Thursday 29 August 2024

 

Starmer’s police-state continues: journalist Sarah Wilkinson arrested ‘for online posts’

https://skwawkbox.org/2024/08/29/starmers-police-state-continues-journalist-sarah-wilkinson-arrested-for-online-posts/

Starmer’s assault on democracy and press freedom intensifies – yet another journalist arrested, with devices seized, after reporting on Gaza genocide


Skwawkbox has warned for years that Keir Starmer, his authoritarian instincts and his closeness to the security services are a grave threat to our democracy and freedom. That threat is now reality and Starmer’s machine is waging war on the press freedom and the public’s right to know that underpin our liberties and what remains of democracy in the UK.

That war has escalated further at around 7.30am today with the arrest at her home of left-wing journalist and human rights activist Sarah Wilkinson, who writes for MENA Uncensored and has reported on Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. According to members of her family, Wilkinson was arrested over ‘online posts’ when nine or ten officers turned up at her home and police seized her electronic devices. Further details are awaited.



The arrest is the latest in a series of state threats and intimidation against journalists who reveal inconvenient information, often in airports so that police can exploit anti-terror laws allowing them to deny access to a lawyer and the right to refuse to answer questions and to withhold device passwords.

Last week, British Grayzone journalist Richard Medhurst was arrested on board as his plane arrived at Heathrow and held for almost twenty-four hours, denied legal access and even water for long periods, while his devices were confiscated. For his reporting on Gaza and on Palestinian resistance he has been charged with support for a proscribed organisation and bailed for three months.


Earlier this year ex-pat British journalist Kit Klarenberg, who has exposed the domestic actions of the UK secret services and British misdeeds abroad, was arrested at Luton airport and suffered similar abuse and seizure.

In December, writer and anti-genocide activist Tony Greenstein was arrested by terror police for a single tweet and was deprived of his electronics for months. Last October, journalist and former ambassador Craig Murray was detained after flying from a ‘Free Assange’ event. His devices were taken and he was forced to hand over passwords.

Starmer, the ‘long-time servant of the British security state‘ who colluded with the US on extraditions, collaborated in so-called ‘opposition’ with the Tory government to remove protections for journalists, to bring in a series of laws moving the UK closer to a police state by protecting undercover agents and their spies from prosecution, widening police powers to prevent and attack protest, and introducing draconian penalties for protesters who cause ‘inconvenience’.

As Labour leader, he has protected abusers and sex pests, has pursued and expelled those who resist or criticise him and has overseen widespread rigging of candidate selections.

As PM he has already begun interfering with the UK judiciary, he has also committed UK funds for war and infamously agreed that Israel has the right to starve the people of Gaza, a clear war crime under international law.

Update: Palestine Action’s Richard Barnard has also been charged today for supposedly ‘supporting a proscribed organisation’ in two speeches.


BREAKING: After a targeted campaign by the zionist lobby, Palestine Action's co-founder Richard Barnard is facing three charges for two speeches. He is accused of supporting a proscribed organisation under the Terrorism Act and encouraging 'criminal activity'.





Tuesday 27 August 2024

 

Hunter-gatherers and biblical theology


Garden of Eden. Johann Wenzel Peter , 19th century

Garden of Eden. Johann Wenzel Peter, 19th century

Biblical scholars debate whether there is a coherent theology running through the Bible, or a ‘Judaeo-Christian tradition’. I think there is. It’s an appeal to hunter-gatherer economics in reaction against agricultural empires.

To make sense of it we have to turn upside-down what my generation were taught to think of as ‘progress’.

https://www.clatworthy.org/2024/08/hunter-gatherers-and-biblical-theology/

The progress story

The story went like this. Once upon a time our ancestors were hunter-gatherers. They had to work really hard to get enough to eat. Then, around 12,000 years ago, they learned agriculture: first the digging stick, then the hoe, then the plough. At each stage there was more food so they didn’t have to work so hard. This was the agricultural revolution. Then, much later again, the industrial revolution. Machines. We created more stuff, and life got easier still.

The regress story

Since the 1960s the progress story has been torn to shreds. Anthropologists, historians and archaeologists have produced detailed evidence showing that our hunter-gatherer ancestors had a more healthy lifestyle and a more healthy diet than anybody since. And they didn’t spend so much time having to work.

When the agricultural revolution arrived, there was indeed more food. Kings commandeered it. They used it to employ soldiers and tax collectors. The farmers who actually grew the food were forced to grow more, and pay it in tax. They had to work longer hours to grow the extra food. Their diet deteriorated, because their range of foods was mainly limited to what they grew. Whereas hunter-gatherers lived in small groups and made sure everybody had enough to eat, in the big agricultural empires some people had huge wealth while others went hungry. At each stage in this development, power and wealth became more unequal.

When the industrial revolution came, steam engines produced machines to be kept running 24 hours a day. The electric light bulb meant people could be made to work after sunset. Mobile phones mean your boss can phone you on holiday.

