Monday 14 October 2024

MANCHESTER 'BOMBING' - FREE SPEECH AT STAKE

The Trial of Richard D. Hall.


Photo: BBC



Richard D Hall - RICHPLANET.NET 
From:news@richplanet.net
To: TTV

Mon, 14 Oct at 14:49
Greetings,

Just to update you on the on-going situation with my recent trial at the
High Court in London.

I have obtained a full transcript of the trial which is available to read
or download from this link ...


My own cross examination starts at page 298 (of 454)

The witness statement I submitted to the trial can also be found here ...


I am interested to know from people who read the transcript any thoughts
they may have. Please send them to richard@richplanet.net.

I am expecting a judgment on the case on or around 24th October 2024. I
will let you know the outcome.

Thanks for your continued support and for the donations which have funded
my defence. Paul Oakley, my barrister did an excellent job. You can read
every word of what happened at the trial from the link above.

Further details can be found here ...


Further legal documents can be found here ...


My work on the Manchester Arena incident can be found here ...


Richard

[ NOTE : Please do not reply to this email. Use richard@richplanet.net ]


See how the BBC reports it

Conspiracist tells court 'no one 

injured' in arena attack


EXERPT

A self-described journalist who claims the Manchester Arena attack was faked has told the High Court he still maintains the bombing was staged.

Richard Hall is being sued in a civil trial by attack survivors Martin Hibbert and his daughter Eve, who were severely injured in the 2017 blast.

The former TV producer told the court he believed there "was no bomb", and "no one was genuinely injured in the attack" in which twenty-two people died.

The Hibberts have taken legal action against him for harassment and data protection.


PA MEDIA   Martin Hibbert and his daughter Eve have taken Mr Hall to court for harassment


Mr Hall, giving evidence on the third day of the trial, said he worked as a "fully independent investigative journalist" since 2015 after a career as an engineer and television producer.

He told the court: "There was no bomb in that room or genuinely injured people.

“The primary evidence shows there was no bomb in that room that exploded."

Mr Hall later said "millions of people have bought a lie" about the attack.



https://www.nelsonslaw.co.uk/judgement-conspiracy-theorist-claim/

Summary Judgement For Conspiracy Theorist Claim

Posted on August 9, 2024 at 11:51 am.
Written by Amrik Basra

Martin Hibbert and Eve Hibbert v Richard D Hall [2024] EWHC 1665 

Background

On 22 May 2017, Martin took his daughter, who at the time was 14, to the Ariana Grande concert in the Manchester Arena. As they left the concert, terrorist Salman Abedi detonated an explosive device killing and injuring many.

Martin was left paralysed from the waist down and Eve suffered a serious traumatic brain injury.

The Defendant in this case, Richard D Hall, publicly spoke and published works, including videos, articles, and a book alleging that the Manchester Bombing was a staged incident.

The Defendant made further claims that the Claimants did not attend the concert and their injuries were not a result of the terror attack. The Defendant also attended Eve’s home uninvited. After knocking on the door to no answer, the Defendant waited in his car to film Eve, her mother, and her carer without their consent.

As a result of the Defendant’s alleged actions, the Claimants issued a claim for harassment, misuse of private information, and breach of their data protection rights. The Claimants are seeking damages in addition to an injunction that would prevent the Defendant from being able to continue making claims in respect of the Manchester Bombing and the Claimants.

The Claimants applied for summary judgment in respect of specific issues concerning the case. The issues related to a number of statements made in the Claimant’s particulars of claim that were denied or not admitted by the Defendant. These were:

  1. On 22 May 2017, 22 people were murdered in a terror attack at the Manchester Arena;
  2. The Claimants were present at the time of the bombing;
  3. The Claimants were severely injured; and
  4. The cause of the injuries was the explosion of the bomb in the Manchester Arena on 22 May 2017.

It was for the Court to determine whether summary judgment could be ordered in respect of the issues and if so, come to a determination. The Court may grant summary judgment against a Defendant on a particular issue if the Defendant has no real prospect of defending the issue successfully and there is no compelling reason why the issue should be disposed of at trial.

When making this decision, the Court must not only consider the information available for the summary judgment application but also evidence reasonably expected to be available at trial.

Judgment

It was held that the Issues were not to be subject to debate at a future trial as the Defendant had no real prospect of succeeding on his claims regarding the Issues. Judge Davidson cited the mounds of evidence including witness statements, CCTV footage, and medical records all of which confirm that the Issues disputed by the Defendant were in fact true, further adding:

“Although his [the Defendant’s] beliefs may be genuinely held, his [the Defendant’s] theory that the Manchester bombing was an operation staged by government agencies in which no one was genuinely killed or injured is absurd and fantastical.”

The claim is now listed for a further directions hearing ahead of the final trial.


See also:

https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=MANCHESTER

https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=richard+d+hall

Friday 11 October 2024

 Thinking on two wheels




sdeopoStnr25,91eO2gb6562c7uh 010i22lm1g574amt 115roc0gtag746 



11.10.2024

Tim Veater shared a memory.

I am also a cyclist and a driver. I do about the same number of miles (only 1500) on each, the only difference being that the Government charges me four hundred pounds, plus most of the fuel cost, for the latter privilege. The roads have become modern jungle trail, where all the animals fight for access and supremacy. We all take the dry level surface for granted, though of course this is a wholly artificial state of affairs, resulting from human ingenuity and application.

How humans from previous centuries would have been amazed not only by the sophistication of the system of roads and motorways, but also at the number and speeds of the mechanical contraptions travelling over them, often in long, frustrating, time-wasting queues, with all their attendant noise and fumes, far removed from the more 'natural' ones of an horse-drawn era.

We have become accustomed to physical speed - every one seems to be in a hurry to get somewhere other than where they are. This is likely to have had a profound psychological effect on the human species, encouraging dissatisfaction and impatience. Irritability seems to be the underlying emotion of all drivers, everyone thinking they are 'primus inter pares', having right of way and god help those who frustrate it.

Cyclists it must be said, often find themselves at the receiving end of these frustrations, as unavoidably they take up space on the road and travel at a speed determined by legs rather than engine. Unlike the driver who expends almost no energy to go faster or slower, to change direction, to go up or down or even to remain upright and fixed to the road, the cyclist works hard to do all of these.

Despite the former ease, it is amazing how reluctant drivers can be to turn the steering wheel or apply the brakes, and when forced to do so, often resulting in loud objection from horn or voice box. There is in every motorist it seems, an angry devil only too willing and eager to get out.

The last hundred years has been the epoch of the motorised vehicle. It has shrunk distance, encouraged travel and thus altered almost every aspect of social interaction, paradoxically actually making it worse.

People in metal boxes at speed do not relate so intimately with either fellow travellers or with the environment through which they pass. It is an introverted and selfish experience, focused not on a journey but on the destination, missing all that comes between. In going further and faster, the here and now is jettisoned for the there and then, which takes just as long in coming, if it ever does.

Better to travel less far, preferably on two wheels, and see and breathe the moment.


Motor Vehicle Red Lights