Tuesday, 28 April 2026

 

A FEW MORE POEMS


Porthgwarra

by Tim Veater



Yesterday, I thought, “Tomorrow,

I'll do a trip, and venture to Porthgwarra.”

And so I did, and so I saw,

A newly appeared and terrifying thing:

In modern parlance, a 'Sink Hole'.

In fact a collapsed sea cave,

Unfenced and shear.

I stood entranced and petrified,

Requiring nerve to stand beside,

The unguarded edge and lear.


Where fathoms far below,

The rounded boulders,

Of an ocean floor appeared.

In dread imagination feared

It might collapse some more,

Even the very location where I stood.

Or what creatures plunged with it,

When all the ground had disappeared,

Or if by chance an unspecting walker,

Had slid into that ghastly abyss.


It was with some relief,

I walked away from it,

On narrow sandy path,

Past monoliths of granite,

Lichen-whiskered with salty time,

Topped by a cap of mustard yellow;

Buttoned on one side, white with Thrift,

The other, Bluebelled Oxford blue,

Led back to Porthgwarra Cove.

And there, next to the tumbling stream


Out to the limitless sea,

I sat and ate my quiche lorraine

And gazed in wonder

At the tireless, timeless waves.

Aware alone, I sat again,

After the many years had passed,

A vista dotted with yellow flags and gorse,

The spotted gold of lovers lost

And passions drained,

Into the blue and icy main.


The endangered Choughs,

Which protected, about here live,

In formal black, fly by aghast

And squawk their scornful laughter

At the curs-ed human far below,

Prayerfully partaking his repast,

Whilst rugged cliffs resist the ocean's roar,

Of Neptune's hammer blows.



The long love that in my thought doth harbour]


The long love that in my thought doth harbour 
And in mine heart doth keep his residence, 
Into my face presseth with bold pretence 
And therein campeth spreading his bannèr. 
She that me learns to love and suffèr 
And wills that my trust, and lust’s negligence 
Be reined by reason, shame, and reverence, 
With his hardiness takes displeasùre. 
Wherewithall unto the heart’s forest he fleèth, 
Leaving his enterprise with pain and cry, 
And there him hideth, and not appearèth. 
What may I do when my master fearèth? 
But in the field with him to live and die 
For good is the life, ending faithfully.


Thomas Wyatt, (1503 - 1542) a prolific poet, is accredited with introducing the fourteen line sonnet to England. The above is a take on Petrarch's (1304 - 1374) 'Amour che nel penser'.


WIKI:  "As the book fell open, Petrarch's eyes were immediately drawn to the following words from St Augustine's Confessions:

"And men go about to wonder at the heights of the mountains, and the mighty waves of the sea, and the wide sweep of rivers, and the circuit of the ocean, and the revolution of the stars, but themselves they consider not.[23]

"Petrarch's response was to turn from the outer world of nature to the inner world of "soul":

"I closed the book, angry with myself that I should still be admiring earthly things who might long ago have learned from even the pagan philosophers that nothing is wonderful but the soul, which, when great itself, finds nothing great outside itself. Then, in truth, I was satisfied that I had seen enough of the mountain; I turned my inward eye upon myself, and from that time not a syllable fell from my lips until we reached the bottom again. ... [W]e look about us for what is to be found only within. ... How many times, think you, did I turn back that day, to glance at the summit of the mountain which seemed scarcely a cubit high compared with the range of human contemplation[23]"

Lost Love by Tim Veater

Larger than life it got away,
Oh for the grace to let it go.
Where is the joy that went astray?
Gone on the howling gale that blows!
Familiar the face that looks my way.
Who would have guessed they knew me so?
Funny the funny games we play,
Making so sure that no one knows.

Bleached the colours. Faded the hues.
Where is the orchard that once we grew?
Gone in the chilling swirling river,
Blown by the wind, swept with a shiver -
Playing the part of the indifferent swinger -
Mountain peaks shrouded in icy-blue.


April 2026 by Tim Veater


So it is April yet again,

Yet again, yet again.

I like the sound of it,

Like a distant train,

Like a distant train,

Travelling the tracks,

Clicking the cracks,

Of an earthly time machine,

Thrusting its way, ever onward,

Into a tunnel of love,

Never to be seen again.