The problem is not the technologies as such but the misuse of power. The overall trend has been increasing inequality. The main exception was at the end of the Second World War when there was an international movement for greater equality. It lasted for about 30 years.

The beneficiaries of these changes are constantly telling us that life must have been dreadful in the old days before we had modern technology. It’s always possible to point out people who had a dreadful time in the past. You and I would hate to live without the internet and flushing toilets, because this is the way we’ve been brought up. But hundreds of years ago people didn’t spend their time saying ‘Roll on the days of flushing toilets and Windows 11’. They did things differently.

This newer story that inequality and poverty have been increasing, has been developing since the 1960s. It is pretty pesssimistic. Everything is getting worse! We are all doomed!

The variation story

So here comes another story again. Recently scholars have been pointing out that there isn’t just one history, from hunter-gatherers to agriculturists and from agriculturists to industrialists. We are not trapped in that sequence. Different societies have gone in different directions at different times. Some hunter-gatherers have become farmers, farmed for a while, and then gone back to hunting and gathering. Some societies have looked at the next society along, decided they don’t like it, and set about organising themselves in a completely different way. The way societies organise themselves isn’t predetermined; they can make their own decisions, just as British society made a decision at our recent general election.

The biblical story

I see the Bible as one example of this decision to do things differently. In the agricultural empires of the ancient near east the ruling classes demanded taxes from the peasants. When peasants couldn’t pay they would get into debt. When they couldn’t repay their debts they either sold themselves into slavery or ran away, found some unused land and used it to feed their families. One range of hill tops collected so many refugees from debt that they formed themselves into a new nation: Israel.

The story Israel told itself was of prophets denouncing exploitative kings for taxing the farmers; laws restricting the power of kings; and histories denouncing kings for disobeying the laws. They add up to most of the Bible. The texts Jesus knew as his scriptures were reactions against the agricultural empires of Egypt, Babylon and Assyria, reactions trying to preserve the earlier system they still remembered – of small communities where everybody had enough and nobody had too much.

The rulers of the agricultural empires claimed that the gods had created humans to work hard and the king’s job was to punish slackers. The first page of the Bible says the opposite: God has created humans for our own sakes, as a blessing. There is a place for work but also a place for rest and a place for celebration.

This biblical tradition was what Jesus revived. He lived at a time of widespread starvation. By appealing to this tradition he could argue that there is enough for everybody, provided nobody takes too much. We could do with his kind of biblical theology today.

This entry was posted in BibleEconomicsPoliticsTheology and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Hunter-gatherers and biblical theology

  1. N Henderson says:

    Brilliant!

  2. Rose Green says:

    ‘We could do with his kind of biblical theology today.’

    Definitely! Instead we’re told there’s a massive ‘hole’ in public finances and the only way to close it is to give poor people even less – because that worked SOOO well for the Tories – when the number of billionaires has more than doubled in the last 14 years. Charging the very rich a very small amount of their ‘income’ would fill the hole and then some!

  3. Christopher Hall says:

    My understanding has been that the rivalry between Cain and Abel has between the hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists.

Sunday 25 August 2024

 

'LEGS ELEVEN'




So who is he? A nobody!

He spends his hours amongst the trees

Conversant with the birds and bees

Intent on making honey,

From all the wild flowers that abound

On heath or hedge or round the pond

That so far have escaped

The digger and the saw,

He spends his pointless time

In formulating useless rhyme,

Preferring it to connurbation's call.


He's short and fat and called a pratt

So stays well clear of not-so-polite society.

He's awkward when it comes to dance

At discos alone he watches in a trance

Cavorting people hilarious and happy.

For in the moment whilst it lasts

It is indeed the very thing he's not,

So back he goes to ancient plot

To fight the weeds, that with such vigour grow.

And sow some seeds, to hatch some plans,

To smell a rose before the petals fall.


He likes to think but cannot recall

The necessary word or phrase for all

The ideas he would like to entertain;

The Theosaurus always by his side

To help him when the term avoids his memory.

How frustrating can it be

To muddle up the history

Of ancient civilisations, tribes,

That now lay claim to territory?

Whose instincts unconstrained just run amok

Drip red across a bloody dictionary.


Expressionless yet still he feels the pain

Of others far away who cannot speak,

Frustrated by his inability to influence

Those cold and brutal forces, wreathed in smiles.

What is that word again that Freudian-like

The brain refuses to recall?

Ah that is it – 'impotent' – that's what we are,

Witnessing an unmatched horror

But too cowed, intimidated, detatched,

We hide and fail to act or speak -

When to our shame, the very stones cry out.

Thursday 22 August 2024

 

"Bayesian superyacht was ‘virtually unsinkable’, says shipbuilder"



Prosecutors in Termini Imerese, close to where vessel went down on Monday, have opened an investigation

Mike Lynch: The Probability Man