Chlonazepam is specifically so noted. 

From Wikipedia we have this: "It may increase risk of suicide in people who are depressed."(8) 

The drug patented in 1964, and therefore regarded as 'older generation', is often prescribed for anxiety and to prevent muscle spasm. For a specialist to prescribe this drug to someone depressed with suicidal thoughts appears to be hard to explain, particularly if in combination with others as seems to be the case. The day before he died he met his mother Peggy, in a local park. She told the inquest: “I was shocked at how thin he was. He couldn’t stop shaking, and I wondered what effect the medication was having.” No specific information of the drugs, their dosage and dates taken - critically important in any consideration of the part played by the drugs - appears to have been made publicly available to the inquest!

Highly questionable decision to allow him out alone at 5 am.
Another very strange aspect, given the known background and symptoms of Mr Jones, was that he was allowed out alone at the unseasonal hour of 5 am after what appears to be peremptory and superficial "risk assessment". It was said because he had not been 'sectioned' as allowed for under the mental health acts, he could not be forcibly prevented from leaving at that hour, but there appears to have been no attempt to dissuade him, to discover his intentions or to advise his next of kin. Nor is there any indication of an agreed time time limit, or specified destination or of any attempt to look for him when he didn't return. In under two hours he was dead! No information is provided as to when the hospital learnt of his accident and demise.  For a specialist institution with detailed relevant information at their finger-tips, to take such a relaxed, some might say negligent, attitude to a patient, certainly raises questions above and beyond whether he did or did not sufficiently engage in 'social activities'.

Absence of critical information on travel and accident itself

Between just after five in the morning and seven he had travelled about three miles to the north east to arrive at the West Hampstead Station. No information was given how he got there. Did he walk as he said he would or take some other form of transport? Did he go there directly or did he take a circuitous route? Did he meet or interact with anyone on the way? Why did he end up in that particular station? Had he purchased a ticket to get there or from there to somewhere else? What did the station CCT cameras record immediately before the accident. Only the train driver is mentioned as witnessing what he described in a written statement as "a deliberate act". This still begs the question if he was alone on the platform - surely not at 7 am on a Monday morning - and if so who else was there and why not one other was referred to as a witness?

Conclusion

This is yet another tragic case it would appear of a depressed person taking their own life. The fact that this was a highly educated man , with a wife and family that cared for him, with a high-profile profession dedicated to representing the oppressed, adds to the touching nature of the case. How could such a person regard his life as a failure unworthy of preservation. How could an event so long ago that had resulted in him being expelled from one of the most prestigious American schools, caused such trauma, that it remained with him for the rest of his life, and likely contributed to his death? What could have been so bad that in his view had he admitted to it, in the words of his psychiatrist "he was convinced he would be “banished from the world” if he did, and that he felt “caught between the devil and the deep blue sea”"? That aspect remains a mystery to all but his immediate family.

But in addition to the central psychological features, it is reasonable to analyse the secondary factors surrounding the sad event. Did they contribute in any way to his premature demise and are there any lessons to be learnt? We are at a stage in history in the West, when we have never been more affected by damaging psychological disorders or taken more drugs to control them, issued by GP's and hospitals. In America it is recorded that “nearly 52 percent of deaths were related to prescription drugs and across the country, 44,000 people died from drug overdoses in 2013, more than double the number in 1999.” (11) In Britain the total number of prescriptions (excluding dressing and appliances) has almost doubled from circa 661 million in 2000 and 1,239 in 2014. (12) The number of antidepressants given to patients in England has doubled in a decade. In 2015 there were 61m such drugs prescribed and dispensed outside of hospitals. They are used to treat clinical depression as well as other conditions such as generalised anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder and panic attacks.(13) Yet despite this we seem no happier, indeed there is evidence to suggest it may make matters worse. An analysis of 70 trials of the most common antidepressants - involving more than 18,000 people - found they doubled the risk of suicide and aggressive behaviour in under 18s. (14) Both society and the medical profession needs to be re-educated in this area.