This little blue orb,

In its beautiful garb,

Is set like an opel in space

All blackness around

And ne're ever a sound

Until Artemis too,

Splashes down on its face

And the smell of the sea

And the sound of the waves

Salt splashing the ears

With an earthy refrain.


It's April again

Now freshened with rain

As the photons of light

Kiss the leaves,

For here it is yellow and green

And everyone's seen

What in April the sunlight can do,

To this small patch of garden I view.

Though none can explain

Whether particle or wave

Or absolutely nothing, tis true.


The light from a star

Falls right where we are

And somehow makes everything glow,

From the eye to the brain

I'll say it again

It's a mystery no one can know.

Exquisite, unique,

Of its beauty I speak

This April, this Spring,

Of it let us sing, 

Ere we drown in a blood-thirsty stew.


My gggGrandfather Thomas Veater's (1787 - 1857) mother was a Rose and he married a Parfitt

A lot of Gloucester 'Bishops' back along.

Robert Bishopp

Birth 1585 • Norwich, Norfolk, England

Death 1660 • Norwich, Norfolk England

at No comments:

Wednesday, 22 April 2026

Has Kier Starmer, 'Queered his Pitch'?

by Tim Veater




In one of his recent monologues, George Galloway identified three existential threats to Kier Starmer remaining much longer in post as Prime Minister.

One, the up-coming local elections in which Labour is expected to do disasterously, resulting in a revolt by MPs and a demand for his resignation.

Two, the appointment on his personal recommendation, of Peter Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States of America, despite his long and close association with the trafficker of under age girls, Jeffrey Epstein, even after he knew he had been convicted of related criminal charges.

Three, the up-coming trial of three young Ukrainian men, who set fire to two houses and a car, either owned by, or associated with, the Prime Minister. How they knew, and were able to identify those items, and why they would want to set fire to them despite the risks, is of course the burning question. (I hope you will excuse the pun but it is I think in better taste than Galloway constantly referring to "arsonists" and "arsonising"!) 

Starmer and the Labour Party gained a sweeping victory by default in the July 2024 General Election, because the nation was sick and tired of fourteen years of Conservative mismanagement. It was not because Labour had any clear prospectus or clearly stated priorities other than "clearing up the mess" left to them. This was not accidental but an intentional and successful manipulating electioneering strategy by Morgan McSweeney, who subsequently took responsibility (and 'the bullet') for the Mandelson farrago.

Starmer was elected his party's Leader and Prime Minister as 'Mr Truthful' and 'Mr Clean', having for many years been the Director of Public Prosecutions (2008 - 2013) before becoming an MP in 2015. He had obtained law degrees from Leeds and Oxford before becoming a Barrister and taking Silk in 2002 specialising, perhaps ironically, in International Humanitarian Law.

A whole series of events, including the three referred to above, have rather taken the shine off his public persona as a competent, ethical or even mildly inspirational political leader. In fact I believe history will regard him as one of the most forgettable.

Public attitude surveys indicate he is seen as stilted and unapproachable, and it is notable that his PR team has been working hard to correct this by multiple 'meet and greet' opportunities, particularly with children and animals, where he has obviously been groomed to be relaxed and smiling. Whether this ploy has been effective is doubtful.

Despite this, his public support figures are at historically low levels. You-Gov in March put him at 'Minus 49' and declining, not helped by the on-going Mandelson fiasco, in which it would appear everyone is to blame, apart from himself. No one believes he can cling on to the 'greasy pole' for much longer. 

As a prelude to today's (22.4.2026) Prime Minister's Questions he again drew attention to alleged attacks on jewish establishments and his government's commitment to opposing 'anti-semitism', whilst completely ignoring the appalling violence and injustice meted out to incarcerated innocent Palestinians. Torture and death in Israeli prisons has become a consistent and institutionally approved state of affairs, yet Starmer is blind to it. (See articles below)

He has notoriously defended and excused blatant Israeli war crimes including starvation, with the legal fig leaf of 'right to self defence', whilst for the last two and a half years, he has headed up a government actively supportive of Israeli genocide, whilst criminalising, arresting and prosecuting English men and women who have the audacity and courage to protest against it.

It is symptomatic of his biased and blinkered 'moral outrage', evident yet again in the Mandelson case, which was directed against every one and every thing, except his own opinion; his own judgment. Particularly surprising in a man who spent decades as a prominent Barrister and Chief Prosecutor for England and who has made much of his own professional integrity.

