Test

The Long Road?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gu8ZAwaKs8

The Covid Con!

20.6.2024: What you need to realise is that the 'Covid Epidemic' was something quite different from what was stated. It was not a health crisis. Rather it was a creation of the Secret State (for shorthand read CIA) for POLITICAL and FINANCIAL purposes. It ensured the termination of the Trump/Johnson leadership of US/UK political leadership that posed a threat to Deep State priorities. Meanwhile it ensured a huge money transfer (measured in hundreds of billions!) from State to private corporate and personal entities. Individuals were persuaded and coerced to be injected with a dangerous, ineffective substance at no cost. This was also fraudulent because the cost was hidden and deferred to the National Debt that now has to be paid for by public service cuts and/or increases in taxes. The huge additional social and health consequences are increasingly becoming apparent in increased deaths, illness and waiting lists. Of course the government and media have actively been censoring and lying about this, but the truth will eventually out, and those that have told it will be vindicated - sadly too late to prevent the disaster it has been. However if it awakens people to the other international ruses and campaigns, such as CO2, Trans Rights, Controlled Speech, Militarisation of Policing, Supression of Protest, Social Media Censorship beside the promotion of war in Ukraine and Gaza, where similar tactics have been employed, so much the better. veaterecosan.com

Meanwhile in Gaza - Secret Genocide-Supporting Operations

Katharine Hepburn  (Translated from the original Italian on FaceBook via  

Armando Bacco)

 

 

Media hype and military mistakes: The British role in Gaza The failure of the mission to liberate Israeli prisoners of war in Gaza highlighted British and American military involvement, widening Israel's war against Gaza into an international conflict, just as the US and UK did with Ukraine. On June 8, Israeli forces staged a blood-spattered "rescue" operation in the Nuseirat Palestinian refugee camp. The brutal and blunt operation freed four prisoners, killed three others - including a US citizen - and left 274 Palestinians dead and many more injured. The Israeli army also suffered losses, including the death of a senior commander. Although Hamas has offered since October 8 to release prisoners held in Gaza unharmed in exchange for a ceasefire and the total withdrawal of the occupation forces, this operation can only be seen as a costly failure for Israel, part of a broader strategic mistake. The Israeli military has failed to achieve any of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's declared war goals in eight months of conflict, and Tel Aviv's growing international isolation required a dramatic public relations show. Spill it all out Western media eagerly took the bait, widely acclaiming the "heroic" effort. One agency called the fiasco a "miraculous triumph." Another celebrated the "bold" recovery of "heavily guarded" hostages. Photos and biographies of the four freed individuals were prominently circulated. Human interest stories abound. Out of this nauseating deluge, however, the New York Times quietly published a bombshell revelation. British and American intelligence officials and "hostage rescue" specialists played a central role in the "rescue" operation. According to the report, these British and US agents remained in the occupation state for the duration of the war, "providing intelligence and other logistical support" and "gathering and analyzing intelligence" in the service of freeing Israeli prisoners and locating Israeli leaders. Hamas. London and Washington, it seems, "have been able to provide intelligence from the air and cyberspace that Israel cannot gather on its own." Meanwhile, “the Pentagon and CIA provided intelligence gleaned from drone flights over Gaza, communications intercepts, and other sources.” Counter-terrorism operations That this report is a misleading cover should be obvious. If indeed British and US intelligence have been working from Tel Aviv since October 7 to track down Hamas leaders and release prisoners, their efforts have been as ineffective as the "rescue" operation itself. Leading sources acknowledge that Hamas remains largely unscathed, and IOF spokesmen say 120 prisoners remain in Gaza. This suggests a different motivation for the British covert presence in Israel. A UK Ministry of Defense communication dated 28 October 2023 instructed national news outlets not to mention that the elite Special Air Service (SAS) was "deployed to sensitive areas" of West Asia, conducting "rescue/evacuation operations of hostages". [The Ministry of Defense intends to prevent the inadvertent disclosure of classified information on Special Forces and other units engaged in security, intelligence and counter-terrorism operations [in Gaza], including their methods, techniques and activities. Western forces 'waiting' This censorship was likely prompted by British tabloids revealing that the SAS was "standing by" at bases in Cyprus "to rescue hostages held captive in Gaza". One SAS veteran described such an effort as almost inevitably suicidal: The situation in Gaza is unique in terms of trying to locate the hostages and find safe passage out. There's a lot of confusion about what's happening over there right now. Finding the right stronghold where the hostages are held will be difficult - then you will have to move safely to that location, find the hostages, and then leave. From a planning point of view, it will be an absolute nightmare. It could end in disaster. Despite the risks, the Israeli "rescue" operation went ahead, aiming to secure a propaganda victory for Tel Aviv and legitimize the involvement of British and US forces in Gaza. The New York Times investigation subtly hinted at a publicly expanded role for Britain and the United States in the assault on Gaza, while confirming their determination to support Israel's actions. In justifying Washington's involvement, the newspaper said that this support was provided "to a large extent... because American officials believe that the best way to persuade Israel to end the war is to recover the hostages and capture or kill key Hamas leaders." A Daily Telegraph editorial echoed this sentiment in an untitled editorial titled "We must support Israel's efforts to rescue the hostages," declaring that "the success of the rescue operation is a timely reminder of what Israel stands for fighting and the fundamental justice of its cause", while complaining that Tel Aviv's "military operations have been subjected to a level of scrutiny that is almost impossible to satisfy": Israel's stubborn commitment to rescuing the hostages and destroying Hamas stands in stark contrast to the West's weakness in supporting its efforts. It appears that, similar to how Western powers have systematically violated Russia's red lines, their direct participation in Gaza is set to be gradually normalized. In March, French threats to deploy troops to Odessa were rejected by Russian officials. Since then, a stream of public statements and media reports indicate that those soldiers will still arrive in the form of "advisers" and trainers. The strategic importance of Lebanon Israel's once-feared military giant has been consistently humiliated in direct clashes with the Palestinian resistance in Gaza and in exchanging heavy fire with the Lebanese resistance movement, Hezbollah. As reported by The Cradle, the occupation state is hiding heavy losses on every front it is engaged in. Despite this, Tel Aviv is openly preparing for an all-out war with Lebanon. The Cradle also revealed British efforts to gain unrestricted access to Lebanese territories – land, air and sea – for its soldiers, bypassing the need for "prior diplomatic authorization" for its "emergency missions". The deal between London and Beirut - abandoned after the proposal was leaked to Lebanese media - would have reportedly allowed British soldiers to travel in uniform with weapons visible anywhere in Lebanon, enjoying immunity from arrest or prosecution. accused of having committed any crime. It can be speculated that London anticipated the expansion of the Gaza conflict into a wider regional war and sought to consolidate its presence in the Levant in advance, potentially to secure this outcome. Israel's defeat by Hezbollah in 2006, coupled with its current military difficulties, underlines that Tel Aviv would not be able to defeat the Lebanese resistance without widespread foreign support. The strategic positioning of British and US forces lays bare their commitment to supporting Israel despite significant risks of political backlash and the potential for further regional destabilization. https://thecradle.co/.../media-hype-and-military-blunders...