There is little doubt in just this one isolated case, it may well have been a factor linked to what appears to be a general apathetic approach to the dangers. Whether others behind the scenes had in the past contributed to the condition or encouraged or facilitated the solution is impossible on the available evidence to say. The fact that John Jones QC, represented Julian Assange, a person that elements of the American political establishment have made clear it would like to assassinate, may in fact have no bearing on his unfortunate and premature demise. However we may be sure that 'a cause un-looked for, will never be found', or per the more succinct aphorism, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". END.

REFERENCES

1.  https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jun/19/angry-julian-assange-starts-fifth-year-living-in-ecuadors-london-embassy

2.  http://www.inspiretochangeworld.com/2016/07/us-government-calls-assassination-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange/

3. http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/qc_who_worked_on_julian_assange_case_jumped_in_front_of_west_hampstead_train_after_being_allowed_out_of_private_hospital_1_4664571

4.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanilla_Sky

5.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

6'  http://www.conspiracyschool.com/blog/computers-artificial-intelligence-and-all-seeing-eye    
Phillips Exeter Academy: "A leading representative of this trend, who coined the term “personal computer,” was Stewart Brand, MK-Ultra agent and founder of the influential Whole Earth Catalogue. Before studying biology at Stanford University, Brand attended Phillips Exeter Academy, a prestigious American private prep school in New Hampshire, one of the oldest secondary schools in the US. The Economist described the school as belonging to “an elite tier of private schools" in Britain and America that counts Eton and Harrow in its ranks. Exeter has a long list of famous former students, including Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, novelist John Irving and Dan Brown, author of The Da Vinci Code and the Masonic-inspired The Lost Symbol."

7.  http://www.doughtystreet.co.uk/

8.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clonazepam

9.  http://davidhealy.org/left-hanging-suicide-in-bridgend/:
A website antidepaware was recently set up to track deaths by suicide or misadventure or related that are related to antidepressants. It has logged over 1600 UK suicides involving antidepressants of which 43% were recorded as suicides by the coroner, 26% as narrative verdicts, 19% as open verdicts, 5% as death by misadventure and 7% as accidental.

10. http://www.nightingalehospital.co.uk/specialist/dr-stephen-pereira/

11. https://naturalsociety.com/prescriptions-drugs-now-the-leading-cause-of-death-by-overdose/

12. http://www.abpi.org.uk/industry-info/knowledge-hub/medicines/Pages/community-prescribing.aspx

13. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jul/05/antidepressant-prescriptions-in-england-double-in-a-decade

14. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/14/antidepressants-can-raise-the-risk-of-suicide-biggest-ever-revie/

Sunday, 29 April 2018

Port Arthur Massacre: Querulous in

Question?