There is a touch of the Dickens' character Uriah Heap about him, particularly as he fawned over Donald Trump, rushing to pick up his dropped papers and making a 'present' of the King's invitation. (Was it done on purpose by that meglomaniac? I have often wondered.) Little good it did him as he resisted Trump's demands to join the attacks on Iran, perhaps his first principled move.

What we have witnessed in Parliament and more generally, is not integrity, but legal sophistry and chicanery: ignoring the spirit of an agreement by finding the let-out clause in the small print. Blaming everyone else for the policy he agressively promoted. ("Fucking get it done" were the actual words emanating from Number Ten Downing Street to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office!) Yet now he insists if only he had known the full facts, he would have not appointed Peter Mandelson to the post of American Ambassador. 

In less than two years he has managed to blame and sack (or 'resigned') at least eight important officials in either party, government or civil service. Sue Gray, Chief of Staff; Matthew Doyle, Head of Communications; Stephanie Driver, Hear of Communications; James Lyons, Head of Communications; Angela Rayner, Deputy Prime Minister; Morgan MacSweeney, Chief of Staff; Chris Wormald, Cabinet Secretary; and Sir Olly Robbins, Permanent Under-Secretary. 



He even claims to 'take responsibility' for a bad decision, whilst transparently not doing so. Has there ever been a better example of political humbug? He is the platoon leader who blows the whistle but remains in the trench.

It is clear Starmer is 'on the ropes', but hopes by 'ducking and diving' he can survive the sustained ferocious verbal attack. Maybe he has been partly successful? Today in Parliament he claimed the issue of his involvement in the Mandelson debacle, "had been put to bed". Some might consider this an unfortunate Freudian slip. With three Ukrainian 'Escorts' and 'Models' coming to trial, the expression may yet prove prophetic.

The Prime Minister has made much of the concept of 'due process and that it was followed, yet somehow the critical security failure finding was not conveyed to him. He sought to shift the focus from an extraordinary failure of decision-making, to an "extraordinary failur of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office". Acolytes were dispatched to newsrooms to repeat the exact same adjective in an obviously coordinated effort to shift the blame.

Despite the failure, vetting was said to have been passed and the appointment was made despite it. In fact the appointment was announced as Olly Robbins revealed, before even the vetting had taken place! This it was claimed was standard practice for 'political appointments', as in the Mandelson case. 

All of this is utilized by Starmer to deny accountability. It is all the smallprint in the contract - the let-out clauses, whilst deflecting the obvious. But Starmer did not need a professional vetting process to inform and persuade him Mandelson was unsuited for the American post: the reasons were already in the public domain - let alone in the private political one.

Mandelson had been sacked from office twice before. He had a dubious sexual history that may make him subject to blackmail. He had long been recognised as 'master of the black arts'. 

He had had a long-standing intimate relationship with a notorious sex addict and trafficker even after he had been convicted of such and had passed government confidential financial information to him. 

In addition his personal and business links with Chinese and Russian interests, particulary the Russian alleged criminal oligarch Oleg Deripaska, were enough to raise serious questions in any fair-minded person, let alone a well-informed Prime Minister, with direct access to all the Secret Services. 

All or any of this should have debarred him. Starmer, Englands Chief Criminal Prosecutor knew it; as a fellow Labour politician he knew it; as Prime Minister he must have known it; yet now incredibly he claims ignorance as the excuse for appointing him. The real question that Dianne Abbott posed is, "Why if he wasn't informed of the results of the vetting process, didn't he ask?"

An even more important question perhaps is, despite what everyone knew in and out of government of Mandelson's unsuitability for the post of Ambassador, why was Starmer and the Cabinet Office so determined to appoint him? What positive features outweighed all the negatives? 

Was it indeed that his reputation as "Prince of Darkness" and the skills he possessed would work well in an administration headed by Trump?  That there would in fact be a meeting of minds and outlook? 

And can we forget that both Trump and Mandelson shared a common friend - and no doubt a great deal of inside information on - a man called Epstein and the intimate life of all of them? By general agreement, Epstein was an asset, if not an agent, of the Israeli regime. There is similar concurrence regarding Netanyahu's influence over Trump. 

Starmer, grounded in his jewish roots, has made clear his support of Israel, despite overwhelming evidence of war crimes and heinous humanitarian infringements. It has been said that the secret services of America, Israel and Britain, behind the scenes, act as one. In the murky business of the appointment of Mandelson, the least referred to element of the puzzle, might in fact, be the most important.

