tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post4162485195426811392..comments2023-09-20T07:12:07.398-07:00Comments on Veater Ecosan: "The World About Us": Veaterecosanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-50052656736753961302016-03-17T18:08:22.579-07:002016-03-17T18:08:22.579-07:00The Macur Review is an independent review, chaired...The Macur Review is an independent review, chaired by Lady Justice Macur, DBE. It's a review of Sir Ronald Waterhouse’s inquiry into the abuse of children in care in the former Gwynedd and Clwyd council areas of North Wales between 1974 and 1996.<br />The Macur Review was set up by the government to:<br /><br />review the scope of the Waterhouse Inquiry, which published its report Lost in Care in February 2000<br />determine whether any specific allegations of child abuse falling within the inquiry’s terms of reference were not investigated<br />make recommendations to the Secretary of State for Justice and the Secretary of State for Wales, It is totally independent from the government. See: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/macur-review/about<br />An inquiry that found "no evidence" of historical abuse by establishment figures in former north Wales children's homes has been backed by a review.<br />Lady Justice Macur published her two-year review into the 2000 Waterhouse inquiry on Thursday.<br />She said there was "no reason" to undermine its findings.<br />Welsh Secretary Stephen Crabb said the government welcomed the findings but the abuse "must never be forgotten".<br />Sir Ronald Waterhouse's inquiry looked into historical child abuse in care in the former Gwynedd and Clwyd council areas between between 1974 and 1996.<br />It found there had been "appalling mistreatment" of children over 20 years but nothing pointed to abuse by prominent public figures. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-35827193<br />THIS OF COURSE COMES AS A GREAT RELIEF AS WELL AS SURPRISE!Veaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-1788365961992989202016-03-10T06:55:08.135-08:002016-03-10T06:55:08.135-08:00THE HUNDRED YEAR RULE! https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...THE HUNDRED YEAR RULE! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Machon <br /><br />"Annie Machon (born 1968) is a former MI5 intelligence officer who left the Service at the same time as David Shayler, her partner at the time, to help him blow the whistle about alleged criminality within the intelligence agencies. By doing this, they had to give up their careers, go on the run across Europe (August 1997), live in hiding for a year, and then spend the next two years in exile in Paris. They, and many of their friends, family, supporters and journalists, claim to have been intimidated, and some of them were arrested and put on trial. A death threat was announced against her on a Middle Eastern radio station."<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUb7RKMu8zY<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRXWmk49vU<br />Veaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-21698843556969749582016-03-09T03:18:07.182-08:002016-03-09T03:18:07.182-08:00Exaro report on the BBC 'Smith Review' her...Exaro report on the BBC 'Smith Review' here: http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5785/smith-review-finds-72-bbc-linked-victims-of-sir-jimmy-savile?utm_source=newsletter-news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter-09-03-2016Veaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-55494228810222454072016-03-08T14:09:48.901-08:002016-03-08T14:09:48.901-08:00In response to this video https://www.youtube.com/...In response to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krEfFI4N1Ms I made this observation:<br /><br />"These films are inherently unreliable if not intentionally misdirecting. As usual focus on everything OTHER than the difficult questions. They concentrate on the very understandable and moving emotional consequences for the next of kin. Post Paris, it cannot escape notice that despite the distance in time there are strange similarities. Notice the wording: Major says "What happened cannot be understood". Those were the words used by Bush and others about planes flying into the twin towers. In both cases we now know in fact it could be understood, but the explanation could not be revealed. Indeed in an unprecedented move all the documents relating to the case were by the order of Lord Cullen made secret for a century! Why? The reasons given are unconvincing. It replicates what happened in the not unrelated Holly Grieg case. There are many dubious issues that are glossed over - the fact that he set off much earlier than stated yet missed the assembly, his technical ability to cut telephone wires, the ability to carry so much ammunition into the school, a Smith and Wesson, a convenient letter to the Queen just before, the fact that he had TWO head wounds(!) - but so many accurate shots in so short a time including head shots, both technically and psychologically points to a trained killer. Hamilton might have had many defects, but those were not some of them. The unrevealed hinterland of high-level political and other contact around the topic of pornography and child abuse creates question that were never even addressed by Cullen and all emphasis was placed on perhaps largely irrelevant gun control that would not have been possible without the incident. How often have we seen these recurring in other incidents around the world? The question never posed in MSM (what a surprise) is did Hamilton in fact shoot himself, was it him that shot the children, was he in fact a 'patsy' that had to be eliminated in a military style operation with a two fold objective of removing a risk and achieving policy objectives that would otherwise be impossible?"Veaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-1562639921036960842016-03-08T07:04:13.391-08:002016-03-08T07:04:13.391-08:00Sandra Uttley's Dunblane interview continues h...Sandra Uttley's Dunblane interview continues here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pa3_6fpbxY&ebc=ANyPxKrxazGh045oUcK6YQeTZ5CcAJr2PT6_zXFsP-TfNLZGDaSM0wXuoo56G80fzey0g4mlEXRL2tRlr_3nIhJQv6CgcDS1dQVeaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-57900969235952608012016-03-08T05:52:40.524-08:002016-03-08T05:52:40.524-08:00Note parallels with other mass shootings, world-wi...Note parallels with other mass shootings, world-wide. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m7hBpGpNCQ Published on 2 Sep 2014<br />Sandra Uttley discusses what she knows about the Dunblane murders. There was a coverup to the highest degree, from the police, and Freemasons, to Government officials. Thomas Hamilton looks like he was supplying and grooming children for his rich elite controllers. We need an open inquiry into this.Veaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-18772773334589771522016-03-08T05:35:02.857-08:002016-03-08T05:35:02.857-08:00David Ike's take on Dunblane here: https://www...David Ike's take on Dunblane here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JuGUHdJuqQ. March 5th, 2016 at 3:23 pm<br />These incidents are as intriguing as they are are tragic and even with the passage of time, remain so. It is hard to come up with a psychological explanation equal to the circumstances. Why would a man wish to inflict such carnage on innocent children? Was it to fulfill some demented fantasy, or to satisfy some vindictive grudge, or according to instructions received, or even not carried out by him but blamed on him by person or persons unknown? All of these are not beyond the realms of possibility. If as seems to be the case, Hamilton was shot TWICE in the head, it certainly raises a serious question as to how he died and by whom. And if there is a question about that, there is a question about everything. I know little or nothing about the case but know enough about others, never to necessarily take the official description or explanation at face. How and why, I ask myself, was Hamilton carrying two different weapons – a Browning pistol, plus 25 extended box type magazines, each containing 20 bullets? Was the .357 Smith and Wesson revolver in a holster that would enable him to handle the Browning revolver including changing the magazines? Is a possibility that someone else did the shooting to be blamed on Hamilton who had to be ‘neutralised’ as part of the plan, so out of the question. Knowing of the wider highly inflammatory activities of a wider network of high-profile figures that Hamilton was probably wise to, his danger and the need to get rid of him, is not hard to visualise. The subsequent treatment of the case and the unprecedented secrecy that surrounded it, tend to support such a possibility. Only a thorough and careful analysis of the facts enables certain hypotheses to be at least ruled out, one of which appears to be that Hamilton killed himself.Veaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-38494550986914187052016-03-07T04:25:37.871-08:002016-03-07T04:25:37.871-08:00Never let leave of a healthy scepticism - from wha...Never let leave of a healthy scepticism - from whatever quarter is, I think, a useful motto! "Fides tamen quin"? Regards, Tim. Veaterecosanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641952897751927118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-16020109263196831952016-03-06T17:07:18.442-08:002016-03-06T17:07:18.442-08:00p.s. Still can't square the Gordon Bowden stan...p.s. Still can't square the Gordon Bowden stance on Andrea Davison tho.....he is so thorough.....confusingAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02735902380273768194noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-863336524369281662.post-91049472864779752402016-03-06T17:06:18.817-08:002016-03-06T17:06:18.817-08:00Devastating...we cannot rest until we fully, irrev...Devastating...we cannot rest until we fully, irrevocably expose this, prosecute the abusers and help the children even adult children heal....thanks for all you doAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02735902380273768194noreply@blogger.com