An Open Letter to Dr Paul Mullen Regarding Martin Bryant *

by Mary Maxwell
To Paul Mullen, Psychiatrist and “Chief of Forensic Psychiatry at Monash University.”
I was shocked to see, when perusing a 2006 article in The Age, that you told that newspaper that Dunblane was the trigger point for Port Arthur.
What? What are you talking about? How could you say that in 2006, completely contradicting what you presented to the DPP in 1996?
Dunblane
The Age article, dated March 29, 2006, is entitled “Shedding Light on the Port Arthur Killer.” (O Gorrrd.) The reporter quotes you as saying:
“He [Martin Bryant] followed Dunblane. His planning started with Dunblane. Before that he was thinking about suicide, but Dunblane and the early portrayal of the killer, Thomas Hamilton, changed everything.”
You know that is not true, Dr Mullen. Did you even write it, or did the media furnish it from their endless stock of ideas to deceive the public? The goal of the real murderers is to persuade us that the real Martin Bryant was at Port Arthur on April 28, 1996. No he was not. You know he was not.
In 1996 you offered a different bunch of misstatements. Have you no conscience?
In the official court case, R v Bryant we see your statement:
“I have prepared this report at the request of Mr Bryant’s legal representative, Mr John Avery. It is based on interview conducted on the 4 May 1996 at the Royal Hobart Hospital, lasting in total some 3 1/2 hours. In addition I had access to extensive documentation.”
Here is your description of your talk with Martin, Beginning on page 361 of the DPP’s transcript (as presented to the Court in November 1996):
“The enormity of Mr Bryant’s crimes call out for some explanation equally dramatic and extraordinary. It is not to be wondered at that the media have either attempted to portray Mr Bryant as afflicted by a dramatic mental illness, such as schizophrenia, or to be some kind of evil genius. In my opinion the origins of this terrible tragedy are not to be found in a single dramatic and sufficient cause, but in the interaction and combination of a range of influences and events. We may never know fully the intentions and state of mind which led to the killings, but a number of contributions are apparent.”
Dr Mullen you may not know “the intentions which led to the killings”, but they certainly were not Bryant’s intentions. They were the intentions of the actual murderers, not some poor patsy.
I continue the quote:
“Mr Bryant is an intellectually limited man who from early childhood showed marked impairment in his capacity to cope with interpersonal and social relationships. He responded to frustrations with aggression towards others and towards property. From an early age his behaviour was characterised by an unfortunate tendency to take delight in the discomfort of others and in the tormenting of people and creatures weaker than himself. This probably reflected in part the struggles of a child who felt buffeted and helpless in the face of the demands of the world and who sought to gain some sense of power, and restore some sense of self-esteem, through ridiculing and hurting others.” [all emphasis in this article is by me, MM]
What’s Your Source?
That is not true. What record of his childhood are you reading from? You did not interview his mother or sister. Whom did he ridicule? From what we see in the two lengthy interviews with Martin – by police on July 4, 1996 and by John Avery in October 1996 — there is no tone of ridicule. No indication that he wanted to hurt others, rather the opposite. He even mentioned that he does not do practice-shooting with glass bottles in case the broken glass would hurt an animal’s foot.
So who are you to tell the Court that this is a personality feature of Martin. Did he ridicule anyone while he was being interviewed by you? Did he strike you as the ridiculing type? I’ll bet not.
You opine, in a sympathetic-sounding way:
“Mr Bryant received considerable support from his father and there are indications in the record during his later adolescence that a degree of stability and more effective social integration was beginning to emerge in this young man. The relationship with Ms Harvey for all its eccentric features probably added to Mr Bryant’s increasing sense of having some place in the world. The death first of Ms Harvey and then the suicide of his father stripped away from Mr Bryant the two main sources of support and stability in his life.”
Well, it would wouldn’t it. By the way do you know that a cop named Phil Pyke told the world that when Martin heard of his Dad’s death he laughed. Of course that cop can say anything, as there is no chance given to Martin to refute anything.
By the way, you must be aware from the publication in The Bulletin in April 2006 that Martin told his lawyer, John Avery, that two doctors at Risdon were trying to brainwash him into not having a trial. Who were those two? They have been disguised in the transcript by Avery as Dr B and Dr D. When you heard of it, did you rush to find out? One of them could be Dr Ian Sale.
Schizo
It looks like your assignment from Avery in 1996 was to make sure no one could claim that the 29 year-old Bryant was unfit to stand trial. To that end you brought up the reference to schizophrenia — to rule it out. I quote you:
“In February 1984 Mr Bryant was assessed by a very experienced clinical psychiatrist, Dr Cunningham-Dax. This assessment was initiated to consider Mr Bryant’s eligibility for a disability pension. Dr Cunningham-Dax stated that Mr Bryant was intellectually handicapped and personality disordered. He also raised the possibility that he might be developing an illness of a schizophrenic type.
“On the basis of this report and subsequent assessments which relied upon it, Mr Bryant was granted a disability pension. There are subsequent references to Mr Bryant having a schizophrenic illness and of being a paranoid schizophrenic in the records of Dr Mather (December 1991) and Dr P M McCartney (December 1991). These diagnostic formulations, it transpired, were not the results of the doctors own conclusions, but based on the report of Mr Bryant’s mother that he had been diagnosed by Dr Cunningham-Dax as suffering from this illness.”
What? A doctor makes a “diagnostic formulation” based on what a mother said a doctor said? Hello? You know no doctor ever does that. He or she would look at the records and examine the patient. This is all getting to be absurd.
Not So Freudian Slip
At one point (this is kind of funny) you made a slip. The judge of course could have ordered that the record not show it but Justice William Cox did not object and needless to say the ‘defense” lawyer John Avery said noting. I quote you:
“[Martin] described his pleasure in life as watching the television, music and killing. – sorry, I’ll reread that. “Mr Bryant described his pleasure in life as watching the television, music and drinking. The music that he most favoured was the sound track of the Lion King and records made by Cliff Richard. On direct questioning he acknowledged that he spent a considerable amount of time watching videos and going to the pictures.”
Your Mike Willessee Chatter
Now for the 2016 “twentieth anniversary” TV show hosted by Mike Willessee. You said of Bryant:
“He wanted to be seen as powerful and evil. Some of the early news coverage which portrayed him as demonic was exactly what he wanted — delighted him.”
Ahem, did he say to you “Dr Mullen, the news coverage delighted me?” Did he say that at your one-and-only meeting with him, dated May 4 – five days after his burns? Martin claims he was not allowed to see TV or read papers – and that hospital personnel were not allowed to tell him what the Port Arthur massacre was all about.
So how did you know he was delighted? Do you have ESP?
What about My Querulousness?
I see from Pubmed that you have written about those of us who go to court to seek redress. I quote you:
“Querulous paranoia was once of considerable clinical and academic interest in psychiatry. Over the last 40 years, however, it has virtually disappeared from the professional landscape. This decline occurred [when folks were] asserting their individual rights through the pursuit of claims and grievances …. through which they seek their vision of justice”.
Their vision? Is “due process” a personal hallucination? I continue:
“This article examines querulous behaviour in the vexatious litigant …. The phenomenological and nosological issues [diagnosis] are outlined and the risks of the emergence of threatening and violent behaviour is emphasized.
“Threats should not be ignored, for a variety of reasons. Approaches to managing querulous behaviour in the courts and the complaint organizations are discussed …Those caught up in a querulous pursuit of their notion of justice are amenable to management that can ameliorate their suffering and reduce the disruption they create.”
Just simply Wow.
Aramoana
Finally, but you knew I was coming to this, Doctor? Aramoana, New Zealand. The killing spree by David Grey, at which Michael Dyson handled the SOG response. You handled the psychiatry. So, everybody wants to know: why were you living in Aramoana of all places, a nice, cosmopolitan Melburnian like You?
People are dying to know. I’m waiting to see what you can come up with. Maybe an elderly aunt asked you to visit or something? Maybe you study a particular species of conch native to the area?
As recently as August 12, 2015 the Canberra Times recounted your glories:
“He interviewed Martin Bryant, the man who shot 35 people dead in the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, and Hoddle Street mass murderer Julian Knight, who he more recently assessed as being unlikely to repeat the random shooting spree that killed seven in Melbourne in 1987. He worked on the Snowtown​ murders in the 1990s, also known as the bodies-in-barrels case, which has been described as Australia’s worst serial killings. [They forgot Aramoana.]
“Professor Mullen has also worked as an expert assessor for the US Army defence team acting for former Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks, and assessed Bali nine pair Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran years before their execution.”
What was the point of an Australian shrink studying prisoners caught in the Indonesian justice system? And what did you do at Chelmsford?
“The court appointed [Mullen] as its expert in the Chelmsford Hospital medical negligence case, the largest of its kind to date, which sued for the devastating use of electroconvulsive and deep-sleep therapy on patients with mental illness.”
Never mind I don’t want to know.
–Mary Maxwell is an elderly querulous American Australian with a bee in her bonnet about the continued incarceration of a patsy in Oz, Martin Bryant, and a patsy in US: Jahar Tsarnaev.


Wednesday, 20 January 2021

 Is Britain's nation Covid neurotic or psychotic?


https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&sxsrf=ALeKk03rv0Z7fPLoR1x_-ToEW6IVL5yOYA:1611181962585&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=psychotic+images&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwilmrHEyKvuAhWJTsAKHYWUDXEQ7Al6BAgCEAM&biw=1280&bih=881#imgrc=BMUaTnChlLT7nM

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyQhqoFYPTqDea9TyrqMhrQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_RXZ1ZQDv


The only difference between a Neurotic and a Psychotic they say, is that a "Neurotic builds castles in the sky but a Psychotic lives in them."  It is hard to tell whether the British Nation, leaving aside all the others, has gone neurotic or psychotic over Covid 19 ad nauseam.

The neurosis is everywhere to see. The detour of pedestrians. The wearing of masks in the open air. The wearing of two masks. The masks on children. The excessive use of anti-biotic hand sprays (notice anti-BIOTIC useless against viruses) The fear of going out, of shaking hands. etc. etc.

How about the Psychotic? Well the introduction of "Do not resuscitate" may well fall into that category, as might the refusal to allow family members to visit dying relatives or critically ill children. Or perhaps that should just be categorised as utterly insensitive bureaucratic mania?

How can we regard the devastating consequences of Government policy on the economy, on business, on people's lives, or the very real consequences on physical and mental health other than Psychotic? The number of people waiting more than twelve months for medical and surgical interventions has apparently grown from a little over a thousand to more than a hundred and thirty thousand. Those diagnosed with life threatening cancers are having to wait longer than they should when speed of treatment is fundamental to outcome.

This is not only psychotic, it is positively criminally insane as the inordinate numbers of care home deaths proved.  This was not the result of a virus, but of administrative policy that withdrew care and treatment from the vulnerable.

And what of crime and punishment? Was the response by police and courts neurotic or psychotic? Whilst losing 150,000 records of criminals, and unable to quell the mounting numbers of crimes and frauds, including an epidemic of street crimes and murders, it was nevertheless able to mount operations with huge numbers of police to prevent peaceful demonstrations, often demonstrating a level of aggression and violence against even the elderly. If this was not psychotic, what is? 

Arresting people in Supermarkets for not wearing a mask, although the law allows it; bursting into people's homes to check on whether there was a party going on; arresting people for going for a walk or sitting on a park bench too long, how can you classify these actions other than psychotic besides being an infringement of basic human freedoms. Significantly both Home Secretary and Minister of Heath support these outrageous and insane actions by the police. Do you need to be insane to support insanity? Is Government itself suffering from individual and corporate Neurosis or Psychosis. Should it by rights be Certified?


COVID THE PSYCOPATH!


A WHO team is currently in China with the objective of discovering the source of the SARS Cov-2 outbreak in Wuhan. Should be classify this as Neurotic or Psychotic, given that the genesis of the RNA entity is already clear? Is it just another example of 'Distraction' from the documented reality: that this was a laboratory developed and copyrighted formula in the United States Fort Detrick in Maryland, USA, before legislation required it to transfer to Wuhan, still funded by the American CDC. 

There is little doubt that it was developed as a biological weapon and deployed just in time for the run-up to the American Presidential election, where it was a critical factor in the defeat of President Trump. Fauci, who holds the copyright to the virus, was an obvious actor in this Deep State operation, that has had the desired effect in a much wider political and economic 'reframing'.

Sceptics of this story line should note that Fort Kendrick figured large in the anthrax contaminated parcel scare following 9/11, itself a criminal fraud of the highest and most psychotic order. Britain's equivalent is of course Porton Down in Wiltshire. It is interesting to speculate how much is known in that establishment or what part it has played in the identification of the SARS Cov-2 agent and the policy that has flowed from it. No doubt it is up to speed. It is noteworthy that the quarantined-at-Windsor Queen of England's first official visits was to Porton Down to check out progress, nor that Porton Down figured large in the alleged Novichok poisoning incident in Salisbury.  https://www.royal.uk/queen-and-duke-cambridge-visit-porton-down

Interestingly, MI6's agent, Christopher Steele links both the Russia gate allegations against Trump and the Salisbury Novichok incident. Some might think this pushes a coincidence explanation to breaking point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Steele

We are all aware that using fear to ensure compliance is a psychotic trait, as is the inability to feel the suffering of others. Yes 'fear' was the stated objective of government to ensure compliance with its crazy 'lock-down' rules, accompanied with a lack of empathy for the personal suffering and anxiety they would cause. Old people isolated, the sick dying alone, children terrified, families separated.

The government claimed it was all 'science led', yet the body reputedly setting the agenda and stoking the fear, got it hopelessly wrong. So called SAGE or the "Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies" has lots of people attending its meetings but rather strangely "Permission to publish names was requested from all participants. Those who did not give permission have not been named."  Why would someone not wish to be named on such a body?

At the meeting of the 22nd January, 2020 the following attended: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/888767/S0369_Precautionary_SAGE_meeting_on_Wuhan_Coronavirus__WN-CoV__.pdf 

Attendees Scientific experts: Patrick Vallance (GCSA), Chris Whitty (CMO), Charlotte Watts (CSA DfID), Jonathan Van Tam (Deputy CMO), Neil Ferguson (Imperial), Carole Mundell (CSA FCO), Peter Horby (Oxford), Christine Middlemiss (CVO DEFRA), James Rubin (King's College), Cathy Roth (DFID), Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome), Phil Blythe (CSA DfT), Pasi Penttinen (ECDC), David Lalloo (LSHTM), Maria Zambon (PHE), Ben Killingley (UCL), John Edmunds (LSTHM), Jim McMenamin (Health Protection Scotland). Observers and Government officials: Rupert Shute (dCSA HO), Kavitha Kishen (DfT), Stuart Wainwright (GoS), Tasha Grant (CCS), Samantha Harris (GoS).

It should be noted that the Imperial College projection of deaths proved wildly overstated and Neil Furguson its representative, was sacked in consequence. He appears to have been subsequently reinstated into the government fold of advisors.

It can readily be acknowledged that behaviour is a product of mental activity. It is the summation of knowledge, attitudes and skills acquired by virtue of genetic make-up, environmental influences and personal choice from cognitive reasoning. It follows therefore the way to change any of these attributes, the mind is the focus and target, whether individually or en masse.

Both human behaviour and mental activity have been studied thoroughly in the last one hundred years. Both psychology and psychiatry have received enormous attention, not least by secret agencies of the state. The early work on 'brain washing', using Lysergic acid diethylamide, better known as LSD or 'Acid' by the CIA and no doubt others, has become notorious. But experiments with animals came earlier. Pavlov's dog and Skinner's rats have become notorious. By virtue of psychoanalysis, the study of damaged brains, increasingly sophisticated experiments and cerebral diagnostic machines, the effects of different chemical compounds, besides neurosurgery itself, gradually revealed more and more secrets of this incredible organ and with it the power to influence and control it.

Make no mistake, what we are witnessing in this 'international covid crisis', is not only the engineering of a biologic threat, but also a mass psychological operation to make its intended purpose complete. All the knowledge gained from the relatively new sciences of psychology and psychiatry, of all the social surveys, statistics and understanding of social networks and factor influencing persuasion, have been put to use to obvious effect.

The concept of 'carrot and stick' in human motivation and attitude is well known. In common with all animals, humans yearn for praise, reward - both practical and psychological - and acceptance. It is said to love and be loved is the chief human goal whether genuine or contrived. Conversely animals avoid pain, disappointment and failure and humans are no exception to the general rule. Peer group pressure is enormously power to ensure compliance even if it conflicts with firmly held moral principles. There is of course a huge amount of research material to support these assertions. 

However the important point is that the well understood arsenal of techniques have been applied during the Covid episode to ensure compliance with predetermined behavioural objects, totally disconnected from those stated. As such, either wittingly or unwittingly, Governments have been complicit in a fraudulent propaganda exercise to change patterns of behaviour and thought, that have practically no relationship to the sated objective of preventing disease or even 'protecting the NHS'. These are merely the powerful tools of mass mind and behavioural  manipulation. As has been long stated, there is a thin line between 'Health Education' and 'Societal Propaganda'.

The 'Carrot and Stick' approach is not difficult to recognise but it is amazing how little awareness people have of being subject to it. The NHS has an almost mythical place in the hearts of the British public. Some say it has taken the place of religion and the Church of England. Politicians know this, so it is no surprise that 'protecting the NHS' was adopted as a major slogan, however ludicrous it is on examination. Protecting a person's health is one thing; protecting an organisation is quite another. At no point has the NHS been in danger of collapse. In any event, given the huge sums thrown at utterly failed 'track and trace', testing, masks, advertising and yes even vaccination, the resources were obviously available to meet any demand placed upon it. The whole point of a national health service is that it is capable to meet the demands placed on it. If there was a shortage of hospitals, beds, staff or equipment, it is because government planned it, not that there was a flu virus going around.

So the powerful 'love' of the NHS was deployed to get the behavioural objectives identified. But it was also linked to another powerful behavioural influencer, namely the Thursday night banging event - for want of a better description - when everybody up and down the land was encouraged to bang the drum for nation health staff. Peer group pressure in operation, making people feel good, a classic 'carrot' device to get people to accept a draconian 'stay ay home' curfew. Having achieved its purpose, it notably hasn't been repeated which rather ays it all.

Other hugely expensive 'carrots' have been employed. Paying 80% of wages; VAT and other tax breaks; subsidised meals; payments to business for loss of trade, etc etc.  This is obviously unsustainable in the short term and will have to be paid for in the long, but again it undoubtedly helped to ensure compliance.  No doubt 'SAGE' will have advised the government, that once 'norms of behaviour' AKA 'habits' have been established, you can withdraw the measures that created them. People wear masks outside, although this is not required, and will probably continue to do so even when the threat is officially removed (should that day ever arrive) as with other behavioural changes like standing apart and not shaking hands, for example.

I am told there are more people with a psychology background on SAGE than medical or statistical. I haven't checked out whether this is true but I could certainly believe it. Sage hase been the principle element in leading government and nation down a fundamentally erroneous and deadly path.

So having briefly considered the 'carrots', how about the 'sticks'?




https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopolitics/55-americans-have-died-following-covid-vaccination-norway-deaths-rise-to-29/?fbclid=IwAR13sLOA-M5a0eP4xjKcvKNneHMoKCvxVVUKcsUTDU05UT7QyfqnrErf3Bc


And there's more....
FROM THE CDC; 3,150 people vaccinated in ONE DAY are "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work" after vaccination.
This is a massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work after having the Pfizer vaccine.
Portuguese health worker, 41, dies two days after getting the Pfizer covid vaccine as her father says he 'wants answers'
Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving COVID-19 vaccine
Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
Wife of 'perfectly healthy' Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to shot.
75-year-old Israeli man dies 2 hours after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
Death of Swiss man after Pfizer vaccine.
88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being vaccinated.
Thousands negatively affected after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
Hospital worker with no prior allergies in intensive care with severe reaction after Pfizer Covid vaccine.
4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after taking Pfizer Covid-19 jab, prompting FDA to recommend ‘surveillance for cases’.
Investigation launched as 2 people die in Norway nursing home days after receiving Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.
Hundreds Sent to Emergency Room After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines
U.S. officials report more severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions.
COVID-19: Single vaccine dose leads to 'greater risk' from new coronavirus variants, South African experts warn
CDC reveals at least 21 Americans have suffered life threatening allergic reactions to Pfizer's COVID vaccine
Woman experiences side effects of COVID-19 vaccine
COVID Vaccine Side Effects More Common After 2nd Dose.
Bulgaria Reports 4 Cases Of Side Effects From Pfizer Covid Vaccine.
Two NHS workers suffer allergic reaction to Pfizer vaccine.
~forwarded from Dr Tenpenny



* https://www.royal.uk/queen-and-duke-cambridge-visit-porton-down