Meanwhile .... Britain STILL supplying military equipment to Israel despite its use to target and kill civilians en masse!


Belgian authorities have blocked a shipment of military components originating in the United Kingdom and destined for Israel, intervening at Liège Airport in what officials say was an enforcement of existing arms transfer rules.

The shipment, which arrived at the airport on March, 24, was stopped before it could continue on to Israel. Belgian officials acted after concerns were raised about whether the transfer complied with regional export and transit regulations governing military equipment. Reporting on the incident indicates the cargo included components tied to military aircraft systems, prompting closer inspection by authorities 

The shipment allegedly included components associated with fire control systems and military aircraft, including parts linked to F-35 fighter jet systems and manufactured by Moog, a US-based defense contractor with production facilities in the United Kingdom. Those components fall under controlled categories such as ML5 (targeting and fire control systems) and ML10 (aircraft and related equipment) in the U.K.’s Strategic Export Control Lists.


So far, so good?

This year marks Moog’s 75th anniversary, reflecting decades of resilience and ingenuity.

Founded in 1951 by Bill Moog with a bold vision to empower people and solve tough problems through trust and innovation, our company grew from a small airplane hangar in East Aurora into a global leader in aerospace, defense, industrial automation, and medical technology. Through change and challenge, Moog has remained committed to innovation and culture. Today, we continue to shape the way our world moves while building a sustainable business for generations to come.

France
1 Chemin de Laporte
31300 Toulouse, France

Ireland
Ridgewell House, Hollywood, Ballyboughal
County Dublin, Ireland A41 YV66



 


Luton, UK
Lobby
Unit C Airport Executive Park
President Way
Luton, LU2 9NY

Shipping
Unit C Airport Exectutive Park
receiving on the side
President Way
Luton, LU2 9NY

 Tewkesbury, UK

Ashchurch Tewkesbury
Gloucestershire, GL20 8NA

Wolverhampton, UK
Valiant Way
Wolverhampton, WV9 5GB

Space and Defense



England
30 Suttons Business Park
Reading Berkshire, RG6 1AW
Tel: +44 (0) 118 966 6044


Germany
Moog GmbH
Hanns-Klemm-Str. 28
71034 Böblingen
Tel: +49 7031 622 0

Moog Cotsworks
Am Alten Schlachthof 4
36037 Fulda
Tel: +49 (0) 661 9786 9200

Ireland
Ringaskiddy County Cork
Tel: +353 21 451 9000



Israeli Prison Torture: 'WELCOME TO HELL'

https://www.btselem.org/publications/202408_welcome_to_hell





From:  




















Kristyan Benedict - Amnesty International UK

 
From:supporters@email.amnestyuk.org.uk

Dear Tim,  

Following the joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran which began on 28 February, hostilities have extended across borders - resulting in widespread civilian casualties, the largescale destruction of civilian infrastructure, mass displacement and serious disruptions to essential services. 

This crisis has precipitated a grave and escalating human rights and humanitarian crisis. 

We are continuing to press the UK government to do everything possible to protect civilians and strictly adhere to international law. We have also pressed for a commitment to an investigation of violations and potential war crimes by all parties to the conflicts. We want the government to do all in its power to prevent further military escalation and crimes under international law. 

Sadly, our government is failing to meet this challenge when it comes to Israel and the US. In particular, they haven’t:  

  • Refused the provision of UK airbases and airspace in support of military operations that may contribute to violations of international human rights law and humanitarian law. 
  • Stopped arms transfers where there is a substantial risk that the weapons could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international human rights or humanitarian law.  
Regarding Israel specifically, the UK government has still not unequivocally opposed – in words and more importantly, actions - Israel’s horrific invasion of Lebanon and its plans to set up a civilian-free buffer zone in parts of southern Lebanon.  
 
The UK should work with and encourage the Lebanese authorities to investigate and prosecute these crimes. We want our government to defend and uphold human rights and rebuild the power of international law, uphold international justice, and ensure accountability. 
 
We will update you further on our work, as we continue to pressure the UK government to respect international law, call out violations by its partners and leverage all available diplomatic tools to ensure all parties abide by their obligations to protect civilians. 




Torture in Israeli prisons is institutionalised and normalised: Albanese:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEnhk2OHBO8
at No comments: