The murder of Charlie Kirk.
A stinking can of worms.
7.1.2026: Candice Owens published not-seen-before images from the rear of Charlie Kirk. It reaffirms what I have pointed out many times from the first. The physics of his head and body movement post-shot, points to the kinetic energy coming from his right. Importantly it also disproves the alleged bullet from the front, but then everybody, except it would seem the police, FBI and Utah prosecuting authorities, have known this all along. The stated damage to his neck vertebrae and what I believe was the exit wound to the front left side of his neck, are consistent with a bullet - or other projectile - coming from an elevated location to his right. It may even be that the image published by Owens, Ian Carrol, Baron Coleman and here by 'Coach Colin' (See first screen shot below) may give evidence of the entry point. You may even be able to see it.
Still from video:
Coleman and Carrol also discuss what the latter discovered on three frames of another video immediately following the shot. No one is sure what it was/is, though the timing suggests it might be connected. The object appears to be falling from the ceiling of the awning, although whether this followed an initial trajectory not caught on camera is not ruled out. What if this was in fact a miniature explosive device? Its location cerainly roughly fits the trajectory already described and there appears to be disintegration and some sort of vapour or smoke co-terminous with the shot that is highly coincidental or significant.
In my humble opinion, there are two plausble reasons why certain powerful individuals decided Charlie Kirk had to be eliminated - permanently : one, because he no longer supported the outrageous and inhumane policies of the America/Israel Zionist alliance; and two because Charlie had stated the need for, and intended to implement, a 'doge'-style audit of the 'TPUSA' organisation.
There undoubtedly would have been additional and subsidiary motivational and influencing factors on those who knowingly or naively, majorly or minorly, were necessary to carry through the plot, the most likely being financial reward, although more esoteric reasons may have been involved. Individuals probably foresaw a real threat to their positions, reputations and finances if the truth was revealed. Others may have held carefully disguised animosities, disagreements, loyalties or even loves.
But of this I am sure: Kirk was NOT killed because the putative killer was offended by his opinions on tran-sexuals or homosexuals despite the fact that the whole current Utah prosecution case rests on this preposterous assertion or the claimed 'evidence' surrounding it. As I have argued from the outset, not only is the accused Tyler Robinson not guilty as charged, It is a PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY that he could be.
The reasons for this opinion have been rehearsed ad nauseam. Apart from the unblemished character of their chosen defendant, there is nothing of substance besides alleged video images and clearly fabricated evidence, that links him to the crime. Even Agatha Christie would have been ashamed to have come up with such a plot. Whoever, in the bowels of the CIA, Mossad or whatever came up with it should be sacked for professional incompetence and ignorance of the 'whodunnit' genre.
Talking of incompetence, before charging an obviously innocent man, wouldn't it have been a good idea if whoever was in charge of the investigation, had tried to replicate the scenario as suggested?
Carrying a dismantled WW1 rifle over that distance; reassembling it on the roof with the aid of an abandoned screw-driver; taking just one shot from 140 yards without a scope or any other adjustment; managing a direct hit of a person's neck; disassembling the rifle and placing it in some sort of fabric sack; run across the roof with it and make an athletic and precipitous descent from the building without any evidence of a rifle on camera; make his escape after first reassembling the rifle - this time without even a screw-driver - and leaving it behind in a preordained location, that had just happened to have been Google-searched from Israeli IP addresses one month previously; and all within the stated time parameters! And I have not even referreded to the physical impossibility of matching the wound of the victim to the alleged weapon, bullet and trajectory, leaving aside the novice shooter.
If the prosecutors had tried and failed to replicate it, even with a trained professional, the prosecution of Tyler Robinson could never have even been started. The prosecution and trial is obviously a shameful charade and farago of lies and deception. If there was any justice in the State of Utah, it would have already been abandoned on application of the defence.
But of greater significance is the fact that whilst the wrong man is being tried for a crime he could not have committed at great public expense, the true culprits and circumstances are not even being investigated by either FBI or police, both of whom must be fully aware they have the wrong man and the wrong explanation. This means all those involved in the plot and execution of the heinous deed get a free pass and enabled to carry out similar crimes unmolested.
It must also mean that of necessity, those in charge of the investigation and prosecution locally and nationally are knowingly and intentionally implicated in a fraud of the worst kind: charging an innocent man with a murder he could not have committed and even seeking the death penalty for it whilst knowingly not pursuing the true causes and felons. There could be no surer sign of an utterly corrupt institutional and political system.
It is darkly ironic that an organisation - 'Turning Point USA' - ostensibly laying claim to 'traditional Christian values', should be so thoroughly submerged in the circumstances of Charley's death and other highly questionable, financial dealings. If multiple shell companies handling dubious millions via literally a one foot square metal PO box in a Mall building, and individuals aquiring million dollar properties from nowhere does not call for for proper auditing, what does? Are the supporters of TPUSA so brainwashed by glamour and rhetoric that they do not question and demand to know where their millions have been spent and to what purpose. If I was one of them I would not donate another penny until I knew.
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JufoJlPxQDk
Without putting too fine a point upon it, the TPUSA organisation appears to me to be a total and cynical sham, taking advantage of gullible people's genuine desire for truth and revival. Their faith and trust has been betrayed in the worst way imaginable.
3.1.2025: Dear C., As you well know, I am sceptical about much that occurs in the world, particularly of events that get massive mainstraem attention - and for that matter those that don't ! Notice how Gaza has ceased to be an issue despite the on-going barbarous israeli action? Also we have never really been informed about the bloody details of the Ukraine war, only a sanitized version of it and all its corrupt underpinnings. Like you, I immediately questioned the three incidents you referred to. I have written several articles on Kirk (you may have seen), have been fiddling with Bondi since it happened, and I certainly agree with you it appears a likely secret Israeli operation. The time the father and son combo spent in 'an hotel bedroom' in the Phillipines seems particularly suspicious given that country's track record both as to air mysteries and condemnation of Israel. Coincidentally (?) exactly either side of it, two high profile killings in America at Brown and MIT by the same man, found dead elsewhere, though the motivation and travel details of the alleged killer have never been explained. Conveniently the Portugese national shot himself and was found with two guns, matching the two incidents miles apart. Then we have the November arrest in Germany of an alleged Hamas plotter, and the discovery of a weapons stash in Austria a month later, five years almost the day of an earlier 'islamic' terrorist event there. As to Kirk, I argued from the beginning that the suggested explanation was ludicrous - even more so than ever, yet the farcical trial of Tyler Robinson (note the strange confluence of surname with Israel's asset in Britain) continues. Robinson was clearly used as a Patsy but not in the way described. Note his parents are theoreticall eligable for the $1.15 reward money a million of which came from jewish donors! (Quote: "Alex Bruzewicz, who advised former President Donald Trump on youth outreach and communication, and conservative activist Robby Starbuck each pledged $25,000. Later, Bill Ackman, a Wall Street hedge fund billionaire who supported Trump in the last election, committed $1 million, swelling the reward to $1.15 million.") Bill Ackman also donated A$999,999 (!) to the Bondi pot. What a coincidence? Earlier he withdrew his support from Kirk when he refused to take orders from Israel and jewish interests. Note How bizarre is that? However the very public murder of Kirk, which from multiple eye witness reports of blood spurting from the neck wound I do believe is genuine, is causing a major problem for TPUSA, the republican Party, the State prosecution authorities and the shambolic FBI, which they all desperately want to go away. Was that one of the reasons for the Bondi attack? I think the reason for Kirk's assassination was essentially two fold as has been widely suggested : one, the shift from supporting Israel's violence; and two the threat of a 'doge-style' audit. More has come out recently regarding the utter financial corruption linked to jewish donated funds and the people running it in that ostensibly 'Judaeo/Christian' organisation. As to the British position in all this 'anti-semitic' propaganda nonsense the less said the better. We obviously had our Manchester moment on the 2nd October. The common factor in all of these incidents: increased control of the internet, free speech and demonstration, plus further gun and 'foreigner' control in America, Europe and now Australia. Surprise, surprise. In Dijon??? You must be mustard. LOL Have a good new year. Regards, Tim.
The following FORENSIC ANALYSIS from: Wolves and finance 'SHOCKING: Turning Point fraud GETS WORSE' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XzKg99qn-4
The.source states she’s a TPUSA employee. They state that every time Erika got involved with a TPUSA event that it “felt off”. This being because people would get pulled from their “post” for no good reason, replaced with names that no one recognized. She says she wasn’t loud about these actions but that these people just appeared. These people would hover, take notes, and make adjustments. The source states they’d do subtle things like asking for background checks on cleared people, rerouting internal communications through temporary systems no one could verify, and requesting access to lists of attending people that they really didn’t need for their assigned job.
Then she talks about the UVU event…
She states that all of this spiraled at UVU. She said it was supposed to be a normal day but things started happening like scheduled changing the day of, supplies missing, people told conflicting things, and that they were running in circles trying to hold it together. She states the same new faces (mentioned earlier, seemingly hires of Erika Kirk but the longtime staff were unfamiliar with) were everywhere. She states they were always nearby, always listening.
She states that what most people don’t realize is that Erika was acting as CEO before Charlie ever died. She was giving orders, making executive calls, and speaking for the organization in ways that made everyone uncomfortable. The source states that Charlie would attempt to intervene and she’d just talk over him ‘like he didn’t even matter anymore’.
The source states that when Erika Kirk was announced CEO that everyone within knew what was happening. Apparently Charlie was finding things out about Erika months before he died. About her family, the money, the deep state ties, and the things connected to her charities & offshore accounts.
Eventually it’s said that Charlie told Erika to take a step back and Erika said “over my dead body”
The source states she’s coming out about this so history doesn’t rewrite her as a saint
During the interview, Snow was direct about his lack of affi ..
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/126241746.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_ca
Charlie Kirk murder: Suspicious characters.
: Here's a compilation of Charlie Kirk's staffs' anomalous and suspicious behavior in the minutes after Kirk was assassinated:
0:07 Terryl Farnsworth (Audio/Video guy/Visual Impulse LLC) runs to camera position before Charlie even hits the ground to film Charlie being dragged out
0:39 Terryl Farnsworth declares Charlie Kirk as d3ad minutes after before anyone knows it
0:43 Terryl Farnsworth climbs on Charlie's bloody chair to remove the closest behind camera aimed at Charlie during the sh00ting without police securing or cataloging it 3 minutes after the shooting
1:01 Terryl Farnsworth hands the SD cards from the camera off to Phillip Goldsberry (Audio/Video guy) behind the tent, who then leaves the scene with it.
1:20 9 minutes after the shooting, with a perimeter established and people pushed 30 yards back away from the crime scene, Terryl Farnsworth removes the SD card from the camera closest facing Charlie
2:04 Charlie's photographer (Andrew Feraci) and videographer (name unknown) hear the gunshot and immediately turn away from Charlie to focus on where he will be carried out. They do not react to the shooting at all other than to move into position.
2:19 Cooper Brown (TP USA volunteer) physically interrupts (assaults?) student witness who was interviewing just after the shooting as he described where he heard the shot from.
2:30 Mikey McCoy (Kirk's Chief of Staff) calmy and immediately gets on the phone and casually starts walking away before Kirk even hits the ground.
These anomalies deserve answers.
Charlie deserves justice.
So far, Mitch has not recanted.
2. The accused prove Mitch wrong:
So far, the accused have not proven him wrong (With the *possible* exception of Mark Amodei. But even 1 of 4 alleged doesn't falsify the other 3)
3. More facts or witnesses continue to come out that confirm one way or the other:
So far, no evidence has been presented that falsifies the verifiable aspects of Mitch's claims, while other evidence has emerged that he was indeed on base. No other witnesses have come forward.
I'm keen to get to the truth one way or another, just as everyone else is. And just like everyone else, I'm basically a hostage to one or more of those 3 remedies. I don't like that, but it is what it is.
I'm not married to Fort Huachuca and my own investigation doesn't hinge on it one way or another. Fort Huachuca allegations being false or fake don't falsify other aspects and avenues of this investigation.
But it's either a massive distraction or a massive component. At this point, the whole thing has gotten so big, we need to know one way or the other. Can't be swept under the rug or ignored. And smear campaigns from either side are irrelevant. If Mitch is lying or mistaken, the quickest way to discredit him and put this to bed is for Brian Harpole, Erika Kirk, and Cabot Phillips to nuke him with verifiable receipts.
And before anyone says, "Why should they dignify any of this with a response?!": Harpole and Kirk have both already provided *some* receipts, but unfortunately what they've provided doesn't falsify Mitch's allegations completely. So since they've already dignified it by responding with some receipts, I don't think it's too much to ask that they finish the job with some final receipts.
Full disclosure: My own bias is that I think the most likely explanation is that he was indeed on base and is either misremembering, confusing faces, or seeking attention for some other reason. But, the longer this drags out, and the more that non-debunking receipts keep being issued, the more likely it becomes, IMO. I don't make the rules.
Again, I'm basically relying upon either Mitch or Harpole/Kirk/Phillips for the truth. It's unfortunate that it has to be this way, but as just one guy without subpoena power or limitless investigative resources, I don't have other options. And that puts me in the same boat as almost everyone else.